Geeko Sportivo
Verified User
No, Trump didn't need to swear on a bible to tell his lie, when he can just stand out there in the halls and lie away!But he didn't need to
You're not very smart!
No, Trump didn't need to swear on a bible to tell his lie, when he can just stand out there in the halls and lie away!But he didn't need to
idiot.....when the prosecution fails to present a case against you, you don't testify.........he can tell his story at his campaign rallys from now till November........Nobody really believed he would testify, even though he said he would.
Nobody really believes his word is any good, not even the Trumppers.
Trump chickened out of testifying at his trial. He had the perfect opportunity to tell his story, guess he knew it would not help.
you don't mind lying at all......sorry, Cuntselor......a real lawyer would never have posted the OP.......The dude does not mind lying at all, and his disciples love it.
because no defendant takes the stand when the prosecutor fucks up the prosecution.......and even demmycrat legal experts agree that is what happened here.......Every single time the court takes a break, Trump runs outside to holler and tell the TV cameras his side of the story.
Why live in fear of telling his side of the story from the witness stand?
He didn't need to... He said he would but it wasn't necessary... This is not difficult to understand...
Every single time the court takes a break, Trump runs outside to holler and tell the TV cameras his side of the story.
Why live in fear of telling his side of the story from the witness stand?
Nobody really believed he would testify, even though he said he would.
Nobody really believes his word is any good, not even the Trumppers.
Trump chickened out of testifying at his trial. He had the perfect opportunity to tell his story, guess he knew it would not help.
DId you believe him?He didn't lie...he wasn't needed...
He didn't lie...he wasn't needed...
I wish the forum had a video feature, TOP, so that I could see if you said that with a straight face.He didn't need to testify... There was no crime...
Absolutely100% correct.... And a very good morning to you, Nifty...I wish the forum had a video feature, TOP, so that I could see if you said that with a straight face.
I have faith in you.
I bet that you could have pulled it off!
You are more tolerant of Niffies behaviour problems than I am.Absolutely100% correct.... And a very good morning to you, Nifty...
We have the love for puppies thing in common...and an appreciation for good Italian food...You are more tolerant of Niffies behaviour problems than I am.
U R A PEACH!We have the love for puppies thing in common...and an appreciation for good Italian food...
Plus, I'm pretty patient and tolerant of most behavior "problems"...even when they're a bit colorful...
Teaching for so many years I came to realize that when people feel valued and respected they are much more comfortable expressing thoughts and ideas without worrying about being judged unfairly...
That's nice of you to say...thanks...U R A PEACH!
Wow, Polisquawker is back!Hello Jarod,
He lies, even to himself.
Wow, Polisquawker is back!
No, he would have only ruined his case. He can lie to you and the public but not in court.But he didn't need to