Owl'd You're Up!
Verified User
In a world in which use of FFs is either rigorously proscribed, or even becomes simply impossible, at least in any real quantities, it may be the case that there are many fewer perks and toys for the rich. Which is to say, being rich may no longer be so attractive, in many respects. And at the same time, when the severe harm resulting from profligate use of FFs finally (...finally!!!) becomes crystal-clear to all, it is reasonable to expect that severe social censure, at least, will be earned by anyone who persists in such behavior.
This is part--but only part--of the argument that has lately become popular, to the effect that when we reach environmental sanity and a sustainable society, we will ipso facto have achieved a much higher level of equality.
With all due respect, that, I hold, is entirely delusional. Rather, there will be even more and bigger distinctions, as some currently middle-class items will become far more expensive, no longer within the reach of the middle class, but still accessible by the rich. That has not necessarily to do with FF use, which will at one time be patently over, but with electricity from a wide variety of sources becoming the main "fuel" we use, and, say, transportation being the crucial element no longer affordable by many. Travel over more than short distances may well be a luxury item by then. Of course, I cannot prove things either way, and it may even be that more egalitarian societies might become even more egalitarian, while for the U.S. of Plutocracy things look considerably worse. Inequality is caused by political decisions; they are not a fate. But, all that is just speculation, admittedly.