Kamala Trump
Verified User
Damo. Does it call for a draft?
Unfuckingbelievable, Dems try and reintroduce draft!
- Thread starter KingCondanomation
- Start date
Yes, I do not believe that the vast majority of republicans would be as effected as you want to believe.
Many of them already have kids serving there. Of that 1% an inordinate amount come from R families.
I think it would effect those who don't usually vote far more than it would Republicans, at least opinion-wise.
You do understand what 1% of the population means, don't you?
I do. I just don't think you understand how much Rs have supported this action and how often the regular "R" family thinks the military is a great idea and send their kids into it.
Still they are mad that Bush didn't go in strongly enough, but want to "give up"? No.
I think you do not know what you are talking about when you talk about Rs opinions. It wouldn't change the republican party's opinion on the "war" in Iraq.
Again, I suggest that it would have the effect you want because it would effect people who weren't in either party.
Idiot... Charles Wrangle has been calling for a draft since before 2004, look into his justification... it is achually reasonable, and BTW he is anti-war!
Ok, so the answer is, no, you don't understand what one percent of the population means.
FUCK THE POLICE
911 EVERY DAY
Non-sequitor:
Charles Rangel is a Democrat
Charles Rangel wants to reintroduce the draft
Therefore, Democrats want to reintroduce the draft
Good job at feigning surprise and outrage there, Dano. Rangel has submitted this bill over and over since 2004, and the only time it ever actually got out of committee was in 2005 when the Republicans were looking for a way to embarrass the Democrats. Rangel actually voted against it when it came up for vote.
You are being willfully ignorant in pretending you didn't already know this.
FUCK THE POLICE
911 EVERY DAY
Yes. Dano wants to pretend that he doesn't know this so he can stir up some false outrage. He is being willfully ignorant. This isn't just lying, this is pure slander.
No, the answer is yes, but I understand what the opinion of the vast majority of people in the R party on the "war" is and that their reaction would be less than you believe.
Much like they supported continued action in East Asia, even with a draft, for a very long time.
I think you are simply mistaken in your estimation of how it would effect the Rs opinion of the war.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
Which was my point earlier. Dismissed because of timeline. Whatever. He's doing it because he believes that if Americans believe such a reintroduction is inevitable that it would turn the citizens against the war. I agree.
What I disagree with, is Darla's belief that it would be "Rs" who were convinced by it.
He's talking about taking one Dem and making it "Dems." This is something Dano does shamelessly, and often.
I love how he still asserts that "liberal Dems" are responsible for Sarbanes Oxley, and it only passed because a few "moderate Republicans" went along with it (it received only 3 "nay" votes in both houses of Congress).
FUCK THE POLICE
911 EVERY DAY
He did not say that RANGEL wanted to introduce the draft. That would be true. He said that because Rangel is a Democrat and wants to introduce the draft, ALL DEMOCRATS WANT TO INTRODUCE THE DRAFT. He KNOWS this is incorrect. He KNOWS why its a logical fallacy. He is a LYING PIECE OF SHIT.
this is madness!
FUCK THE POLICE
911 EVERY DAY
Did you catch the plural Damo? I'm just wondering. Because "shitheads" cannot be used to refer to Rangel. Rangel is a singular. Rangel is the only Democrat who supports this bill, and even then he's bluffing. Pelosi won't bring it to a vote because she doesn't want to embarrass the Democrats like the Republicans did.
Did you get that? The "liberal" media is refusing to report something, JUST BECAUSE IT HAS NO CHANCE IN HELL OF EVEN GETTING OUT ON THE FLOOR! Why, this country is so unfair to the conservatives who have ruined it. They won't even spend 24/7 screaming "DEMOCRATS WANT TO REINTRODUCE THE DRAFT"! That's re-fucking-diculous! How could anyone think that way?!
It is not, after all, like he tries to pass it off on each new congress.
No. That would be too much for Dano's tiny conservatard head.
Yes, flowing forward from his assertion that he (RangeL) had support for it he then appropriately used a plural to get his idea across. While I don't agree with the idea I can understand the path he took to get there.
Personally, I understand what Rangel is doing and that he has done it before and why. This is why I talk about Rangel, not "Democrats". The attempt to assume agreement in a simple clarification is a misled assumption, and the incapacity to simply understand what he said and point out where he was wrong is sad.
FUCK THE POLICE
911 EVERY DAY
You fucking idiot.
No, that doesn't apply, you squirmy little fuck. He's a lying shithead.
My belief is that most of America would be. It's YOUR belief, that three-quarters of a percentile equals "most republicans".
Which one of us is crazy?
I report, you decide.
