RUH ROH - Trump Lynching in Trouble.

Suggesting both parties are being treated the same is ignoring reality and is ignoring history.
Both parties treat the other just the same--engage in useless hearings to keep negative news before the public and give members of Congress the opportunity to read statements and attack the witness.

If one party does not want to be investigated for criminal activity, they should not conspire to overturn elections.
 
Wrong, the founders set it up so the President is in charge of such things. He clearly could do it, he simply could have had it announced that they did not have enough evidence. The people hate Trump enough they would still support Biden.

Trump did it with Bannon.
It's clear from the trial that in Bagman's case the government has overwhelming evidence.
 
Both parties treat the other just the same--engage in useless hearings to keep negative news before the public and give members of Congress the opportunity to read statements and attack the witness.

If one party does not want to be investigated for criminal activity, they should not conspire to overturn elections.
So why haven't the Democrats been convicted of their election fraud?
 
It's not his job to decide if it's real or not.

He's an officer of the court whose duty is to report every possible irregularity, no matter how likely it may be that it will turn out to be nothing.

It's called doing one's duty.

Something a Trumper would never understand because your cult leader hero never did his.
Why do you think it is his duty? Site your quote and source, please.
 
If Merchan didn't think it was real, we would have never heard about it.
When it was received, he had an obligation to treat it as real until proven otherwise. Bomb threats are treated the same way.

But, you’re a fucking idiot and that thought never crossed your mind.
 
But the Prosecution (Biden) could have dropped the charges at any time, or not have brought any charges.
Appearance of impropriety is against the rules.

Because it undermines public faith in the judicial system.
 
When it was received, he had an obligation to treat it as real until proven otherwise. Bomb threats are treated the same way.

But, you’re a fucking idiot and that thought never crossed your mind.
You have NO proof that he was obligated. :thup:
 
To treat alleged juror misconduct in his case as real, stupid fuck.

Are you as stupid as you portray or do you just put it on for this forum?

Yo'dawg thinks he's Clarence Thomas just because they both share the same moral compass and code of ethics.

Among other things.
 
Back
Top