PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
He's probably a communist teacher.
how did you know!......I spend my days here teaching the lib'urls, socialists and commynists the error of your ways......
He's probably a communist teacher.
?????......shouldn't YOU be the one finding out who helped write it.......you're the one who made the claim that they were now saying they wouldn't vote for it.....
lol you said precisely what I claimed, because I pasted your words..... "I turn on the news to find Republican Senators who helped write this stupid new healthcare law say they won't vote for it?"
and now you've said it again?.....did any of those four help write it?......it just came out of committee.......which of them were on the committee that wrote it?......
apparently that's the way YOU roll.....
Sorry, poser, but we are well-used to dealing with rightards who deflect with anecdotal evidence.
I provided a Nobel economist as a citation. I provided several graphs showing the history of disparity of wealth and income.
You? You, you simpering feeb? One of your many problems is that you have defined reality in terms of how being a privileged brat worked out for your pampered ass. .
To this point you can take some pride in being the greatest impediment to our alien invasion. You are about a mouthy, self-fellating sumbitch, but your self-evaluation as a superior rightard has convinced some of my buddies that you are right - that you are as smart as rightards get here. Many are willing to move on, hoping to find something more challenging than a snotty bitch who thinks I-know-you-are is repartee.
I imagine the next bit of data with source you post to back up your position will be the first.As opposed to warming alarmists who stupidly think glaciers haven't been receding for millions of years? Dolt.
Correct. The problem is, murdering your reputation (assuming you had one) while surviving the act has you swaddling through life with its decaying corpse around your neck, for all to see.
I imagine the next bit of data with source you post to back up your position will be the first.
View attachment 4311
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs_v3/
No way in the world will I take that bet.Think he'll believe that? It only covers one hundred thousandth of his claim to believe. His faith is bigger than your science by a long shot.
A dollar says you can't come up with a fact he can't deny.
In other forums I frequent bots are always named.There always seems to be 2 guests currently browsing this thread. Are they the bots we keep hearing about?
If wit was shit he'd be constipated.oh my.......your wit overwhelms me.......
Your inference was that I said the four who are suspected of not wanting to vote for it all wrote it.
to see if this twink addresses this
Rhiney will like debating him tho, and it'll be fun to watch.
have you compared your data to the ice core samples?.......120 years is a tiny blip on the 450k year graphs......those show we haven't yet gotten the the highest temperatures of the last cycle....I'm sure that was man-made as well, despite being from 150k years ago......I imagine the next bit of data with source you post to back up your position will be the first.
View attachment 4311
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs_v3/
Present your data on the historical rate of temperature change, you elliptical denseness.have you compared your data to the ice core samples?.......
Present your data on the historical rate of temperature change, you elliptical denseness.
okayPresent your data on the historical rate of temperature change, you elliptical denseness.
I inferred no such thing.....I quoted you saying that specific thing.....twice now......sucks to be an idiot, I'm sure but I expect you're used to it by now.......