trump: oblivious moron or psychotically narcissistic oblivious moron?
- Thread starter RickyTavy
- Start date
Dropbear1
Verified User
lmao. Pixels on a screen get to ya that much, hey?? fuck you're a pathetic cunt!! When you're through poling your poledancer your Pissgums Crew miss your poling!! Share the slime, fucktard!!
Greg
blackvegetable
Verified User
Why are you here, Pork Roast with Ears?
blackvegetable
Verified User
Right now I'm basting the love of your life's face with it.........
Moondoggie
Verified User
Fish taco with an internet connection.
Moondoggie
Verified User
Fran Lebowitz Every time I see the sentence “Paul Ryan is the conscience of the Republican Party,” I think: What is that? Is that like being the quarterback of the New York City Ballet?
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/15/fashion/bill-maher-fran-lebowitz-table-for-three-trump.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=mini-moth®ion=top-stories-below&WT.nav=top-stories-below&_r=0
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/15/fashion/bill-maher-fran-lebowitz-table-for-three-trump.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=mini-moth®ion=top-stories-below&WT.nav=top-stories-below&_r=0
Dropbear1
Verified User
DUMB!! lmao. That's it; like "that's not what your girfriend said" sorta childish??
Greg
Dropbear1
Verified User
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...w-report-no-way-valid-representation-reality/
SHFTPLan reports:
"According to the report, which has been peer reviewed by administrators, scientists and researchers from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (M.I.T.), and several of America’s leading universities, the data is completely bunk:
"In this research report, the most important surface data adjustment issues are identified and past changes in the previously reported historical data are quantified. It was found that each new version of GAST has nearly always exhibited a steeper warming linear trend over its entire history. And, it was nearly always accomplished by systematically removing the previously existing cyclical temperature pattern. This was true for all three entities providing GAST data measurement, NOAA, NASA and Hadley CRU."
When once you set out to cook the books ..........
SHFTPLan reports:
"According to the report, which has been peer reviewed by administrators, scientists and researchers from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (M.I.T.), and several of America’s leading universities, the data is completely bunk:
"In this research report, the most important surface data adjustment issues are identified and past changes in the previously reported historical data are quantified. It was found that each new version of GAST has nearly always exhibited a steeper warming linear trend over its entire history. And, it was nearly always accomplished by systematically removing the previously existing cyclical temperature pattern. This was true for all three entities providing GAST data measurement, NOAA, NASA and Hadley CRU."
When once you set out to cook the books ..........
Dropbear1
Verified User
Really?
You'd have thought they'd have done a better job. Looks like alarmism has hit the deniers.
Last edited:
Conservatives are again denying the very existence of global warming
https://www.theguardian.com/
The claim is based on what can charitably be described as a white paper, written by fossil fuel-funded contrarians Joseph D’Aleo and Craig Idso along with James Wallace III. Two months ago, D’Aleo and Wallace published another error-riddled white paper on the same website with fellow contrarian John Christy; both papers aimed to undermine the EPA’s Endangerment Finding.
[...]
The paper itself has little scientific content. Using charts taken from climate denier blogs, the authors claim that every temperature record adjustment since the 1980s has been in the warming direction, which is simply false. As Zeke Hausfather pointed out, referencing work by Nick Stokes, roughly half of the adjustments have resulted in cooling and half in warming. Moreover, the net adjustment to the raw data actually reduces the long-term global warming trend:
https://www.theguardian.com/
The claim is based on what can charitably be described as a white paper, written by fossil fuel-funded contrarians Joseph D’Aleo and Craig Idso along with James Wallace III. Two months ago, D’Aleo and Wallace published another error-riddled white paper on the same website with fellow contrarian John Christy; both papers aimed to undermine the EPA’s Endangerment Finding.
[...]
The paper itself has little scientific content. Using charts taken from climate denier blogs, the authors claim that every temperature record adjustment since the 1980s has been in the warming direction, which is simply false. As Zeke Hausfather pointed out, referencing work by Nick Stokes, roughly half of the adjustments have resulted in cooling and half in warming. Moreover, the net adjustment to the raw data actually reduces the long-term global warming trend:
Last edited:
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Would you miss him if you were driving and the git was walking across the road in front of you?
Last edited:
Dropbear1
Verified User
cancel2 2022
Canceled
The Guardian has no credibility when it comes to climate matters, none whatsoever. This is especially true of that appalling shyster Dana Nuttertelli.
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wor...uses-pseudo-science-to-libel-dr-john-christy/
Last edited: