BartenderElite
Verified User
POTUS has free speech rights like anyone else in the USA
Where has that been infringed upon?
POTUS has free speech rights like anyone else in the USA
no i get it. I agreeded with you earlier.Private ownership.
It's amazing how you can't seem to grasp that concept.
no i get it. I agreeded with you earlier.
But private ownership of the public square is an anathema to free speech rights.
Social media needs regulations since they have now decided to act as censors
POTUS has free speech rights like anyone else in the USA
no i get it. I agreeded with you earlier.
But private ownership of the public square is an anathema to free speech rights.
Social media needs regulations since they have now decided to act as censors
the right to make an unfettered political remarkWhere has that been infringed upon?
red herring. It;s not a"public utility" it acts as a public platformSo you believe the internet is a public utility, then?
So you'd be all about nationalizing ISP's?
Strange times.
the right to make an unfettered political remark
you do get the idea that political speech is the "most protected" type of speech?
Instead we have a corporation acting to censor by attaching "Falsehoods" corrections-the remedy is to argue/debate nt have a corporation attach their view as "correction" that may suit their agenda
the right to make an unfettered political remark
you do get the idea that political speech is the "most protected" type of speech?
Instead we have a corporation acting to censor by attaching "Falsehoods" corrections-
the remedy is to argue/debate nt have a corporation attach their view as "correction" that may suit their agenda
political lying is also protected -it happens all the time by all politiciansWhen your defense of lying is that it's free speech, you've lost the capacity for anyone to take you at your word.
red herring. It;s not a"public utility" it acts as a public platform
political lying is also protected -it happens all the time by all politicians
red herring. It;s not a"public utility" it acts as a public platform
Lies and conspiracy theories are not "most protected." Many have argued that Trump is already being given preferential treatment by Twitter for not being banned for his unreal (and completely unfounded) attack on Scarborough.
You don't really understand free speech, or censorship. Ya can't yell "fire" in a crowded theater & all that.
political lying is also protected -it happens all the time by all politicians
If?
Fingers Biden woiuld never be banned no matter what he posts, Rumper. You know that as well as I do.
Twitter needs to register as a political action group...so do CNN and MSNBC snd most of the media.
yelling fire in a theater is a threat to public safety. as is inciting a riot. those aer crimes
they remedy for "lies" is to say the truth
I can't understand how you miss something So basic to American democracy
the right to make an unfettered political remark
you do get the idea that political speech is the "most protected" type of speech?
I agree -i've said this like 3 times now -that social media is a private corp.You're saying the same thing I am.
Twitter isn't a public platform, it's a privately-owned corporation.
You are conflating the internet itself with platforms that exist on the internet.
So if your argument is that the public "owns" the internet, then you can't simultaneously argue against the nationalization of ISP's.
I mean you could, but your argument would be cognitive dissonance, which seems to be the basis of most of your beliefs.
perhaps. but again what is the remedy?You don't think Trump's lies & conspiracy theories have negative ramifications for others?