President Trump has brought in Tulsi Gabbard for debate preparation against Kamala Harris

Lionfish said:
If there is one question I want to hear Trump ask Heels UP Harris, it is "When did you know Brandon was unfit for running for a second term?"

Other than that Trump should stick to inflation, pending wars, and the ongoing border crisis.
Click to expand...
He should also thank her for accepting his policy positions on jobs and the economy like eliminating taxes on tips. Maybe he could say, "It's nice to see you like my policies so much you want to do them too..."
 
Lionfish said:
If there is one question I want to hear Trump ask Heels UP Harris, it is "When did you know Brandon was unfit for running for a second term?"

Other than that Trump should stick to inflation, pending wars, and the ongoing border crisis.
Click to expand...

But you know he won't. He'll go completely off the rails, and ignore policy in favor of mindless personal attacks and lies.

It's what he does. What a leader.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
He should also thank her for accepting his policy positions on jobs and the economy like eliminating taxes on tips. Maybe he could say, "It's nice to see you like my policies so much you want to do them too..."
Click to expand...
You do know that Harris nor Trump came up with the idea, been around for decades, and there is a reason it hasn’t been enacted, neither candidate will bring it to fruition
 
archives said:
You do know that Harris nor Trump came up with the idea, been around for decades, and there is a reason it hasn’t been enacted, neither candidate will bring it to fruition
Click to expand...
This election season, Trump pitched it as a campaign talking point. Harris has since picked it up and is now saying the same thing. Your appeal to history fallacy is, as with all fallacies, irrelevant.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
This election season, Trump pitched it as a campaign talking point. Harris has since picked it up and is now saying the same thing. Your appeal to history fallacy is, as with all fallacies, irrelevant.
Click to expand...

Sometimes, good ideas are just that. I'd hate a candidate to reject a good idea just because the "other side" came up w/ it. Too many of them do that.

It would hardly lead one to any kind of conclusion that Trump is better on the economy. We know he isn't. He was an abysmal economic President.
 
BartenderElite said:
Sometimes, good ideas are just that. I'd hate a candidate to reject a good idea just because the "other side" came up w/ it. Too many of them do that.

It would hardly lead one to any kind of conclusion that Trump is better on the economy. We know he isn't. He was an abysmal economic President.
Click to expand...
Doesn't change what I said earlier.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top