Is that so? "He's mildly educated lol:" Really.
Gates insinuates that taking in refugees creates more migratory pressures. That's patently wrong. If that were the case, we'd have ten of millions at Europe's borders. Blight, in conjunction with endless violence, creates migratory pressures.
Oh and, there's the eternal talk, never even remotely substantiated, about the "cultural values" Those People don't share. Again, is that so? What, really, do you know about them? And why are they so dangerous?
Gates is a dummy. He doesn't know whereof he speaks - it just dawned on my why you are so sympathetic to him.
Here's a bit of an education for your xenophobic bubblehead:
- What Gates suggests is, in effect, with respect to Italy, to let refugees drown in the Mediterranean. That's those "cultural values" at work, about which you so confidently pontificate without the first clue whereof you speak.
- If we look a little to the East, say, refugee camps in and around Syria, created by the other set of our "cultural values" resulting in the destruction of Iraq and Syria, that would be places of unspeakable blight and destitution. These are, as demonstrated earlier in and around Afghanistan - also a result of those darned "cultural values" - prime recruiting grounds for jihadists. We also know that those trained abroad, with no effective government oversight and actual fighting experience, are far more dangerous than those who are in our midst, and have ever to be cautious not to be detected. So yeah, xenophobic bubblehead, taking in refugees actually reduces the dangers of jihadist attacks, even though your handlers tell you to hyperventilate about "they're invading our shores, they're coming after us!"
Quite naturally, you do as obliged "lol".