THREADBAN POLL 2019

[Legion]

2. PMs are Private Messages, they will remain Private... This will be strictly adhered to by all involved on this board. We cannot access anybody's PMs and we don't plan on acquiring the ability to do so. The only reason we would access another's PMs would be if we were required to by law, or if they are reported by the recipient using the reporting function which will place the PM in an area readable by the Admin Team. Reputation comments are not PMs and should be treated as any publicly accessible information.

Hmmm. I wonder.

Really. Like the PM I just got from Lesion wanting to know the "juicy details" about Toxic's many, many lies. As if anyone would be so stupid to discuss shit with JPP's biggest snitch.

Think this post qualifies?

 

[USFREEDOM911]

This is why you're such a bonehead. Sheri lied about 911. Go back and reread the thread until it all sinks into your thick skull.

Link??

 

[christiefan915]

Telling someone to PM you isn't the same as revealing what was said in a PM, is it?

Shall I remind you of the times you posted to Toxic "PM me for the details" when you were trying to spread lies about me?

 

[Legion]

Go ahead and beg. I'll like it.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Telling someone to PM you isn't the same as revealing what was said in a PM, is it?

NOPE, not according to the rules and it does appear that Owl has either violated the rules or she lied.

 

[christiefan915]

I don't recall them being "pretty accurate."

I definitely can. Too bad I'm so principled that I won't post the evidence here. Lucky for you...

 

[Legion]

Shall I remind you of the times you posted to Toxic "PM me for the details"?

Go ahead. Did I ever reveal the contents of any PMs on the forum?

 

[USFREEDOM911]

I hate to break it to you but you're not her judge.

And does your hypocrisy meter tell you that you're not the judge of anyone, either.

 

[Legion]

I definitely can. Too bad I'm so principled that I won't post the evidence here. Lucky for you...

You can't post what doesn't exist.

 

[Legion]

And does your hypocrisy meter tell you that you're not the judge of anyone, either.

Of course not.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

He mentioned Tarzan so I know for sure I didn't read any discussion between Darla and Tarzan.

A story for every occasion, HUH.

 

[Legion]

NOPE, not according to the rules and it does appear that Owl has either violated the rules or she lied.

Remind me; what is the penalty generally given a malefactor who reveals the contents of a PM on the forum?

 

[christiefan915]

Yes. I don't see anyone named "Sheri" "lying about 9/11" in it.

552.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Hmmm. I wonder.



Think this post qualifies?

OH ABSO-FUCKING-LUTELY, if such an PM was sent; either that or she lied.

I wonder which one she'll try to defend herself with??

 

[christiefan915]

Remind me; what is the penalty generally given a malefactor who reveals the contents of a PM on the forum?

I would say there could be a ban if there was an actual PM for mods to see..

 

[Legion]

552.

Say something about Rana writing a concern post to Sheri? Sheri claimed she had a brother-in-law who died in 911 but his name was never entered into the records or the news because it was too upsetting for the family. She also claimed she had a law practice but didn't know the difference between slander and libel. The way you make fun of Jarod, you would have had a field day with Sheri.

 

[christiefan915]

A story for every occasion, HUH.

No proof. I get it. Who knows, maybe Darla or Tarzan will check in and corroborate your... story.

 

[Legion]

I would say there could be a ban if there was an actual PM for mods to see..

If you beg me, maybe I won't show them one.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Shall I remind you of the times you posted to Toxic "PM me for the details" when you were trying to spread lies about me?

Asking for a PM is not against the rules; but revealing the contents of a PM is.

Or are you unable to understand that??

2. PMs are Private Messages, they will remain Private... This will be strictly adhered to by all involved on this board. We cannot access anybody's PMs and we don't plan on acquiring the ability to do so. The only reason we would access another's PMs would be if we were required to by law, or if they are reported by the recipient using the reporting function which will place the PM in an area readable by the Admin Team. Reputation comments are not PMs and should be treated as any publicly accessible information.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

I definitely can. Too bad I'm so principled that I won't post the evidence here. Lucky for you...

So, no proof just an assertion.