Those would be best
As democrats always are for the economy
and always have a better economic record
Oh, really? So the Senate can decide to keep the Court at 8 justices?
They don't have a constitutional duty to fill vacancies? Really?
For freeloaders and leeches who want something for nothing maybe.
If a kid's own parents won't invest in his/her college, it doesn't sound like a good investment to me. Sanders thinks the rest of us should do for a kid what his own parents have figured out isn't a good idea.
For freeloaders and leeches who want something for nothing maybe.
If a kid's own parents won't invest in his/her college, it doesn't sound like a good investment to me. Sanders thinks the rest of us should do for a kid what his own parents have figured out isn't a good idea.
Does anyone really believe that this is what the founding fathers intended? That they said the President shall appoint justices, except for the last year of their tenure?
1) Yes... the Senate can indeed decide to not accept the nomination of the President. If they were required to accept the President's nomination, there would be no need to vote.
2) Yes, they have a duty to fill vacancies. But they do NOT have to vote yes to whomever the President nominates. It is called checks and balances.
And you think it's acceptable for the Senate to decide to wait a full year on the latter for purely partisan reasons?
I'm okay with an honest vote on a nominee. But a vote or lack of vote simply to delay is not in keeping w/ our principles, imo. I hope the GOP pays dearly for it.
If they delay Hillary might appoint Obama
Dude, was asking for proof that The Courts have the power to invalidate unconstitutional laws.
I am so amused watching the democrat party on JPP feign shock at politicians acting well, political.
Shocking isn't it?
Of course when their side acts political they don't seem to mind so much. Only when the GOP acts political. Unfortunately, I fear another episode of Republican Failure Theatre where they make overtures about taking on Obama but caving like the pussies they are when push comes to shove.
Middle class whites focus on the lower class minorities.
Rich democrats focus on the rich
how do you suggest we come to an agreement on the interpitation of the document?
I'm not shocked, and Democrats would do the same thing if the situation was reversed.
But, they need to be held accountable for willfully ignoring their responsibilities. Voters shouldn't tolerate this kind of stuff from either party.