There are a lot of laws not in the Constitution
Refugee status requested
- Thread starter countryboy
- Start date
countryboy
Verified User
Lol, I know. And many of them are unconstitutional.
RB 60
Get Off My Lawn
Absolutely. One cannot be in a militia without being armed.
That said, my statement was to counter his "militia" argument when it comes.
Do not let the fact that the term "illegal immigrants" does not appear in the document lead you to believe that the U.S. Constitution's rights and freedoms do not apply to them.
Often described as a "living document," the Constitution has repeatedly been interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court, federal appeals courts and Congress in order to address the ever-changing needs and demands of the people. While many argue that "We the People of the United States," refers only to legal citizens, the Supreme Court has consistently disagreed.
https://www.thoughtco.com/do-illegal-immigrants-have-constitutional-rights-3321849
countryboy
Verified User
It's only described as a "living document" by leftist usurpers. Try reading the writings of the founding fathers, that shows their intent. Look, its fine if you want to have open borders, just don't pretend it's constitutional. Be honest.
That was not the discussion, you incorrectly stated that illegal aliens have no rights and that is incorrect, whether you agree with it or not, illegal aliens have rights.
Русский агент
Путин - мl
Floriduhfan is confusing interpretative rulings with the Constitution itself, it seems.
countryboy
Verified User
No i didn't, I said they have no constitutional rights. But I should have more accurately stated, they have no constitutional protections. All human beings have human rights, by virtue of them being, well, human. Lol.
Русский агент
Путин - мl
She's a well-known liar. No surprise that she misrepresented what you said.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
that's what he said.....
Why do liberals pretend they know anything about the Constitution. The ONLY rights illegals or foreign nationals have on American soil is DUE PROCESS. They do not have Constitutional Rights like ordinary American citizens.
You leftist dimwits need to extract your heads from your a-holes.
DUH! Good lord; you give new meaning to the term moron. Again, this isn't about aLOT of laws dimwitted wonder child, it is about the moronic leftist CLAIM that ILLEGALS have Constitutional Rights.
Yeah, they do, moron.
Русский агент
Путин - мl
Like Puerto Rico sent Americans to Vietnam to contribute to emergencies in the USA?
Loser.
Not today. You original intent morons love that original intent until you don't. Isn't that convenient?
Like Puerto Rico sent Americans to Vietnam to contribute to emergencies in the USA?
Loser.
lol
“Is Vietnam "in America"?
Was the Vietnam war an "emergency in America"?"
Still a couple of the top stupid fuck questions in forum history. Thanks!
Русский агент
Путин - мl
Why did you say that Puerto Rico sent "Americans" to "Vietnam" when you were asked what Puerto Rico sent to "contribute to an emergency in the USA"?
I'll understand if you can't explain.
Loser.
Why did you say that Puerto Rico sent "Americans" to "Vietnam" when you were asked what Puerto Rico sent to "contribute to an emergency in the USA"?
I'll understand if you can't explain.
Loser.
Quiz.
Q. "Where is Vietnam?"
GBA: "In America?"
Priceless!
Русский агент
Путин - мl
That's not what was said, and I can prove it, DEMOCRAT.
Why did you say that Puerto Rico sent "Americans" to "Vietnam" when you were asked what Puerto Rico sent to "contribute to an emergency in the USA"?
I'll understand if you still can't explain.
Loser.
That's not what was said, and I can prove it, DEMOCRAT.
Why did you say that Puerto Rico sent "Americans" to "Vietnam" when you were asked what Puerto Rico sent to "contribute to an emergency in the USA"?
I'll understand if you still can't explain.
Loser.
Dance to my tune, Mosquito! Dance!