Gun control advocates would like second amendment ignored or deleted or misintetrpreted. Do you understand those voters?
Who has proposed deleting or ignoring it? (BTW ignoring it is not changing it.)
Gun control advocates would like second amendment ignored or deleted or misintetrpreted. Do you understand those voters?
Who has proposed deleting or ignoring it? (BTW ignoring it is not changing it.)
There is something wrong with an AMERICAN voter not understanding the basic concept of FREEDOM and the situation with the Religous WHACKOS that forced the Pilgrams to the Americas in the first place.
Are you aware of gun control advocates or the whole issue of the second amendment, and the the two opinions on it? Stop being a fucking retarded asshole.
Having a different opinion of an amendments meaning than you does not mean they are proposing ignoring or deleating it. You are being disengenous. I provided a quote where Huckleberry proposed changing the Constitution to bring it in line with religous docterine.
The Pilgrims were religious whackos. I am fine with them being so long as they keep it to themselves. Huckabee talks about going beyond that, but what have his actions been? Pretty mild from what I find.
http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/analysis.aspx?id=19615
Meanwhile, McCain has consistently supported aggressive use of the military. Hillary is not a whole lot better. In my book, the south has chosen much better than other states. I don't see how anyone can make irrational hatred of religion their primary focus with what our nation now faces.
I am talking about the words Huckleberry is using to get elected. I am not disagreeing with you about McCain, he is terrable. I voted for Obama. I am not making religion the primary focus of what our nation now faces, I am making it the focus of this thread. And it has nuthing to do with hatrid of religion, it has to do with a hartid of using religion to limit freedom.
But if you're opinion is that is does not actually apply to people, then you are ignoring it, when your spirit of interpretation is so fraudulent.
How about using environmentalism, or social justice to limit freedom? Are those valid reasons?
"A well regulated militia being necessary for the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed."
Do you see WELL REGULATED MILITIA. Its open to interpertation. I know of noone proposing delieting it or ignoring it. Let me ask you a question, should the general public be allowed a Howitzer in the back yard?
You've made like 25 posts saying you are afraid Hucklebee will be the candidate. Ok, we get it.
Hucklebee will not be the candidate because if he was McCain would lose in a tremendous landslide.
So just relax.
And there is nothing wrong with the South except for its blind obsession to SEC football and disrespecting of the Pac 10.
I dont like those, however I dont find it anywhere as offensive as using something as sacred as religen.
Should every man be allowed a handgun?
Militias are voluntary populist ragtag teams. They are not state entities.
The point is you twist your interpretations to fit what you THINK is right anyway. Do you understand yourself?
That is different from ignoring the amendment or proposing it be deleted.
so your problem with theocracy is that it's a insult to religion and you don't really have an objection to totalitarianism in general, or totalitrianism based on other ideological foundations?
I am talking about the words Huckleberry is using to get elected. I am not disagreeing with you about McCain, he is terrable. I voted for Obama. I am not making religion the primary focus of what our nation now faces, I am making it the focus of this thread. And it has nuthing to do with hatrid of religion, it has to do with a hartid of using religion to limit freedom.
Not in reality. Only in your fake little world where you're actually smart.
In all fairness, the Pac 10 does indeed suck ass.
I have a problem with it, I am just not AS offended by it when its religen is not the scape goat. I belive religen is more sacred than enviromentalism for example.