What Is A Woman?

domer76 said:
I know the definition of sex vs. gender. Obviously, you do not.

Kinda like “woke”. You righties seem to think you can concoct your own definitions.
Click to expand...


Hey, cool lie bro.

Woke: From urban vernacular - pidgin English for "awakened," with the term I be Woke, or I is Woke. Initially used in the mid-Obama era to reference those who are no longer "fooled" by societal norms and reject American culture becoming aware that society is not as presented.

This quickly devolved into a statement of fealty to Marxist social warfare. Particularly in regard to BLM and Transsexualism. A major part of the Woke Anti-Culture movement is anti-white racism. The 1619 project and various anti-white initiatives fit into the Woke paradigm. Much of the Woke ideology follows traditional Leninism in focusing on grooming children to break familial bonds to create stronger loyalty directly to the party. In the end, "Woke" is rebranding of socialist revolutionary philosophy, particularly Maoism.
 
AProudLefty said:
I never said that I was uncomfortable. I accept the definition. Always have.

The question asked of Justice Jackson was a trap question. If she had answered with that definition, it would have been a "gotcha" moment and they would have asked her more trick questions. She knew it was a trap.
Click to expand...

Oh course you accept it because that's what a fucking woman is!!!!!

So the truth is now a "gotcha moment"? So instead of speaking the truth Jackson thought it was a better to say she couldn't tell us what a woman is because she's not a biologist???? Really???? And you think a person with that little fortitude or intellect should be in the SC? Im no veterinarian but I know a fucking dog when i see one. I don't "assign" that I identify it as that. Thanks what we have fucking come to and all in the name of what? Not offending people. Fuck that
 
Yakuda said:
Oh course you accept it because that's what a fucking woman is!!!!!

So the truth is now a "gotcha moment"? So instead of speaking the truth Jackson thought it was a better to say she couldn't tell us what a woman is because she's not a biologist???? Really???? And you think a person with that little fortitude or intellect should be in the SC? Im no veterinarian but I know a fucking dog when i see one. I don't "assign" that I identify it as that. Thanks what we have fucking come to and all in the name of what? Not offending people. Fuck that
Click to expand...

Because the topic was about male athletes in female sports. You KNOW it was a trick question due to the nature of the topic.

If she had answered with the definition, they, then, would have asked a series of trick questions regarding transgenderism and sports. I know you know that and understand that.

Besides, what does the question have to do with her job as a Justice? If a case does come through, they will address that. Simple.
 
ExpressLane said:
I depend on science not some idiot that writes the dictionary and wants to be politically correct. For thousands of years a billions of people , males have been men and females have been women.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I know. You think you can just make up your own definitions to suit your mental needs.

Robert Heinlein had a quote that describes you and your buds perfectly.

“ You can sway a thousand men by appealing to their prejudices quicker than you can convince one man by logic.”
 
AProudLefty said:
Because the topic was about male athletes in female sports. You KNOW it was a trick question due to the nature of the topic.

If she had answered with the definition, they, then, would have asked a series of trick questions regarding transgenderism and sports. I know you know that and understand that.

Besides, what does the question have to do with her job as a Justice? If a case does come through, they will address that. Simple.
Click to expand...

The intent of the questioner is irrelevant to the validity of the answer. If she spoke the truth and they tried to trap her as a result, that would be on them. Instead she said she couldnt answer because shes not a biologist. That's just utter stupidity and apparently she will make decisions based not on truth but some other standard like popular opinion.
 
Yakuda said:
The intent of the questioner is irrelevant to the validity of the answer. If she spoke the truth and they tried to trap her as a result, that would be on them. Instead she said she couldnt answer because shes not a biologist. That's just utter stupidity and apparently she will make decisions based not on truth but some other standard like popular opinion.
Click to expand...

I see it differently. They were being childish, asking that dumb question that had nothing to do with the job as a Justice. Like I said, if a relevant case does go through, they will cover it very well. Many, many cases go through. Should they ask other dumb questions to make sure she get a good grasp of any potential case that may go her way?

It's like asking to please define life when the topic of abortion comes up. It's a trick question too.
 
AProudLefty said:
I see it differently. They were being childish, asking that dumb question that had nothing to do with the job as a Justice. Like I said, if a relevant case does go through, they will cover it very well. Many, many cases go through. Should they ask other dumb questions to make sure she get a good grasp of any potential case that may go her way?

It's like asking to please define life when the topic of abortion comes up. It's a trick question too.
Click to expand...

You don't think the definition of words has anything to do with the job? My problem is she said she couldnt answer because she not a biologist. Even if she had instead said what you said here, id still think it was a lame response but she wouldn't have looked so stupid. It looked like she was afraid to say what she knew was true just to capitulate to popular opinion. Not what I most like to see in a judge.
 
Yakuda said:
You don't think the definition of words has anything to do with the job? My problem is she said she couldnt answer because she not a biologist. Even if she had instead said what you said here, id still think it was a lame response but she wouldn't have looked so stupid. It looked like she was afraid to say what she knew was true just to capitulate to popular opinion. Not what I most like to see in a judge.
Click to expand...

Okay.

Why did they ask her that dumb question? What relevancy does it have to do with anything?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top