No, I'm not a conservative and I'm respectful of his family.
You have no respect for yourself. That's easy to see based on what you believe.
No, I'm not a conservative and I'm respectful of his family.
Democrats should play the Republicans game, if a Republican wins, filibuster nominee until the next election in four years. The Republicans love to part dirty, the Democrats should stop being such goody two shoes.
You just made me snort in my coffee. Thanks.
Shit's going to hit the fan now. This could be a game changer in how our government operates. No way does his replacement get nominated. A qualified individual should be nominated and confirmed but I doubt like hell it happens. There's a good chance Dems could come out of this with the White House, SCOTUS and the Senate.
Oddly enough this could sink both Bernie, Trump and Cruz. I don't think either party or more correctly, their constituents, are going to support them with a SCOTUS Justice seat at stake.
There's more than one way to look at it. Obama could surprise everyone [including the voters] by nominating an actual moderate instead of a 'check the box' leftist minority who thinks animals have constitutional rights or some bat crazy shit. If he were to do that, yes, the electorate would have a right to be pissed at republicans for dragging it out.
But if Obama puts up another leftist ideologue and the republicans vote him or her without a fight, then the voters will be pissed at the republicans. Because we all know stacking the court is dirty little game that conflicts with the separation of powers.
There is zero chance he will put up a moderate so its going to get interesting.
I think political junkies like us are going to be surprised at how *little* this impacts the election. Just like we were all caught off guard by the ascendancy of Trump.
Voters are crawling out of the woodwork and getting involved because the country is going into a survival mode. That video of the Carrier plant employees being told their jobs are going to Mexico was pretty powerful, more than at any time in the past. Probably because we now know for certain there will be no future jobs for those folks. They're screwed.
Europe is being invaded, Iran is nuking up, and the Arab Spring is probably going to be the Arab Decade.
Our GDP is artificially inflated with government spending, our economy is artificially inflated through quantitative easing and printed funny money, and debt run amok.
When the ship goes down and 20 people are in a lifeboat in the middle of the ocean, rationing out a shared canteen of water, they're not going to spend much time discussing the relative merits of school prayer, abortion, gay marriage, and Constitutionalism.
Of the current candidates, Cruz is the only one I trust to do the right thing on judges. We need a President Cruz. Then we need Breyer, Stevens and Ginsberg to all die within three months of Cruz being sworn in. Then we pack the court with Scalia/Thomas clones and reverse 50 years of liberalism
I don't disagree with any of that. I just think at this point it's a little bit "Inside Baseball" for a country on the brink.
The GOP would be wise to let the Dems ramble on about abortion and the court. People are responding to the big picture message.
Best thing Trump could do right now would be to say he'd appoint Ted Cruz to the Supreme Court. Win-win.
OK, I have to call you on this, please explain to me why Obama's appointments are leftist ideologues? Because they have vaginas?There's more than one way to look at it. Obama could surprise everyone [including the voters] by nominating an actual moderate instead of a 'check the box' leftist minority who thinks animals have constitutional rights or some bat crazy shit. If he were to do that, yes, the electorate would have a right to be pissed at republicans for dragging it out.
But if Obama puts up another leftist ideologue and the republicans vote him or her without a fight, then the voters will be pissed at the republicans. Because we all know stacking the court is dirty little game that conflicts with the separation of powers.
There is zero chance he will put up a moderate so its going to get interesting.
OK, I have to call you on this, please explain to me why Obama's appointments are leftist ideologues? Because they have vaginas?
It also depends on public pressure. If enough pressure is placed on the senate that they see they could lose their seat if they don't confrm a justice than a justice would be confirmed.
LOL unfortunately for ya'll in the trailer park crowd Cruz is so far out on the lunatic fringe and so obnoxious and disliked that he couldn't get elected dog catcher in most the nation.I don't disagree with any of that. I just think at this point it's a little bit "Inside Baseball" for a country on the brink.
The GOP would be wise to let the Dems ramble on about abortion and the court. People are responding to the big picture message.
Best thing Trump could do right now would be to say he'd appoint Ted Cruz to the Supreme Court. Win-win.
That or you don't know what an ideologue is.I know. Your side are NEVER ideologues. Well, because they share YOUR ideology.
The next eight years are critical to packing the court with activist conservatives.
We cannot allow Obama to put someone else on the court. This is life and death now
There's more than one way to look at it. Obama could surprise everyone [including the voters] by nominating an actual moderate instead of a 'check the box' leftist minority who thinks animals have constitutional rights or some bat crazy shit. If he were to do that, yes, the electorate would have a right to be pissed at republicans for dragging it out.
But if Obama puts up another leftist ideologue and the republicans vote him or her without a fight, then the voters will be pissed at the republicans. Because we all know stacking the court is dirty little game that conflicts with the separation of powers.
There is zero chance he will put up a moderate so its going to get interesting.
Of the current candidates, Cruz is the only one I trust to do the right thing on judges. We need a President Cruz. Then we need Breyer, Stevens and Ginsberg to all die within three months of Cruz being sworn in. Then we pack the court with Scalia/Thomas clones and reverse 50 years of liberalism
That or you don't know what an ideologue is.
Ideologue - an adherent of an ideology who is uncompromising and dogmatic. Hmmmmm I wonder who that sounds like? [/sarcasm]