These Are The Faces Of The 19th Amendment

Flanders said:
To Aimée: Democrat women are turning a constitutional Republic into a Socialist religion.


Click to expand...


Ruh roh! Gotta check the Illiterate Dumbfuck Club membership. Yep, I thought so. You were already there.

ILLITERATE DUMBFUCK CLUB

Earl
Howard Wolowitz
Bobb
Yurt
Flanders
#MAGA
Granule
It’s OK to be White
RB60
Text Drivers are Killers
Red Crow
countryboy
Tinfoil
ptif219
volsrock
Dark Soul
Virtue Signaller
Darth Omar
Eagle Eye
Legion
God Bless America
Teflon Don
CFM
I Love America
Right
Coolbreeze
NOVA
Guille
USFREEDOM911
Sailor
Robo
Getin the ring
Gazzaqueen
Evmetro
Alice in Liberaland
God Emperor
Callinectes
Wolverine
J Craft
Toxic Titties
Talcum X
Imperator
Boris the Animal
Fauxcahontas
tsuke
OldMercsRule
BigDog
Bull&Terrier
Yoda
Ooda
Felonia von Pantsuit
 
The decision deals the biggest legal blow to the Selective Service System since the Supreme Court upheld the draft in 1981. In Rostker v. Goldberg, the court ruled that the male-only draft was "fully justified" because women were ineligible for combat roles.

But U.S. District Judge Gray Miller ruled late Friday that while historical restrictions on women serving in combat "may have justified past discrimination," men and women are now equally able to fight. In 2015, the Pentagon lifted all restrictions for women in military service.
​


With women in combat roles, a federal court rules the male-only draft unconstitutional
Gregory Korte, USA TODAY Published 12:59 a.m. ET Feb. 24, 2019 | Updated 1:52 a.m. ET Feb. 24, 2019

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...nly-registration-unconstitutional/2968872002/
​

Here is a suggestion. Democrat women fight touchy-feely wars while decent women only fight wars that defend the country?
 
Flanders said:

To Aimée: America was the envy of the world before the XVI, XVII, and XIX Amendments. The country has been going downhill since 1913 —— 1920.

Repealing the XVI and XVII Amendments is at least possible, while the XIX Amendment is the most corrosive in that nobody dare suggest repeal. Hell, it is impossible to get Democrats to govern within the confines of the Constitution let alone keep filthy Democrat women out of government. Note that the XVI Amendment pays for everything filthy Socialist women do to this country.



To Aimée: I have a problem with hate-filled female Democrat scum using their office to betray this country at every turn. Every one of them is a sick freak who believes the Constitution is a license for them to govern by their personal moral compass.

Note that women voted for the Chicago sewer rat because he ran as a spiritual leader. Every one of the garbage running in 2020 expects to cash-in on the sewer rat’s campaign strategy.


Click to expand...

Uh Oh...looks like Ned has run out of lithium again.
 
Flanders said:
The decision deals the biggest legal blow to the Selective Service System since the Supreme Court upheld the draft in 1981. In Rostker v. Goldberg, the court ruled that the male-only draft was "fully justified" because women were ineligible for combat roles.

But U.S. District Judge Gray Miller ruled late Friday that while historical restrictions on women serving in combat "may have justified past discrimination," men and women are now equally able to fight. In 2015, the Pentagon lifted all restrictions for women in military service.
​


With women in combat roles, a federal court rules the male-only draft unconstitutional
Gregory Korte, USA TODAY Published 12:59 a.m. ET Feb. 24, 2019 | Updated 1:52 a.m. ET Feb. 24, 2019

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...nly-registration-unconstitutional/2968872002/
​

Here is a suggestion. Democrat women fight touchy-feely wars while decent women only fight wars that defend the country?
Click to expand...
Ahhh name the last woman who started a war? Helen of Troy?
 
go for it you fucking right wing idiots


piss off every demographic in the USA except white male gun owners


they don't make babies by themselves


you will then have NO new voters and will have only old dying men with horrible health problems as you voting base
 
Mott the Hoople said:
Ahhh name the last woman who started a war?
Click to expand...

To Matt the Hoople: Do a little research:

https://www.google.com/search?sourc......1..gws-wiz.....0..0i131j0j0i10.saDxAUaN08o

It is going to get much worse after the first Democrat woman president gets away with starting touchy-feely wars.

Mott the Hoople said:
Helen of Troy?
Click to expand...

To Matt the Hoople: Helen’s face launched a thousand ships. I suspect she was also a good lay.

Democrat feminazis are bum lays without beautiful faces. The only thing they need to start touchy-feely wars after they become commander in chiefette are pussy-whipped Democrat men.
 
Flanders said:
To Matt the Hoople: Do a little research:

https://www.google.com/search?sourc......1..gws-wiz.....0..0i131j0j0i10.saDxAUaN08o

It is going to get much worse after the first Democrat woman president gets away with starting touchy-feely wars.



To Matt the Hoople: Helen’s face launched a thousand ships. I suspect she was also a good lay.

Democrat feminazis are bum lays without beautiful faces. The only thing they need to start touchy-feely wars after they become commander in chiefette are pussy-whipped Democrat men.
Click to expand...
ROTFLMAO!

Now you can’t have it both ways Ned. You’re contradicting yourself. Do they start wars or don’t they? No war is touchy-feely cause there’s no such thing as a happy ending when you’re dead.

So which is it Ned? Do you want conservative men to govern cause they go to war the old fashioned way, by being bone headed fuck ups, like W was, or do you want women to govern cause they couldn’t be that incompetent to start a war?

You can’t have it both ways Ned. It’s either or. Make your choice buddy. :)
 
CFM said:
Because that majority of women that vote for Democrats think someone having between her legs what the one voting has between hers means qualified.
Click to expand...

No, it's because there is a lot of sexism on the Right, as this thread shows. Why would women vote for the side that wants to reduce them to second class citizens?
 
StoneByStone said:
No, it's because there is a lot of sexism on the Right, as this thread shows. Why would women vote for the side that wants to reduce them to second class citizens?
Click to expand...

Not thinking women aren't qualified because they're female isn't sexism. People like you that vote for female candidates solely because of their gender is sexism.
 
CFM said:
Not thinking women aren't qualified because they're female isn't sexism. People like you that vote for female candidates solely because of their gender is sexism.
Click to expand...

I would never vote for someone because of their gender.

You can deny the sexism in the OP all you want, I don't mind. Just saying that things like this are why the Right has a problem with women.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
how about Benazir Bhutto of Pakistan.......
Click to expand...
Your as bad at history as you are biology.

Margaret Thatcher would have been a better answer though War was never officially declared in the Falklands Conflict and Argentina did invade the Islands and the Brits had occupied the Islands long before Thatcher was Prime minister would make that a spurious claim but not as spurious as Bhutto for the reason that the Pakistan military, during both of Bhutto’s terms (and to this day) operates independently of the Pakistan civilian government.

Be that as it may it’s nice to see the obvious point sailed over your head...again.
 
Dark Soul said:
Because like liberal men, are emotional creatures.
Click to expand...
Really...and the chief characteristic of conservative men, a deep seated fear, anger and resentment towards anything not in agreement with their personal paradigm, isn’t emotional?

Why it certainly is comforting to the victims of the most dangerous and violent terrorist in our country, right wing conservative men, died for objective, logical and rational reasons. [/sarcasm] LOL
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top