USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
abuse of authority? oppression under color of law? assault? battery? excessive force?
When was he convicted??
abuse of authority? oppression under color of law? assault? battery? excessive force?
When was he convicted??
You have a thick head to match...When a person is in a fully prone and submissive position, there isn't ANYTHING a suspect can SAY that would justify repeated clubbing to the back and legs of the suspect...NONE
IF there was an unseen problem with this suspect, then the officers partner wouldn't have just stood by and watched...
This type of violence happens too often...police departments need to do a better job of weeding out these thugs with badges...
This is something you really need to put to a litmus test.
Go do something stupid, wait for the Police to show up, lay down on the ground, and when they tell you to put your hands behind your back, refuse to do so.
Tell us how it turns out.
he hasn't been and may never be, but i'm not a dyslexic moronic sheeple either. I can see intelligently and make decisions based on those visuals.
then why isn't it working? we still have bad cops in chicago, nyc, and detroit.
as a follow up to this issue, the cop (with his lawyer standing beside him and his superior officer behind him) has said he stands by his actions. no reason for those actions as in any words or actions by the person he beat, but he stands by them. This cop won't see the inside of a courtroom is my guess.
So you want to convict people, on the "VISUALS"!!
video is very telling, especially when circumstances of the incident show that whatever verbal phrases were uttered were irrelevant.
you do know that people have the right to resist an unlawful arrest, right?Well, I finally broke down and watched the video for the first time this evening, and I don't think the video is conclusive at all. From what I see, it looks like the guy resisted arrest, and the officer took him down, then he tried to get up, and the officer struck him, he tried to get up again, and was struck again.
and this I can agree with, I'd like to see the whole unedited video.It also appears the video has been edited, so we don't know what was cut out... and the total time the officer is in contact with the perp is less than 10 seconds. Like I said before, I don't know what happened, I am just going by what I saw on the video. This is precisely why a JURY should hear the evidence, ALL the evidence, in a proper trial, in a court of law! Interpretations of what WE see on a video, is not enough to "convict" the cop, and it shouldn't be!
Suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuure!!
you think it's against the law to tell a cop to kiss my ass?
That would depend on the rest of the conversation.
video is very telling, especially when circumstances of the incident show that whatever verbal phrases were uttered were irrelevant.
I don't see how, can you elaborate?
yet again, we have the right to resist an unlawful arrest. If the arrest is unlawful, I can resist and if that means using lethal force, I have the right to do so. so would this guy.I'm sorry, but I have already said, the video IS NOT VERY TELLING, so we have a difference of opinion on that! It appears the guy RESISTED ARREST! It appears, when he was taken to the ground, he ATTEMPTED to get up! Further RESISTING ARREST!
Sure!!
What would be the rest of the conversation be, in the one where you told a cop to kiss your ass??
I'm glad I was able to help.
if the cop was smart and knew the law, he'd get pissed and walk away. If he was arrogant enough to assume that I need to bow down before him, he'd probably try to arrest me for disorderly conduct or some other bogus charge, in which case it's going to get real fucking ugly real fucking fast, most likely ending in the death of one or both of us.
That was a nice set of Cliff notes; but it didn't do much to clarify what the rest of the conversation was like.
because it would be irrelevant. the cop would either realize he's going to work according to the law or outside of it, the rest is just semantics.
Untrue