Trump is not a racist

christiefan915 said:
Gawd, you're dumb. PAGE ONE.

Accordingly, without adjudication of the merit and without any admission as to the existence or absence of liability, and in
order to resolve this matter without further protracted litigation, the parties hereto are prepared to resolve this case by the
entry of a Consent Decree.

https://www.clearinghouse.net/chDocs/public/FH-NY-0024-0034.pdf
Click to expand...

Yep, the both agreed to agree and the case was dismissed.
NO COURT ORDER.

:evilnod:
 
christiefan915 said:
Seriously, you wrote the above and ignored this? Why on god's green earth would the feds bring a suit against the trumps if there was no evidence of discrimination?
Click to expand...

because the expect people to pussy out and pay money to make them go away......just like when Jarot and his ilk file their bogus law suits.....
 
PostmodernProphet said:
i
uh, chrispy........the statute already prevented them from doing that......as I said, the settlement required nothing new.....
Click to expand...

lol

^As I said, his head is up his ass. Trump and Daddy Trump violated the very statute this idiot refers to.

The settlement required something very new to the Trumps. That they adhere to the law.
 
domer76 said:
Zowie.

Never have I seen such a massively stupid person with zero knowledge of the English language. Is it your second language? You don't have a first language, do you, illiterate cretin?
Click to expand...

I see you're still obsessed with me.
I'm flattered; but just a little concerned.

:evilnod:
 
evince said:
any human that will USE racism for their own gain IS A RACIST
Click to expand...

Technically it makes him an opportunist. Keep in mind that I'm not defending Trump. I just don't think he's evolved mentally enough to be racist. Racism is a very base level of human reasoning, and Trump doesn't meet even that threshold. He operates on the level of a child, and most children aren't racist.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
i
uh, chrispy........the statute already prevented them from doing that......as I said, the settlement required nothing new.....
Click to expand...

.....uh, Pmp..... we know that about the statute..... the problem is the trumps did what the statute said they should not do..... otherwise they wouldn't have been put under a Consent Decree.....
 
christiefan915 said:
.....uh, Pmp..... we know that about the statute..... the problem is the trumps did what the statute said they should not do..... otherwise they wouldn't have been put under a Consent Decree.....
Click to expand...

actually the consent agreement acknowledges there is no finding that they violated the statute......sort of fucks with your logic, doesn't it.......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
actually the consent agreement acknowledges there is no finding that they violated the statute......sort of fucks with your logic, doesn't it.......
Click to expand...

No, stupid fuck. That's standard for consent decrees. That they had to jump through all those hoops as outlined in the decree is proof they were ignoring those requirements all along.

Ignorant Trump twatwaddle
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top