Texas has declared war on the United States. Other Governors are joining

[gfm7175]

how could Marbury establish judicial review if it was already in the Constitution? hint, IT COULDN'T!!!!!!!

now, here's some FACTS for you.
1. Marbury is, in part, a usurped power. If it was already a prescribed power, then it wouldn't have established judicial review.
2. If one needs to hold on to Marbury as the courts are the final arbiter of the Constitution, then how is it that we the people can amend it?
3. the other part of Marbury that people, like you, have to ignore is the part where it says that any law repugnant to the Constitution is null and void..........but how does that work? Can the people determine whats null and void and just ignore an unconstitutional law? try that and tell me how it works for you.

bottom line, Marbury is a usurped power. The courts took away the peoples power to determine what is and isn't Constitutional and made you a stupider person for it.

VERY well said!

 

[Into the Night]

The law does not allow that, so no.

See Title 8, $1227 and related law, Sock.

 

[Into the Night]

Abbott doesn't deport them. He ships them around the country.

Biden is doing that. You cannot blame Gov Abbot for Biden's problems.

 

[Into the Night]

Which the law allows him to do. He can't kick them back over the border so he sends them to the sanctuary cities where they will be safe and cared for until their court dates.

They don't have court dates, Sock. You are hallucinating again.

 

[Into the Night]

And everyone else involved in American jurisprudence for 221 years.

You don't get to speak for everyone plus the dead, Sock. Omniscience fallacy.

You know absolutely nothing about the law.

You are describing yourself again, Sock. You cannot project YOUR problem on anybody else.

You're wrong.

He's right. Go read Article III of the Constitution of the United States.

If there was a grain of truth in your fanciful delusion, Marbury would be challenged and ultimately overturned.

The Supreme Court is not the Constitution, Sock.

 

[Into the Night]

What? Are you now talking about criminal law? If you have any self respect whatsoever, I suggest you drop this absurd farce.

Trying to pivot won't work, Sock.

 

[Into the Night]

Smoochie whoochie!

You are trolling again, Phanty. No argument presented.

 

[Concart]

KSpam alert.

 

[ExpressLane]

KSpam alert.

Isn't it time ti make your Uber Eats dinner run. Get moving boy you don't want to loose this job too.

 

[Hawkeye10]

Texas as every right to protect themselves from the illegal illegitimate regime in Washington....the right to defend oneself overrides governments....no government has the right to take that away.

 

[Diesel]

you are clearly too naive to understand how power corrupts. is your 'faith' in the judiciary that unshakeable that you accept that abortion was never a Constitutional right?

Is your extremism so ingrained that you think the judiciary was corrupted 221 years and no one bothered to fix it or challenge Marbury?

Marshall said, “It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.” That is the standing case law. If you honestly think you're right, in which case you're intellectually doomed, then find yourself an attorney willing to take the case.

I'll save you some time. You won't because you can't because you're deliriously wrong.

 

[Diesel]

don't get all butthurt because you're shitty position now faces a hurdle.

It doesn't face a hurdle. You lost, and you're now acting like a child. You slung a non sequitur, took your ball, and went home.

 

[Diesel]

KSpam alert.

For real. I have him on ignore and still see uninterrupted pages of only his name. The guy's nuts.

 

[Diesel]

Isn't it time ti make your Uber Eats dinner run. Get moving boy you don't want to loose this job too.

It's time for some new material. You've been doing that Uber Eats bit multiple times a day for months. It's boring.

 

[Sailor]

It doesn't face a hurdle. You lost, and you're now acting like a child. You slung a non sequitur, took your ball, and went home.

You limp dick illegal fuck.When and where have you ever served this country??????????? Put up or shut up .

 

[Concart]

It's time for some new material. You've been doing that Uber Eats bit multiple times a day for months. It's boring.

Oh is he still yammering on about that. I wouldn’t know.

 

[Diesel]

You limp dick illegal fuck.When and where have you ever served this country??????????? Put up or shut up .

Are you drunk again?

 

[Diesel]

Oh is he still yammering on about that. I wouldn’t know.

Probably better that way.

 

[Into the Night]

Texas as every right to protect themselves from the illegal illegitimate regime in Washington....the right to defend oneself overrides governments....no government has the right to take that away.

While Texas has the inherent right to defend itself, there IS a line of demarcation specified in the Constitution of the United States IF that State wishes to remain a member of the Union.

No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.

Thus:
* Every State has the right to enforce it's own laws.
* Every State has the right to defend itself from invasion, and to even go to war to repel such invasion. Yes...that includes forming and activating a militia, which may even include a State navy.
* Every State has the right to call upon allies to fulfill these rights.
* Every State has the right to take action if in danger of invasion or war IF there is insufficient time for Congress to act.

The federal government was formed to act as a common defense (among other things), but that does NOT relinquish the right of a State like Texas to defend itself from invasion, even if that invasion is supported by the President or Congress (which itself is an act of treason by said President or Congress).

The Constitution of the United States is quite clear on this. No court has the authority to interpret or change the Constitution nor to deny any State of these inherent rights of self defense.

Further:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

* Every State has the authority to organized and activate a militia (subject to the limitations of Article I).
* Every person has the authority to keep and bear arms (weapons, any kind of weapon), and to use that weapon to defend themselves (the inherent right of self defense), their families, their communities, and their State, and the Constitution of the United States (yes, even from a rogue government that does not honor that constitution).

If ANY State is attacked by the so-called 'federal' government or any agent thereof, that State has all the authority it needs to repel such an attack and to call upon allies to assist it.

Texas does not stand alone. 26 States have responded to the call. Of the 47 States remaining in the Union, that's a majority of them. That is 27 out of 47 States.

Before Biden decides to start a civil war (which he has called for several times, another act of treason), he had better do some serious navel gazing about the cost of doing so. He is far outnumbered and outgunned, and the rank and file of his military are NOT going to war upon their own towns and families.

 

[Into the Night]

Is your extremism so ingrained

The extremism is YOURS. You cannot project YOUR problem on anybody else, Sock.

that you think the judiciary was corrupted 221 years and no one bothered to fix it or challenge Marbury?

No court has the authority to interpret or change the Constitution of the United States nor any State constitution.

Marshall said, “It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.” That is the standing case law. If you honestly think you're right, in which case you're intellectually doomed, then find yourself an attorney willing to take the case.

I'll save you some time. You won't because you can't because you're deliriously wrong.

No, it isn't. No court has the authority to write law. Only Congress has that authority.
Read Article III of the Constitution of the United States to see what courts DO have the authority to do.