Again, a hardwood floor is NOT made of plywood. He described two different experiences with one customer. And the reality is the evidence does not support your scenario at all. She wasn't getting a plywood floor installed.Because she probably had to tell him which plywood to use. I know you are used to your omniscience, but not everyone has that gift. Us mere mortals have to use language and other methods of communication to convey our thoughts to others.
The reality is that the evidence just as likely fits my scenario as yours but mine doesn't permit a bunch of stodgy old-timers to beat the hobby-horse of the so-called hypocrisy of greenies.
Again, a hardwood floor is NOT made of plywood. He described two different experiences with one customer.
And?Many are laminated now.
LOL. Any port in a storm, right?The subfloor could have been ply.
Again, a hardwood floor is NOT made of plywood. He described two different experiences with one customer. And the reality is the evidence does not support your scenario at all. She wasn't getting a plywood floor installed.
it is glued together plys of wood. duhhh.And?
1. Ad hominem only shows you already know your position is weak.Subfloor. Say it with me now, Damo: subfloor. S-U-B-F-L-O-O-R. Subfloor.
Come on, junior, you can do it: subfloor.
Moron.
Point out the post where I said "preaching". You'll find that it isn't there because I realized that it was not evident that she tried to get others to be green. It is evident that she was proud of her "green" as she contacted tin to get the manufacturer's number for the plywood and made a point of how "green" she was by doing it."and you people are making some serious assumption that is not evident with the post"
Oh, yeah - we sure are. Like saying she's preaching, and saying that the wood will likely be discarded now...that kind of stuff....
In the first post. Tin, IMO, made it clear that she informed them of how she was "green" and that she contacted the plywood manufacturer for that reason."It is evident that she was proud of her "green" as she contacted tin to get the manufacturer's number for the plywood and made a point of how "green" she was by doing it."
Where did she make a point of saying how "green" she was?
Can you give me the verbiage on that?
Point out the post where I said "preaching". You'll find that it isn't there because I realized that it was not evident that she tried to get others to be green. It is evident that she was proud of her "green" as she contacted tin to get the manufacturer's number for the plywood and made a point of how "green" she was by doing it.
True it is only my opinion, but it is based on what is evident in the post.
1. Tin used one story to point out how "green" she thought she was. (plywood story)
2. Tin then stated a second story to point out how she reacted "not so green" when presented with an inconvenience.
In the first post, it is evident to me that the first was a story to point out how green she was, the second paragraph was a second story showing how she didn't act it when it came down to it.Damo - You are correct that there is no indication that the subfloor was being replaced (or installed for the first time in new construction) but there is also no evidence that subfloor was not being installed. We do have evidence of plywood being used on a flooring installation though. What the fuck else do you need to use plywood for on a flooring installation?
And even if the plywood wasn't being used for the floor, how does that change the possibility that the customer's concern with the glue used in the plywood was an indoor air quality concern not a global environmental concern?
In the first post. Tin, IMO, made it clear that she informed them of how she was "green" and that she contacted the plywood manufacturer for that reason.
I don't think it is an assumption. It is how people make points like this.No, he didn't. Bad assumption....