the federalist papers, the documents which kill all the right wing memes

The major flaw in the Communist Manifesto is its insane philosophy that’s contrary to human nature. Since its philosophy is pie-in-the-sky absurd its promoters find it necessary to force feed it with whips guns and gulags. It is humorous that you should insinuate that communism has something to do with absolute liberation. Absolute liberation is Anarchy the other failed philosophy.

Fact is wherever there are humans there will be government. The US Constitution recognizes that fact and thereby sets limits on government while guaranteeing human and individual rights.

You've used that argument before, only to have it shot down. So, again: What part of human nature prevents communism? Opposition to authority? Self interest? Mutual aid? The need to express yourself? Sociability?

It's external factors that've kept communism from coming into existence for a sustained period of time. Like the pre-revolution economic conditions of China and Russia. And the overwhelming military pressures from capitalisms.
 
peasant
n.
1. A member of the class constituted by small farmers and tenants, sharecroppers, and laborers on the land where they form the main labor force in agriculture.

2: a usually uneducated person of low social status
m-w.com​

: a member of a European class of persons tilling the soil as small landowners or as laborers; also : a member of a similar class elsewhere
m-w.com​
 
You're not using the class definition.

Your post talked about a peasant class, but your definition refers to a broad blanket type of individual.
 
peasant
n.
1. A member of the class constituted by small farmers and tenants, sharecroppers, and laborers on the land where they form the main labor force in agriculture.

2: a usually uneducated person of low social status
m-w.com​

: a member of a European class of persons tilling the soil as small landowners or as laborers; also : a member of a similar class elsewhere
m-w.com​

You don't get to choose the variant meaning of the words that I use. Only I can do that.
 
copgtfo.jpg
 
The Democratic Party of yesteryear had little to no relationship with modern day Democrats and the Party of today. Aside from the historical Democrat’s support for a Bill Of Rights for white men they were mostly slave owners raised up in an environment with the notion that people of color were inferior to whites and were devoid of human rights. They also were raised up in an environment with the notion that women were property. They ratified the original Constitution because it protected and did not abolish slavery. Their insistence on a Bill Of Rights was to protect their “Slave State’s Rights.” They were products of their political environment. They were first and foremost “Republicans” i. e. believing in a “limited” federal government and strong State Government. They agreed to the Amendment Process in the Constitution because most like Jefferson and Madison were evolving in their ideas about slavery and believed that future generations would surely abolish it.

All one needs to do is read, read, read the biographies of Jefferson and Madison to understand their political environment and their evolving opposition to the slavery they participated in but didn’t live to observe the end of . They were never “democrats” because they never believed in “democracy” in any superior ideological construction of government but rather only supported the idea that government should be elected to office by “democratic” elections but governed by the “rule of law as established in the Constitution.”

They did not invent slavery they were born into it just like the blacks were born into it. They were products of their environment. Not an excuse, just the facts!!!

I see little difference between the party of slavery and the party of abortion.
 
You've used that argument before, only to have it shot down. So, again: What part of human nature prevents communism? Opposition to authority? Self interest? Mutual aid? The need to express yourself? Sociability?

It's external factors that've kept communism from coming into existence for a sustained period of time. Like the pre-revolution economic conditions of China and Russia. And the overwhelming military pressures from capitalisms.

The idea of communal living, equal sharing, equal work production, “from each by their own ability, to each by their own need,” the vanishing and or unnecessary government folly. Everything about communism is pie-in-the-sky absurdity totally contrary to human nature. The only way people will equally share is by force. Force is government. The only way people will work is either for their own individual benefit or because they’re forced to work. Force is government, government is force. The only way people can peacefully live together is when they have the freedom to bargain with one another for their own benefit. Communism ignores human jealousy, the inequality of humans, the unequal ambition of humans, the unequal intelligence of humans, the unequal physical abilities and unequal talents of humans.

The old Soviet minion’s saying about communism just about says it all, “They pretend to pay us so we pretend to work.”

“The overwhelming military pressures from capitalism?” How fucking absurd is that? Are we to believe that the truest of communist believes that the world is not a dangerous place and individuals and nations need not acquire the means of self-defense? That alone of course is evidence of the pure folly of purist communism.

The proof that communism doesn’t work is the pure fact that every nation that ever claimed it did not abolish government but rather established the ever fierce force of government, because communism is impossible without the force of government. Communism’s forced sharing and forced workers programming and social engineering only created a nation of slaves robed of their god given individualism, national economic conditions that became more and more unbearable and a living standard of squalor and even starvation and national governments in bankruptcy and scrambling to adopt capitalism before the revolutionaries overthrew them and stomped a fucking mud hole in their communist asses.
 
go get the time in history when capitalism unfettered woirked out well?


