Should Obama toughen up on immigration

AssHatZombie said:
This view is an abstract view of the entire system, as if you don't exist inside it. This abstract version of "health" means nothing when your lifestyle is destroyed through social engineering projects executed by internationalist fascists to increase their power.
Click to expand...

Like a growing economy?
 
Obama can't move right on it!

He is a flaming 'Commie'...known as a progressive 'socialist' 'che' would not approve...are you people really that dense...or are the drugs speaking for your mind...whatever is left?:rolleyes:
 
blackasamoron, legal immigrants have been coming in.
Only in the last couple decades has illegals been pouring in.
Your politically retarded if you think being pro amnesty is not going to hurt Obamanation.
 
Topspin said:
blackasamoron, legal immigrants have been coming in.
Only in the last couple decades has illegals been pouring in.
Your politically retarded if you think being pro amnesty is not going to hurt Obamanation.
Click to expand...

Of course, because there's a big difference between legal immigrants streaming in and illegal immigrants streaming in. Under the founders immigration policy, there was no "illegal immigration".
 
cawacko said:
was there a previous decade or century you wish we were more like now?
Click to expand...

Most of them in this regard, when subverting immigration policy would have been considered out of bounds as a cost cutting measure.

Is the role of government just to make sure money changes hands regardless of the impact on citizens? Wouldn't kiddy porn contribute to the GDP? Let's make that legal. Anything less would be Ludditic.







Pwnded.
 
watergerber, are you on crack.
Your still on daddy's allowance you are not allowed to introduce simple econmics to me.
Like Shaq said about Bill waltons feeble attempt to critisize him "I'd bitch slap Bill Walton like I did greg ostertag if bill were still playing". I'm bitchslapping you watergerber. Carpenters build houses, houses go up way more than overall inflation.
YOUVE been owned.
 
AssHatZombie said:
Most of them in this regard, when subverting immigration policy would have been considered out of bounds as a cost cutting measure.

Is the role of government just to make sure money changes hands regardless of the impact on citizens? Wouldn't kiddy porn contribute to the GDP? Let's make that legal. Anything less would be Ludditic.







Pwnded.
Click to expand...


There has never been a time when new technology/innovations have not caused a loss of jobs.
 
Watermark said:
Of course, because there's a big difference between legal immigrants streaming in and illegal immigrants streaming in. Under the founders immigration policy, there was no "illegal immigration".
Click to expand...
There was, however, a stopping point where newcomers identified themselves and were checked for diseases.
 
Topspin said:
watergerber, are you on crack.
Your still on daddy's allowance you are not allowed to introduce simple econmics to me.
Like Shaq said about Bill waltons feeble attempt to critisize him "I'd bitch slap Bill Walton like I did greg ostertag if bill were still playing". I'm bitchslapping you watergerber. Carpenters build houses, houses go up way more than overall inflation.
YOUVE been owned.
Click to expand...

LMAO!!! Bringing out Shaq Daddy quotes...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top