There are no Red States. Only Red farms.

FREDO the FREELOADER said:
I AM A COWARD
HIDING I'M TAKING MONEY
LOVING UNCLE SAM​
Click to expand...
You don't have to admit you're a hypocrite and a loser who takes taxpayer dollars while you sit on your fat loser ass, Fredo.

You wouldn't be the first to justify being a hypocrite by saying "Everyone else is doing it too."
 
JesusAI said:
farmers are smarter than professional welfare recipients.
Click to expand...

American farmers receive a huge amount of government money, far more than welfare recipients. And they make up about 1% of the population. A lot of the other people who live in rural areas are completely dependent on government money.

It is a simple fact that Democrats live on highly productive land, and Republicans live on cheap, low productive land. They are not productive people, so are happy to live on cheap land.
 
Walt said:
American farmers receive a huge amount of government money, far more than welfare recipients. And they make up about 1% of the population. A lot of the other people who live in rural areas are completely dependent on government money.

It is a simple fact that Democrats live on highly productive land, and Republicans live on cheap, low productive land. They are not productive people, so are happy to live on cheap land.
Click to expand...

Define "productive". :)

Also, everyone should remember that they can't survive eating cars, computer chips or paper towels. All those highly productive Democrats should remember how quickly a city runs out of food when the trucks and trains stop running. LOL

The country is an ecosystem; the cities and rural areas are symbiotic. They should agree to agree on that idea.

fd64fa8cdacc038d73a5c281bd872268.jpg
 
Doc Dutch said:
Define "productive".
Click to expand...

The standard definition of land productivity would be goods and services produced per acre. You can reverse engineer that by looking at how much land costs per acre. So if you have particularly productive land, it costs a lot of money to buy. We notice quickly that Manhattan and Silicon Valley are painfully expensive, and productive. There are other parts of the country where you can buy land at less than $1,000 an acre, and actually do great on government welfare.

Doc Dutch said:
Also, everyone should remember that they can't survive eating cars, computer chips or paper towels.
Click to expand...

Most rural Republicans have nothing to do with farming, so they can not survive eating nothing. Meanwhile, you can sell non-agricultural production, and buy food. Much as farmers desperately need to sell their agricultural products to buy farming inputs which they do not produce. Modern farms use huge amounts of non-agricultural inputs that they cannot produce. This allows 1% of the people to produce so much agricultural goods.


Doc Dutch said:
All those highly productive Democrats should remember how quickly a city runs out of food when the trucks and trains stop running. LOL
Click to expand...

The cities are the easiest places to feed, compared to rural areas. When the trucks run out, the rural grocery stores will be completely out of food.
 
archives said:
And the irony is that those raising the most food are not the local small farmer as the right likes to think but rather large corporate farms often owned often by individuals living in those cities
Click to expand...

and yet, both brother in laws who farm in Iowa operate family operations which are incorporated for tax purposes.......most small local farmers are as well......I think perhaps you don't know what you are talking about......
 
Walt said:
The standard definition of land productivity would be goods and services produced per acre. You can reverse engineer that by looking at how much land costs per acre. So if you have particularly productive land, it costs a lot of money to buy. We notice quickly that Manhattan and Silicon Valley are painfully expensive, and productive. There are other parts of the country where you can buy land at less than $1,000 an acre, and actually do great on government welfare.

Most rural Republicans have nothing to do with farming, so they can not survive eating nothing. Meanwhile, you can sell non-agricultural production, and buy food. Much as farmers desperately need to sell their agricultural products to buy farming inputs which they do not produce. Modern farms use huge amounts of non-agricultural inputs that they cannot produce. This allows 1% of the people to produce so much agricultural goods.

The cities are the easiest places to feed, compared to rural areas. When the trucks run out, the rural grocery stores will be completely out of food.
Click to expand...

Are you disagreeing it's a symbiotic relationship?

9fc549fb6bd3c87a032c6fd16122faba.jpg
Click to expand...
 
domer76 said:
Top universities in the US include:

Harvard
MIT
Stanford
Cal Tech
Princeton
Yale

All blue bastions

Funny how Buttfuck Bible College in Shitstain, Wyoming isn’t listed.
Know what the most difficult university to get into is?

Harvard

https://districtadministration.com/what-are-the-toughest-colleges-to-be-accepted-into-in-2023/

Checkmate, stupid fuck.
Click to expand...
I wonder why lib'ruls always look at MIT where the students are from Shitfuck, WY instead of the Boston public school system......
 
Doc Dutch said:
Are you disagreeing it's a symbiotic relationship?
Click to expand...

Republicans mostly live on non-productive rural land, so not much symbioticness going on there.

As for the real farms, they are nice to have in the USA, but could be replaced. When we were dependent on local farms, we would swerve between seasonal famine, and extreme famine. With a modern economy, we can buy food from where ever it is produced. And farms are more productive, because they have been industrialized. They are able to buy farming inputs. The world is much better off now than back in the days we were dependent on local farms.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
how many of them graduated from the local public school system.....
Click to expand...

Harvard pulls in students from all around the world, both public and private schools, though you would be surprised by how many come from the local public schools. Remember many of the factuality members educate their children in the local public schools. Rindge, the local public school, is world famously great. Much better than almost all the private "Christian" schools.
 
Walt said:
Republicans mostly live on non-productive rural land, so not much symbioticness going on there.

As for the real farms, they are nice to have in the USA, but could be replaced. When we were dependent on local farms, we would swerve between seasonal famine, and extreme famine. With a modern economy, we can buy food from where ever it is produced. And farms are more productive, because they have been industrialized. They are able to buy farming inputs. The world is much better off now than back in the days we were dependent on local farms.
Click to expand...

Disagreed. Since even the farmers don't want to drive 50 miles for into a small town for resupply.

Most human society is a balance. When it's out of balance, there's conflict. The fact our nation is so dysfunctional is, to a large degree, because there is conflict between urban and rural. It's been going on for decades now and hasn't been resolved.

http://www.cimulact.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Urban-rural-symbiosis.pdf
CHALLENGE
A better-balanced urban rural integration - considering the
diversity of rural areas (i.e. suburb, outer periphery, deep rural)
- is seen as vital for the quality of life for both urban and rural
citizens. There is widespread concern in different countries
about a declining quality of life in rural areas and
migration from the countryside to urban areas. They point
to the need for integration of spatial planning of cities and
rural areas to improve social, ecological and economic
sustainability while preserving the distinctiveness of each
space. Participatory governance is currently largely
missing. As a basis for solutions, a deeper understanding
of the diversity of situations is needed. Also we need more
differentiated notions than the simple rural/urban dichotomy -
city and countryside do not really stop at the border, the mayor’s
responsibility stops there, but we should consider the functional urban area.
Click to expand...
 
Demoralizing the enemies of the Revolution is a huge prong of the program, of the psyops war.

We are the victims...in the end we are to be slaves.
 
Walt said:
Harvard pulls in students from all around the world, both public and private schools, though you would be surprised by how many come from the local public schools.
Click to expand...

no I wouldn't......I already provided the statistics showing less than 16% come from anywhere in New England.....I expect most Harvard professors send their children to very expensive private schools.....

Rindge Technical is not THE public school......it is a special school for elites.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top