Were Confederate soldiers terrorists?

I wonder if any of the confederate sympathizers on here would agree that there were undoubtedly instances when confederate soldiers, for whatever reason, broke into the homes of civilians in the dead of night and frightened women and children who were awakened from their slumber by their incursion?
 
I wonder if any of the confederate sympathizers on here would agree that there were undoubtedly instances when confederate soldiers, for whatever reason, broke into the homes of civilians in the dead of night and frightened women and children who were awakened from their slumber by their incursion?
Ask the Democrats. Slave ownership is part of their political heritage.
 
I wonder if any of the confederate sympathizers on here would agree that there were undoubtedly instances when confederate soldiers, for whatever reason, broke into the homes of civilians in the dead of night and frightened women and children who were awakened from their slumber by their incursion?

Were there 'undoubtedly' such incidents? Can you cite some examples? Or is this just a reach-around to the well used ass cheeks for something to toss into the thread? I don't know why on earth Confederate soldiers would ever break into Confederate homes, and any time Confederate soldiers were up north, they were fighting Union forces, not razing homes. So I'll go out on a limb and challenge this, I think it is 'highly doubtable' this ever happened, and and you have nothing to support your claim.
 
Robert E. Lee,

General Orders, No. 73


Headquarters, Army of Northern Virginia

Chambersburg, Pennsylvania

June 27, 1863

The commanding general has observed with marked satisfaction the conduct of the troops on the march, and confidently anticipates results commensurate with the high spirit they have manifested.

No troops could have displayed greater fortitude or better performed the arduous marches of the past ten days.

Their conduct in other respects has with few exceptions been in keeping with their character as soldiers, and entitles them to approbation and praise.

There have however been instances of forgetfulness on the part of some, that they have in keeping the yet unsullied reputation of the army, and that the duties expected of us by civilization and Christianity are not less obligatory in the country of the enemy than in our own.

The commanding general considers that no greater disgrace could befall the army, and through it our whole people, than the perpetration of the barbarous outrages upon the unarmed, and defenceless [sic] and the wanton destruction of private property that have marked the course of the enemy in our own country.

Such proceedings not only degrade the perpetrators and all connected with them, but are subversive of the discipline and efficiency of the army, and destructive of the ends of our present movement.

It must be remembered that we make war only upon armed men, and that we cannot take vengeance for the wrongs our people have suffered without lowering ourselves in the eyes of all whose abhorrence has been excited by the atrocities of our enemies, and offending against Him to whom vengeance belongeth, without whose favor and support our efforts must all prove in vain.

The commanding general therefore earnestly exhorts the troops to abstain with most scrupulous care from unnecessary or wanton injury to private property, and he enjoins upon all officers to arrest and bring to summary punishment all who shall in any way offend against the orders on this subject.

R. E. Lee

General
 
So there were so many instances of these incursions into civilian homes that General Lee had to remind his troops to refrain from such behavior. Thanks for that valuable input.
 
So there were so many instances of these incursions into civilian homes that General Lee had to remind his troops to refrain from such behavior. Thanks for that valuable input.


No he meant that the confederate army shouldn't practice the same atrocities that your people practiced against civilians as a measure of revenge.
 
I wonder if any of the confederate sympathizers on here would agree that there were undoubtedly instances when confederate soldiers, for whatever reason, broke into the homes of civilians in the dead of night and frightened women and children who were awakened from their slumber by their incursion?
Look who's here, the internet's worst pervert.
 
No he meant that the confederate army shouldn't practice the same atrocities that your people practiced against civilians as a measure of revenge.

it seems like you might like to think you know what he "meant", but he clearly stated that his troops had not always been on the up and up. So... does breaking into a union home in the dead of night while foraging for food make those starving rebels "terrorists" or not? I mean, they certainly must have "terrorized" the women and children in those homes when they broke in, wouldn't you agree?
 
my neighbors are awesome. lots of interesting local folks and lots of really adventurous and exciting expatriates. and the town is remarkably safe and beautiful. I think it's about time to make my wife and I some bloody mary's and go float around in the pool.
 
and I am fairly certain that my wife and children would be scared shitless if a bunch of toothless southern rednecks broke into our home in the dead of night looking for a scrap of food... ;)
 
Back
Top