trump: oblivious moron or psychotically narcissistic oblivious moron?

https://jonathanturley.org/2017/07/...ally-treason-or-the-smoking-gun-of-collusion/

Was the Meeting Between Donald Trump Jr. and The Russian Lawyer Really “Treason” or The “Smoking Gun” of Collusion?

Richard Painter, an ethics lawyer under former President George W. Bush, has declared that the meeting of Donald Trump Jr., with a Russian lawyer who claimed to have compromising information on Hillary Clinton during the campaign, “borders on treason.” Others have said that the disclosure could be the long sought after “smoking gun” on collusion and evidence of criminal conduct. I am afraid that I have to continue my record as something of a “buzz kill” on these stories. There is not a clear criminal act in such a meeting based on the information that we have. Moreover, it is not necessarily unprecedented.


There is no crime in listening to people who say that they have incriminating information on a political opponent, even a foreigner. Article III defines treason as “levying War against [the United States], or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.” To say that this type of meeting even borders on treason is quite a departure from the language and cases governing that crime.



Hyperventilating fools at the NY Slimes schnucker other fools.
 
yowsa said:
https://jonathanturley.org/2017/07/...ally-treason-or-the-smoking-gun-of-collusion/

Was the Meeting Between Donald Trump Jr. and The Russian Lawyer Really “Treason” or The “Smoking Gun” of Collusion?

Richard Painter, an ethics lawyer under former President George W. Bush, has declared that the meeting of Donald Trump Jr., with a Russian lawyer who claimed to have compromising information on Hillary Clinton during the campaign, “borders on treason.” Others have said that the disclosure could be the long sought after “smoking gun” on collusion and evidence of criminal conduct. I am afraid that I have to continue my record as something of a “buzz kill” on these stories. There is not a clear criminal act in such a meeting based on the information that we have. Moreover, it is not necessarily unprecedented.


There is no crime in listening to people who say that they have incriminating information on a political opponent, even a foreigner. Article III defines treason as “levying War against [the United States], or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.” To say that this type of meeting even borders on treason is quite a departure from the language and cases governing that crime.



Hyperventilating fools at the NY Slimes schnucker other fools.
Click to expand...

Moreover, Jarod Trump testified that he only knew the person had something 'that could help his fathers campaign'. When asked about that, the person turned out to not have anything at all [or maybe it wasn't anything coherent?] but she went onto talk about the Russian adoption issue.

Over on Twitter, the snowflakes are convinced this is it, finally lol. They're a desperate bunch.
 
Cosmos said:
Sounds like we're talking about different people. In that case, never mind.
Click to expand...

I am talking about the mod that read the Riot Act to the Manky Mongoose. He often changes his name so us old timers refer to him by his original name.

Sent from my iPhone 25S with cherries on top
 
Milagro said:
I am talking about the mod that read the Riot Act to the Manky Mongoose. He often changes his name so us old timers refer to him by his original name.

Sent from my iPhone 25S with cherries on top
Click to expand...

yeah. different mod. Anyway, I saw what you're talking about. Charitable, imo. Should have banned him outright.
 
Darth Omar said:
Moreover, Jarod Trump testified that he only knew the person had something 'that could help his fathers campaign'. When asked about that, the person turned out to not have anything at all [or maybe it wasn't anything coherent?] but she went onto talk about the Russian adoption issue.

Over on Twitter, the snowflakes are convinced this is it, finally lol. They're a desperate bunch.
Click to expand...

I can't be true lol the story contradicts the first one lol but lol lol lol lol.
Hey pinhead lol have you considered lol using ten or twenty exclamation marks lol to insist your asserted inanity is truth lol?
 
Cosmos said:
I hate to disappoint you, Chickenshit. But nobody cares what you dirty dumb leftist animals do. You're somebody else's problem now.
Click to expand...

So why, one must ask, are you here, and not there?
If you were a fisherman, I would call you 'The Incompleat Angler'.
[wink, wink, nudge, nudge.]
 
X.O.2 said:
I can't be true lol the story contradicts the first one lol but lol lol lol lol.
Hey pinhead lol have you considered lol using ten or twenty exclamation marks lol to insist your asserted inanity is truth lol?
Click to expand...

Well, do you think you have something, finally lol?
 
RickyTavy said:
BV peddled no information about anybody. DeviantTwitch is feeling so bad over getting caught being a dishonest snitch, he even comes over here to lie about his cowardly reliance on a biased mommy mod to protect him from snowllake bullies. Nobody believes him at his safe place, either.
Click to expand...

BV was banned by Mods United; the whole team gets a say on permanent bannings. I don't know the quorum number. Gring is at this venue; not the Mothership.

Greg
 
Cosmos said:
yeah. different mod. Anyway, I saw what you're talking about. Charitable, imo. Should have banned him outright.
Click to expand...
It's stupid. A lot of us have known who Narcissio is for quite a while. We've even read some of his published bullshit. The only problems it caused were in his fearful little mind.
 
Kaykan said:
So why, one must ask, are you here, and not there?
If you were a fisherman, I would call you 'The Incompleat Angler'.
[wink, wink, nudge, nudge.]
Click to expand...

I'm here to educate and inform the good people on this forum about the raft of vicious dirty animals that recently invaded their space.
 
RickyTavy said:
Same reason the sissy mod kept banning liberals but never did anything to your fellow trump fluffers. In this case, it was done when BV would not agree to a plea deal that would have let him off in exchange for letting the mod save face. It is the reason we are here and why a lonely Twitch like you follows us around. Well, that and you are not getting enough of the abuse you get off on at your safe place
Click to expand...
LIAR!!!! I was booted TWICE totally unfairly of course; they were WRONG WRONG WRONG....though I did break the rules I suppose...

lmao

Greg
 
X.O.2 said:
It's stupid. A lot of us have known who Narcissio is for quite a while. We've even read some of his published bullshit. The only problems it caused were in his fearful little mind.
Click to expand...

I see. So in your arrogant tiny mind that makes you exempt from the rules. Is that it?
 
RickyTavy said:
If you would like to know, DeviantTwitch, here's what actually happened:

Following the banning of several liberals, while filth like you repeatedly got away with sexually sliming other posters' children, and culminating in the unfair banning of BV, I organized a petition asking the mods generally to address our concerns regarding the mod Flacaltenn's actions. We got no response. As a result, several of us decided to look for a better place. There was no boycott or even any call for one. Some of us post at your safe place with regularity, some don't. In my case it is a combination of principle and the fact that when I look in over there it dominated by boring feebs like SPRAYIT and ChlamydiaBear, and Deplorables grooming each other from hide-from bunkers. I don't go there much now, mostly because it is boring.

You can share this with the other sucker groupies. Since you are a Deplorable, you can do this without getting in trouble for bringing up stuff from other places.
Click to expand...

Pitiful. Fucking bloody PITIFUL. lmao

Greg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top