Trump is not a racist

Are you saying believing all members of one race are superior to all members of another race makes one a racist? Or are you saying thinking one race is generally superior to another is racist? Please define exactly what a racist is. You cannot possibly argue Trump is not a bigot (Mexican Judge). The question is is Trump a racist. First we must define exactly what your definition of a racist is.
Lol, this is why lefties keep trying to make Muslims, immigrants, illegal immigrants, and Mexicans into races. They label political opponents as racists, but they don't even know what racism is.

A racist is somebody who believes his race is superior to another.
 
Lol, this is why lefties keep trying to make Muslims, immigrants, illegal immigrants, and Mexicans into races. They label political opponents as racists, but they don't even know what racism is.

A racist is somebody who believes his race is superior to another.

What is your belief on that question, racist. Do you believe your race is superior to any other race?
Do you believe your ethnicity is superior to any other ethnicity?
Very easy questions.
 
Members banned from this thread: Cypress, The Wokest, Jarod, Threedee, Mott the Hoople, cawacko, blackascoal, midcan5, evince, christiefan915, ZappasGuitar, signalmankenneth, Phantasmal, Rune, brazenhussy, Althea, Thing1, moon, iolo, Mr.Badguy, Leonthecat, Cadillac Man, Buckly J. Ewer, Bill, domer76, Mr. Shaman, The Sage of Main Street, Billy Batts, sear, Yaya, archives, Nomad, Sailor, Micawber, TTQ64, Hesher, zymurgy, crowonapost, Amadeus, Tomas Fabregas, Owl'd You're Up!, mak2, floridafan, CharacterAssassin, ocean515, Zippity Doo Da, Mason, ThatOwlWoman, TOP, Tranquillus in Exile, Craig234, MAGAt, katzgar, DonaldvoTrumpovich, Jade Dragon, Nordberg, Flash, Bourbon, Shallon Peterson, Gotcha68, Kobie, Centerleftfl, kudzu, Rob Larrikin, The Derp, PoliTalker, rjhenn, guno, Oracle Of JPP 714, Rat Robbersson, Jack and LV426
 
Members banned from this thread: Cypress, The Wokest, Jarod, Threedee, Mott the Hoople, cawacko, blackascoal, midcan5, evince, christiefan915, ZappasGuitar, signalmankenneth, Phantasmal, Rune, brazenhussy, Althea, Thing1, moon, iolo, Mr.Badguy, Leonthecat, Cadillac Man, Buckly J. Ewer, Bill, domer76, Mr. Shaman, The Sage of Main Street, Billy Batts, sear, Yaya, archives, Nomad, Sailor, Micawber, TTQ64, Hesher, zymurgy, crowonapost, Amadeus, Tomas Fabregas, Owl'd You're Up!, mak2, floridafan, CharacterAssassin, ocean515, Zippity Doo Da, Mason, ThatOwlWoman, TOP, Tranquillus in Exile, Craig234, MAGAt, katzgar, DonaldvoTrumpovich, Jade Dragon, Nordberg, Flash, Bourbon, Shallon Peterson, Gotcha68, Kobie, Centerleftfl, kudzu, Rob Larrikin, The Derp, PoliTalker, rjhenn, guno, Oracle Of JPP 714, Rat Robbersson, Jack and LV426

That's an old list. In the current roster, I am listed right after my good friend, Tranquillus in Exile.
 
Are you saying believing all members of one race are superior to all members of another race makes one a racist? Or are you saying thinking one race is generally superior to another is racist? Please define exactly what a racist is.

Lefties have been unable to produce actual evidence in this thread, but they are doing the next best thing that they have to offer. Derail, redefine, dodge, divert, invert, or otherwise evade. In your case, you are looking to redefine the established meaning of racist that I have provided. Again, a racist believes his race is superior to another. To address your question, a racist can believe that any race is superior to another.

You cannot possibly argue Trump is not a bigot (Mexican Judge).

That topic needs a separate thread, this one is specifically about racism. Bigotry is one of many forms of racism, but it is not the meaning of racism.


The question is is Trump a racist.

Now we are talking


First we must define exactly what your definition of a racist is.

The meaning of racism is well established, and it must be about race. This is why lefties always have to go back decades to even find anything to debate.
 
Lefties have been unable to produce actual evidence in this thread, but they are doing the next best thing that they have to offer. Derail, redefine, dodge, divert, invert, or otherwise evade. In your case, you are looking to redefine the established meaning of racist that I have provided. Again, a racist believes his race is superior to another. To address your question, a racist can believe that any race is superior to another.



That topic needs a separate thread, this one is specifically about racism. Bigotry is one of many forms of racism, but it is not the meaning of racism.




Now we are talking




The meaning of racism is well established, and it must be about race. This is why lefties always have to go back decades to even find anything to debate.

Can’t fix your stupid.
 
Hello Evmetro,

I beg to differ.

Evidence has been presented.

Whether or not you recognize it is one thing.

It has been presented.

Trump is a racist.

And the evidence is piling up.

Here's some recent evidence:

Puerto Rico.
 
Hello Evmetro,

I beg to differ.

Evidence has been presented.

Whether or not you recognize it is one thing.

It has been presented.

Trump is a racist.

And the evidence is piling up.

Here's some recent evidence:

Puerto Rico.

Copy and paste this evidence and explain how it is different than just a plausible path.
 
Copy and paste this evidence and explain how it is different than just a plausible path.

Why. You just say NO. Somehow you think you are the arbiter of what is racist and what is not. Many, many examples and you hand wave them away. Who has a lifetime of racial incidents, for no reason? Apparently Trump is the only one.
 
Hello Evmetro,

Copy and paste this evidence and explain how it is different than just a plausible path.

We are going in a circle.

What is going on is plenty of us have presented plenty of evidence.

You have rejected it, saying it is not evidence because it is not proof.

But that doesn't mean it is not evidence.

Proof is not a requirement for something to be evidence.
 
Hello Evmetro,



We are going in a circle.

What is going on is plenty of us have presented plenty of evidence.

You have rejected it, saying it is not evidence because it is not proof.

But that doesn't mean it is not evidence.

Proof is not a requirement for something to be evidence.

Enough has been presented to meet any "reasonable person" burden.
 
There's a reason why he does all his tough talk on Twitter like a little Bitch.

Same MO every time. Posts utter bullshit and then "predicts" that he will be insulted. Then, replies with an "I told you so".

No shit. Fucktards deserve ridicule.
 
Back
Top