Into the Night
Verified User
Random phrases. No apparent coherency.
There are no Red States. Only Red farms.
- Thread starter Cypress
- Start date
Random phrases. No apparent coherency.
He must be from Harvard.
Twenty years ago I would have argued that possibility with you. Now, not so much.
NiftyNiblick
1960s Chick Magnet
Into the Night
Verified User
Heh. Twenty years ago, Harvard was a better school!
Into the Night
Verified User
IQ is a meaningless number. Argument from randU fallacy.
And? What is the point here? Eventually we'll all be left out of the process altogether because idiots who think beef comes in packages and don't realize that it is farmed/ranched will outbreed us, but what is your point? I agree, folks who live rurally are often more politically conservative than folks who live in the cities. I'm wondering why this came as such a shock to you.
Jade Dragon
And I'm the one that jaded you.
The point is Cypress countering TDAK's thread called, There are no blue states only blue cities.
That isn't checkmate, you're barely playing with checkers and pretending you know what castling is... the board is sort of the same, red is almost white...
Nothing you posted addresses whether or not one would have free speech if they were to go to Harvard.
This would be like claiming that because Brigham Young is in Utah and near the Mormon Tabernacle then it follows that there are more singers that go there (though this is an example of a good conservative college, that is also a non-sequitur), your post is a non-sequitur...
Original post is: Harvard has no free speech, they scored zero in that arena.
Your answer is: Well, it's hard to get into so...
Random Facts Dancing Alarm Has Gone Off:
This isn't the random facts about Harvard thread, and your post answered nothing in the post you quoted.
Here's you dropping the football before you score and then celebrating, followed by a link to a video of you doing it over and over:
You can return to the claim in post #4 for your answer, where one of the forum’s lemmings made a comment about red v blue intelligence.
Any minimal search will prove the opposite of what that moron wishes for.
That isn't checkmate, you're barely playing with checkers and pretending you know what castling is... the board is sort of the same, red is almost white...
Nothing you posted addresses whether or not one would have free speech if they were to go to Harvard.
This would be like claiming that because Brigham Young is in Utah and near the Mormon Tabernacle then it follows that there are more singers that go there (though this is an example of a good conservative college, that is also a non-sequitur), your post is a non-sequitur...
Original post is: Harvard has no free speech, they scored zero in that arena.
Your answer is: Well, it's hard to get into so...
Random Facts Dancing Alarm Has Gone Off:
This isn't the random facts about Harvard thread, and your post answered nothing in the post you quoted.
Here's you dropping the football before you score and then celebrating:
Original post is #4, Jethro. Intelligence. I never brought up the subject of free speech, nor was the thread going in that direction, shitweasel. The discussion had led to the intelligence of red v blue areas.
Every one of those schools require high IQ, high GPA to even qualify. And the populations surrounding them reflect that.
Try to keep up, nipplehead.
BYU is in Provo, asswipe. Not Salt Lake City. The singers in the choir are church members, not BYU students.
Mic drop. Walk away.
Just barely.
It's a spoof on the thread titled There are No Blue States. Only Blue Cities. Austin Texas is probably more liberal than rural upstate New York.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
A funnier point than the one TDAK made here: https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?208371-There-are-no-Blue-states-Only-Blue-cities
Democrats could not win anything without the big cities and all the negroz and gimmiegrants who collect welfare there and always vote for the welfare party.
Notice that TDAK put his thread in Current Events while Cypress used the more appropriate, IMO, General Politics.
FWIW, the conflict between Urban and Rural is not new. I favor Rural but know Urban is necessary as much as Rural. My major objection in this conflict are those who seek to pass One-Size-Fits-All laws that negatively impact one side, usually Rural, in favor of the side passing the laws, usually Urban. A primary example are gun laws.
From earlier in the thread:
From just one of the "smarter" colleges you listed. Not to mention those "smarter" students who signed letters of protest? They are being blacklisted among potential; employers. (this one you can screech at Shauneen Miranda who is responsible for the article)
Harvard students hold ‘die-in’ to demand end of ‘genocide in Gaza’ after signing letter blaming Israel for Hamas terrorist attack
Gomer, I know you have trouble figuring headlines out so if you have a bitch with this post, take it up with Nicholas McEntyre who wrote it.
Yep, some firms are rejecting them.
A Harvard Law School grad will have no problem finding a job, Cletus. I promise. But it is SO heartwarming that you are concerned with their well bring. Really it is.
But, ignorant fuck, if you bothered to read that letter, you would know that it does NOT ONCE mention Hamas. But you didn’t know that, did you? That’s because you’re willfully, ignorantly, lazy.
Kamala Trump
Verified User
farmers are smarter than professional welfare recipients.
NiftyNiblick
1960s Chick Magnet
farmers are smarter than professional welfare recipients.
Have subsidies ended or are farmers actually professional welfare recipients?
I haven't been keeping up with this.
Kamala Trump
Verified User
that's obvious.