Retired (Republican) Justice Stevens argues for repeal of Second Amendment

Leonthecat said:
The second will never likely be repealed , but it is ripe for reinterpretation.
The current interpretation isn't all that old.
Click to expand...

It just got reinterpreted in Heller. There is nothing a reinterpretation would do that cannot be currently done.
 
Nomad said:
The demise of the 2nd Amendment is coming.

It's only a matter of time.

Nothing you can do about it.

Tick.

Tock.

Tick.

Tock.
Click to expand...

When you post this stuff I get this picture of you jumping up and down in glee, while clapping your hands.

elf-excitement-will-ferrell.gif


Then I realize how you're going to look when you don't get what you want, like a child pouting on Christmas day.

tumblr_o02vmb1Aex1rc7zl1o3_400.gif


:evilnod:
 
IQ of 64 said:
Fuck the police. They are nothing but racist bullies with guns.
Click to expand...

One can only hope that you find yourself on a street corner getting beaten by some street thugs and the cops are across the street watching and laughing.

IQ of 64 said:
The entire Law Enforcement establishment needs to be revamped as well. They need to get rid of all the racism and racist and start fresh.
Click to expand...

Liberals need a brain enema.
 
Leonthecat said:
The second will never likely be repealed , but it is ripe for reinterpretation.
The current interpretation isn't all that old.
Click to expand...

And while it's being looked at, maybe they relook at other parts also; like who can vote, what makes someone a citizen, freedom of speech, and the separation of Church and State.

Sounds like a good idea. :good4u:
 
I agree. Repeal and replace with some carefully drafted and specific language the limits magazines, ensures our cops and military have better arms than the criminals,
requires training and prohibits ownership by mental defectives. All should be registered, all parts should be traceable. Each gun should be prefired and the FEDERAL government
have its rifling thumbprint. Owners should be strictly liable for harm, including harm by private hypothecation and some later felony. Tons of things need to be done
and they should all be spelled out. The stupid militia language removed, the regulation specifically enumerated. The not infringed removed.

I 10 munutes I could save a million lives and hunters could still kill bambi. This country is filled overflowing with paranoid morons.
 
TTQ64 said:
Fuck the police. They are nothing but racist bullies with guns.

The entire Law Enforcement establishment needs to be revamped as well. They need to get rid of all the racism and racist and start fresh.
Click to expand...

I won't disagree, but do you think that the government will change any of that once we the people are disarmed?
 
TTQ64 said:
Fuck the police. They are nothing but racist bullies with guns.

The entire Law Enforcement establishment needs to be revamped as well. They need to get rid of all the racism and racist and start fresh.
Click to expand...

Start with yourself - now go cry harder, bitch. :D
 
Leonthecat said:
"Serious" modifies the noun "take" in that last sentence, so the word would take the adverbial form "seriously".
I thought you were supposed to be smart?
Oh well
Click to expand...
grammar crap? really?


Leonthecat said:
The SCOTUS is due to reinterpret the awkward and cryptic wording of the second.
They soon will.
States will have nothing to do with it.
Will you shoot a Supreme Court Justice if you don't like how he rules?
Click to expand...

that all depends....but in any government issue like this it will come to killing the cops first. As for killing justices, by the time we would actually get to them, we wouldn't have to. they'd simply be arrested, tried, then hung.
 
Flash said:
It just got reinterpreted in Heller. There is nothing a reinterpretation would do that cannot be currently done.
Click to expand...

The wording of the second, it has been shown, can be taken to mean contradictory intentions.

Modern justices, with attention and understanding of period wording, could see it as something entirely different from what has been seen before by past courts.
Justice Stevens has a good point, and the current court respects his views.
 
Micawber said:
I agree. Repeal and replace with some carefully drafted and specific language the limits magazines, ensures our cops and military have better arms than the criminals,
requires training and prohibits ownership by mental defectives. All should be registered, all parts should be traceable. Each gun should be prefired and the FEDERAL government
have its rifling thumbprint. Owners should be strictly liable for harm, including harm by private hypothecation and some later felony. Tons of things need to be done
and they should all be spelled out. The stupid militia language removed, the regulation specifically enumerated. The not infringed removed.

I 10 munutes I could save a million lives and hunters could still kill bambi. This country is filled overflowing with paranoid morons.
Click to expand...

you really don't understand what the founders tried to create, do you?
 
Leonthecat said:
The wording of the second, it has been shown, can be taken to mean contradictory intentions.

Modern justices, with attention and understanding of period wording, could see it as something entirely different from what has been seen before by past courts.
Justice Stevens has a good point, and the current court respects his views.
Click to expand...

It means I can own any gun I want to. What part of "militia" don't you understand?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top