Preppers and Nutters, the party is over.

The libtards can kvetch all they want. They are not going to ban guns. Even Obuttface is skeered of it. Look how lightly he is treading.

BTW, I think the libtardiots here forget that for two years the demalquedacrats had the House and a filibuster proof Senate. Where was the gun control then. In fact the libtards said that everyone was a consipracy nut when it was hinted that Ofuckheadbama wanted to come after our guns. Now, the first chance they get they are coming for them.

So the blood of these children are on the hands of demalquedacrats who had a chance and didn't take it.
 
Thing1 said:
Contraception isn't really that cheap for someone w/ a low income. And who cares - if the bottom line is that taxpayers will ultimately save money, which they will, isn't that the point?
Click to expand...

I agree, I was just pointing out that it was not a situation that should have been mandated. Mandate it for Medicaid for the poor and be done. Then let plans include it or not. I would think most would given it is relatively cheap especially compared to the alternative pregnancy. But I don't think that should be something mandated.
 
apple0154 said:
The only way they could acquire access to a car would be by getting the keys. If you have small children at home do you leave your car keys lying around?
Click to expand...

But we're not talking about small children; no matter how much your face hurts from being bitch slapped, with your own logic and failure to answer the question.
 
apple0154 said:
What type of "something" could prevent a 20 year old from getting access to the guns? Do you think she had a safe at home? A locked wooden cabinet may prevent a toddler from getting access to guns but it wouldn't stop a 20 year old.

As I said before, "Think, man. Think!"
Click to expand...

You should try that "thinking" thing yourself, before posting.
With no information to back your ASSumptions, you are trying to make it appear that you have knowledge of what occured and how.

But you go ahead and keep preaching from your soapbox; even though the one you're on, was built by the bodies of 20 dead children.
 
apple0154 said:
When a crime is committed and someone tries to think of ways to prevent such a crime from happening in the future they're using the victims to promote an agenda? You're a nutter, USF, and your posts continue to verify that.
Click to expand...

As long as you're happy; dragging the bodies of 20 dead children through the streets, to promote your agenda.
 
Thing1 said:
That's typical pennywise, pound-foolish thinking.

Unwanted pregnancies cost the taxpayers MUCH more in the long run. Preventing them is a good priority to have when it comes to coverage.
Click to expand...

That's why women should be required to carry abortion liability insurance.
 
Thing1 said:
It's a real stretch to say that if automatic/assault-type weapons aren't available, they'll just make bombs.

You're just pulling that out of the air. There is no reasonable backup for it.
Click to expand...

Tell that to the 168 people who died in Oklahoma on April 19, 1995.
 
bravo said:
You agenda is gun control....and you're using the 20 dead children and the emotion it creates to advance that agenda....why even deny it ?
Like our liberals admit, don't let a good crisis go by when you can exploit it to your political advantage....
Click to expand...

Both sides are using the tragedy, Grumpa Cracker, NRA is raking in the dough, so go back to your usual racist,sexists screed!

You faux outrage doesn't fly here.
 
Rana said:
Both sides are using the tragedy, Grumpa Cracker, NRA is raking in the dough, so go back to your usual racist,sexists screed!

You faux outrage doesn't fly here.
Click to expand...


The NRA is raking in the dough ?.....Prove that....

No outrage from me.....you pinheads are harping about gun control all because of this mental case in CT.....
using the dead children and the high emotions for political gain.....you're pathetic.

What possible gain could the right get form this tragic affair ?
 
bravo said:
The NRA is raking in the dough ?.....Prove that....

No outrage from me.....you pinheads are harping about gun control all because of this mental case in CT.....
using the dead children and the high emotions for political gain.....you're pathetic.

What possible gain could the right get form this tragic affair ?
Click to expand...

It isn't what they gain, it is what they lose.

It has been reported in another thread, the NRA memberships have increased since Sandy Hook.

I have advocated for a ban on certain weapons and ammunition since well before Sandy Hook, as well as other restrictions, like Internet sales, and will continue to do so.
 
Thing1 said:
It's a real stretch to say that if automatic/assault-type weapons aren't available, they'll just make bombs.

You're just pulling that out of the air. There is no reasonable backup for it.
Click to expand...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Norway_attacks

From Oslo, Norway... one of the most gun-free areas of the planet:

The 2011 Norway attacks were two sequential lone wolf terrorist attacks against the government, the civilian population and a Workers' Youth League (AUF)-run summer camp in Norway on 22 July 2011, claiming a total of 77 lives.
The first was a car bomb explosion in Oslo within Regjeringskvartalet, the executive government quarter of Norway, at 15:25:22 (CEST).[1] The bomb was made from a mixture of fertiliser and fuel oil[11][12] and placed in the back of a car.[13] The car was placed in front of the office of Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg and other government buildings.[14] The explosion killed eight people and injured at least 209 people, twelve of them seriously.[8][9][10]
The second attack occurred less than two hours later at a summer camp on the island of Utøya in Tyrifjorden, Buskerud. The camp was organized by the AUF, the youth division of the ruling Norwegian Labour Party (AP). A gunman dressed in a homemade police uniform and showing false identification[15][16] gained access to the island and subsequently opened fire at the participants, killing 69 of them,[5][6] and injuring at least 110, 55 of them seriously;[9][10] the 69th victim died in a hospital two days after the massacre.[7] Among the dead were personal friends of Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg and the stepbrother of Norway's crown princess Mette-Marit.[17]
It was the deadliest attack in Norway since World War II,[18][19] and a survey found that on average, 1 in 4 Norwegians knew "someone affected by the attacks".[20] The European Union, NATO and several countries around the world expressed their support for Norway and condemned the attacks. On 13 August 2012 Norway's prime minister received the Gjørv Report which concluded that Norway's police could have prevented the bombing of central Oslo, caught mass killer Anders Behring Breivik faster at Utøya and that more security and emergency measures to prevent further attacks and "mitigate adverse effects" should have been implemented on 22 July.[21]
The Norwegian Police arrested Anders Behring Breivik, a then 32-year-old Norwegian right-wing extremist,[22] on Utøya island[23] and charged him with both attacks.[24] The trial against him took place between 16 April and 22 June 2012 in Oslo District Court, and as at all his remand hearings[2][3] Breivik admitted to having carried out the actions he was accused of, but denied criminal guilt and claimed the defence of necessity (jus necessitatis).[25] On 24 August 2012 Breivik was convicted as charged and sentenced to 21 years of preventive detention in prison, which at the end can be repeatedly extended for 5 years as long as he is considered a threat to society.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top