Scientism

[Into the Night]

I am not surprised you have never heard off non-Euclidean geometry.

An arc is not a line, Sock.

 

[Into the Night]

That's not what I wrote.
I wrote that the shortest distance on a sphere is not a straight azimuthal compass direction, but following the arc of the great circle between two points on the Earth.

You wouldn't even know an arc of a great circle on a sphere was without frantically googling.

It is what you wrote. Don't try to deny your own posts, Sock.

 

[Into the Night]

You're arguing with an irrational liar. Everyone can read your post and anyone who pays attention to Sybil knows he's a liar and probably insane.

An arc is not a line, Sock.

 

[Geeko Sportivo]

And what about the things science can’t explain?

Do you just ignore them?

Can Science explain Jesus, or how he was conceived, or how he went to heaven?

No! Can Religion?

No? Religion has never been able to explain it to me in a way that it is believable either!

 

[Into the Night]

...and gfm7175. Unless they are identical triplets who grew together in the same cardboard box, they are all the same person. Hence, "Sybil".

Two separate people, Sock. Inversion fallacy.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

An arc is not a line, Sock.

^^^
Proof Sybil is insane.

YALSA

YALSA

YALSA.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Two separate people,


Sock. Inversion fallacy.

^^^
Well known psychotic liar.

Funny that you say "two separate people" when three accounts were mentioned, Sybil. LOL

YALSA

YALSA

YALSA.

 

[IBDaMann]

He's right and you're not.

You are the one who has it backwards. Into the Night is correct. All lines are curves but not all curves are lines. An arc is an example of a curve that is not a line.

Don't be afraid to come to me with the hard stuff.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

You are the one who has it backwards. Into the Night is correct. All lines are curves but not all curves are lines. An arc is an example of a curve that is not a line.

Don't be afraid to come to me with the hard stuff.

Your sock?

 

[IBDaMann]

He's wrong...but so are you.

Once again, Into the Night is correct and you err.

Axioms, the foundational statements of a closed system, are always held to be self evident and thus are always assumed to be TRUE in all arguments/theorems of that system such that they do not even need to be mentioned. Postulates, on the other hand, are only considered TRUE in those arguments in which they are postulated.

There is a school of thought (to which I subscribe) that holds that once a theorem is proven, it becomes an axiom, i.e. the original axioms are sort of the "null axioms" and proven theorems become "derived axioms" that don't need to be proven again and again and again. They only need to be proven once and they hold true in all arguments of that system, just as the null axioms, with the only difference being that they still need to be cited/mentioned when supporting an argument whereas null-axioms do not.

Cypress' problem (in this particular case) is that he doesn't understand logic, math, or "closed functional systems." He believes that abruptly switching from one closed functional system to another is somehow valid. He believes that Into the Night is somehow mistaken about Euclidean geometry by mentioning that there exist non-Euclidean geometries. Cypress isn't even courteous enough to credit me for having originally taught him about non-Euclidean geometries.

Don't be afraid to come to me with the hard stuff.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Once again, Into the Night is correct and you err.

I love it when you talk to or about yourself, Sybil.

 

[Saint Guinefort]

I love it when you talk to or about yourself, Sybil.

Do what you ALWAYS do and demand someone ban them!

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Do what you ALWAYS do and demand someone ban them!

I like it better when they are stupid enough to get themselves banned. More sporting that way. LOL

 

[Saint Guinefort]

I like it better when they are stupid enough to get themselves banned. More sporting that way. LOL

Doesn't seem to stop you though. You go runnin' to the mods or you demand someone ban people. It seems to be your jam.

"MOMMY! I don't get my way! I want them BAAAAAAANNNNED."

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Doesn't seem to stop you though. You go runnin' to the mods or you demand someone ban people. It seems to be your jam.

"MOMMY! I don't get my way! I want them BAAAAAAANNNNED."

If they break a rule, I'm obligated to report them. So are you.

 

[Saint Guinefort]

If they break a rule, I'm obligated to report them. So are you.

Hey ban hammer boi! You got me banned from Relativity! Good job!

Do you feel safer now?

Widdle "hewicopto piwot"

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Hey ban hammer boi! You got me banned from Relativity! Good job!

Do you feel safer now?

Widdle "hewicopto piwot"

I didn't do, dumbass, but I certainly supported it just like I support you being thread banned from this and any thread where all you do is troll and act like a retarded douchebag.

 

[Saint Guinefort]

I didn't do, dumbass, but I certainly supported it just like I support you being thread banned from this and any thread where all you do is troll and act like a retarded douchebag.

Like you do most of the time posting all your "cocksucker" memes?

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Like you do most of the time posting all your "cocksucker" memes?

Who do I post those memes to, Perry? Good, honest and intelligent people or the trolls, liars, losers and mentally deficient?

 

[Saint Guinefort]

Who do I post those memes to, Perry?

Pretty much everyone so far as I can tell. Granted you reserve "cocksucker" when you are talking about Helicopter Pilots but other than that you ALWAYS make up hateful memes for people.

In fact I'd venture to suggest hate-posts make up easily 75% of your postings.