01-16-2016,*09:47 AM
#25 | Top
evince
Truthmatters
Join Date
Jul 2006
Posts
68,247
Thanks
7,846
Thanked 8,073 Times in 6,389 Posts
Groans
0
Groaned 4,978 Times in 4,610 Posts
I don't fear you grind
I would handle it fine
but the other posters here should be notified about how the mods and owner would use their personal info to threaten people who post here
the third one to the owner of the site
informing him that veiled threats to a women would not be accepted by me
the fuck are you talking about
as interesting as this all is..it's of no meaning as Trump has gone Full Boogeyman on Russia
chiding them on their support of Assad, and Iran..mentioning Ukraine without mentioning NATO expansion
He's the next-in-line Cold Warrior *yankee doodle*
You're not buying that theater, are you?
The only theater here is the number of sharks you'll jump in order to cling to your ridiculous Russian theory lol.
You lemmings have brought new amusement to JPP.
Um: he builds stuff and borrows money as cheaply as possible?
Greg
as interesting as this all is..it's of no meaning as Trump has gone Full Boogeyman on Russia
chiding them on their support of Assad, and Iran..mentioning Ukraine without mentioning NATO expansion
He's the next-in-line Cold Warrior *yankee doodle*
that makes sense..thanks..I mean what else can he say in a speech?Meh, I think Trump is just saying things that [he at least, thinks] need to be said. And in typical Trump fashion, he doesn't much care about the consequences. If one is seeking a reset [I hate that word] with Russia the prudent thing would be to steer away from contentious issues when speaking to the Poles.
Politicians are infamous for spouting platitudinous mumbo-jumbo in such speeches. Obama, for example, might go on about 'the arc of history favoring the good guys' or whatever. It sounds all high-minded but at the end of the day it doesn't budge the needle.
Trump was talking about practical things. Like encouraging them to be less dependent on The Bear for their energy needs. Or reassuring NATO countries we weren't abandoning them.
None of this would be particularly pleasing to Putin, and it could even jeopardize their talks. But I get the sense Trump just doesn't think that way.
Putin's press will quickly let us know what the PeeOTUS agreed to. The question is whether or not the buffoon will have the courage to deny it before he gets home to his safe place.that makes sense..thanks..I mean what else can he say in a speech?
anythingh has to be better then Obama's feckless hands off /or sanctions overkill on Egypt -giving Russia
a real presence there and along w/Syria and the Iran geopolitical alliance
Poland has that "3 seas initiative" (?) to bypass Russian gas. there is Nord Stream 2 also
I hate "reset too" as Tillerson pointed out there is no reset, there is only going forward from where we are now in Russian relations.
How would you like to be a fly on the wall on the Putin meeting tomorrow?
that makes sense..thanks..I mean what else can he say in a speech?
anythingh has to be better then Obama's feckless hands off /or sanctions overkill on Egypt -giving Russia
a real presence there and along w/Syria and the Iran geopolitical alliance
Poland has that "3 seas initiative" (?) to bypass Russian gas. there is Nord Stream 2 also
I hate "reset too" as Tillerson pointed out there is no reset, there is only going forward from where we are now in Russian relations.
How would you like to be a fly on the wall on the Putin meeting tomorrow?
yes i get that. what I'm showing is it's a house of cards..what the INTERCEPT article is showing is the technical analysis is far from ironclad, in fact there are many alternative scenarios..
where do you suggest I go to for sourcing? The entire US govt ( IC leadership-Congress/US press ( fake and non-fake) are under the assumption our IC leadership is never wrong ( see Iraq) and is above politicization.
so my sources are limited, by they make good points . They show a perspective from the inside of how classified assessments are assembled, and they show how little facts are used in the non-Classified assessment.
I look at any source if the contents are credible..these are.
as interesting as this all is..it's of no meaning as Trump has gone Full Boogeyman on Russia
chiding them on their support of Assad, and Iran..mentioning Ukraine without mentioning NATO expansion
Tthat's a funny, Greg. No other banks will lend to him.
Meh, I think Trump is just saying things that [he at least, thinks] need to be said. And in typical Trump fashion, he doesn't much care about the consequences. If one is seeking a reset [I hate that word] with Russia the prudent thing would be to steer away from contentious issues when speaking to the Poles.
Politicians are infamous for spouting platitudinous mumbo-jumbo in such speeches. Obama, for example, might go on about 'the arc of history favoring the good guys' or whatever. It sounds all high-minded but at the end of the day it doesn't budge the needle.
Trump was talking about practical things. Like encouraging them to be less dependent on The Bear for their energy needs. Or reassuring NATO countries we weren't abandoning them.
None of this would be particularly pleasing to Putin, and it could even jeopardize their talks. But I get the sense Trump just doesn't think that way.
you are simply saying I am not writing my ideas.you are down to calling me a nutter,
and using my editorializing as some reason I am not able to source my ideas.
I have no interest in proving to you those are my own ideas.
Because you don't dispute them, you are simply plcking them out to be argumentative without purpose
except to bolster your made up name calling charaterizations.
your posts are devolving to "nya nya weiner weiner" type insults. good for you.