Romney is not fiscally conservitive, and neither are you.
I didn't ounce here him talk about liberty, and opportunity.
He's not for getting rid of the income tax.
He's not for to get rid of prohibition. Which means more tax payers are taken off the streets for the tax payers to feed.
He wasn't going to bring our troops home.
He wasn't going to push to have Federal Reserve audited.
Based on his past history, he wasn't going to cut spending.
He's a religious nut, which means there's never enough prisons.
He said he was going to replace Obamacare. Stupid thing to say. Repeal would be more than enough.
He said that he wanted to have the gov't crack down harder on performance-enhancing drugs in sports. Which is absolutely none of the gov'ts business.
I could go on and on but what's the point.
The guys a Marxist.
I can't wait to see who you "National Socialist" nominate 3 1/2 years from now.
None of the things you listed are tenants of Marxism. You should seriously consider a remedial course on Marxism, or... just sit back and watch it be implemented in the US over the next four years. When Obama is done "transforming America" you can come back and tell me how Romney is NOT a Marxist, okay?
Your rant is part and parcel of what I am talking about. Conservatives are eating their own. You favor a radical extremist who will completely dismantle huge sectors of government, make drugs legal, bring troops home, get rid of income tax, etc. The thing is, that's not ever going to happen in the practical reality we all live in. It doesn't matter how "conservative" you claim to be, the reality of what is going to happen is far removed from what you have convinced yourself is possible. By clinging to your pipe dream (pun intended), you have helped to elect a Marxist, and over the next 4 years, you'll get to experience that reality with the rest of us.
I guess we can hope that we'll still be allowed to have elections in 4 years, but really... what's the point? If people like you are going to cling to a fantasy and not understand that we live in reality, and that everyone doesn't see things the same way as you, then we're still pretty much screwed. Our ONLY hope, is to unite all conservatives under one conservative umbrella, where we understand that we can't have everything we want all the time, and that we have to accept the views of others and try to find common ground, instead of tearing each other apart and being defiant.
I AM a fiscal conservative, but that doesn't mean that I expect fiscal conservative extremism. It certainly doesn't mean I am willing to accept Marxism because I can't get the extreme fiscal conservatism I might personally like to have. I have offered a path to reuniting conservatives on social conservative issues, by making the argument about the rights of states and people to decide and not the federal government. That takes issues like abortion, gay marriage, and legal weed, off the table. If we advocate Federalism instead of Statism, it removes these issues and the Liberals can't attack us or make people look stupid with "gotchya" questions. Now, I don't really know how to reunite libertarian conservatives, because it seems you are all hell bent and unwilling to vote for a GOP candidate, regardless of who they are. There is a 1 in 350 million chance the GOP will nominate someone with your exact word view, it's far more likely, whoever they nominate, is going to differ to some degree with what you personally believe. I've never voted for anyone who had the same exact views as mine, all the way down the line, that's not realistic. I am pragmatic enough to understand we have to crawl before we walk, and a moderate centrist republican president, would have been considerably better than a Marxist. I would have preferred a strong fiscal conservative like Ronald Reagan, but such a person didn't run.