If you dont fetter it with wise laws it does not remain caplitalism for long
 
You keep repeating the same idea, but there's been no response to my assertions. Because this really isn't a discussion, I'll make a brief post and duck out of the thread.

Communism didn't fail because it ran contrary to human nature - just the opposite. Communism addresses the basic needs of men and women to be expressed and to control the course of their life. By giving absolute democratic control in the hands of the individual, and by eliminating needless power dynamics (Man to woman, government to citizen, employer to employee, for example) a society can function effectively. Your mistake is to apply the competition, jealously and self degradation experienced in capitalism to a society where none of these things have any external support system.

But it failed because the countries that folks tried it in weren't capable of having it. Marx made it very clear that a massive proletariat must exist in order to facilitate communism. It's also widely accepted that the country must have democratic experience. Lenin and Mao disagreed, moving the revolutions against these assertions. They were wrong. And, for whatever reason, they realized this after coming to power. Thus, the state oppression and forced industrialization began - because they realized that the country wasn't ready to be communal, and rejected the idea that a liberal democracy should be used to develop the infrastructure/culture instead of an authoritarian state.
 
You keep repeating the same idea, but there's been no response to my assertions. Because this really isn't a discussion, I'll make a brief post and duck out of the thread.

Every linguistic intercourse is a “discussion” even a debate if you have the balls to face your opponent and articulate rationally. Notice that where you’re concerned I use the word “rationally” loosely.

Communism didn't fail because it ran contrary to human nature - just the opposite. Communism addresses the basic needs of men and women to be expressed and to control the course of their life. By giving absolute democratic control in the hands of the individual,

But democracy isn’t “individualism” it’s collectivism and absolute democracy is just another unworkable ideology and often nothing less than mob rule. You use the word “individual,” but an individual thinker in a collective democracy would be a maverick a non-participator unless he/she agreed with every whim and want of the majority mob, in that case he/she would not be an individual thinker but rather a brain-dead, brainwashed moron. Communism supposes that all are equal thinkers of equal intelligence, equal ambitions, equal likes and dislikes, equal beauty and equal talent. Pure communism supposes that all things being equal government is unnecessary. Communism is totally out of sync with the reality of human nature.

and by eliminating needless power dynamics (Man to woman, government to citizen, employer to employee, for example) a society can function effectively. Your mistake is to apply the competition, jealously and self degradation experienced in capitalism to a society where none of these things have any external support system.

Oh! But they have every “external support” it’s known as “human nature.” Jealousy, competition and even self-degradation are all human nature, along with hatred, partisan-ism, fear, ambition and laziness. Who the fuck in their right mind will stand for a communist philosophy where all work is of equal importance and the lazy bastard that shirks his share of the collective work load is still entitled to a equal share of the imagined benefits? How many folks are willing to take the communist sharing philosophy to it’s perfect conclusion and share even their wives and husbands like the 60’s hippies tried on for size and found that “jealousy” ruled the day? How many women are willing to change the shitty diapers of the collective’s herd of confused children when the mothers thereof are napping in a quite hideout? Where is the authority but with a government. Who is the government? Who keeps the government moral and uncorrupted? Communism is folly of the most insane kind.

But it failed because the countries that folks tried it in weren't capable of having it.

BINGO!!!! They weren’t capable of shedding their “human nature” and becoming programmed drones and slaves to an absurd pie-in-the-sky folly because they were “humans.”

Marx made it very clear that a massive proletariat must exist in order to facilitate communism. It's also widely accepted that the country must have democratic experience. Lenin and Mao disagreed, moving the revolutions against these assertions. They were wrong. And, for whatever reason, they realized this after coming to power. Thus, the state oppression and forced industrialization began - because they realized that the country wasn't ready to be communal, and rejected the idea that a liberal democracy should be used to develop the infrastructure/culture instead of an authoritarian state.

So, now days y’all commies are believing that a socialist democracy in Europe and America will eventually install communism in the western world. Well, let’s see how y’all are doing. Since you have managed the abandonment of the Constitution in America, we’ve become a nation of the bribery, by the bribed and for the bribed. Government isn’t shrinking, government is growing by leaps and bounds. National debt is ungodly, rights and freedoms are being challenged and prohibited. Communism is now called “progressivism.” We’re on the edge of bankruptcy, not because of any truer experience of capitalism, but rather because progressivism from both left and right has created a good ole boy crony capitalist bribery scam between Wall Street and the Federal Government.

Communism is an insane joke, a failed philosophy and an absurdity. It’s contrary to reality and human nature.

Only limited government constitutionalism is rationality, conducive of human and individual rights, prosperity and the pursuit of happiness.
 
Back
Top