What is the difference between Trump saying he'd accept foreign information

anatta said:
good gawd almighty..you are not familiar with how the Steele dossier
was composed by Steele in exchange for money from Fusion GPS after being laundered thru law firm Perkins Coie ?

here is a WAPO article -is this an acceptable source?

Clinton campaign, DNC paid for research that led to Russia dossier
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...3470754bbb9_story.html?utm_term=.bc79ef6c2f51
Click to expand...

She's mentioned in the past that she gets her "news" from FB and Twitter......doesn't watch any TV coverage on any network. Then she comes in here
wanting everyone to do the research FOR her.......which really doesn't matter, she'll only claim that it's a lie and not believe you anyway. It's a way to
ensure that no matter what facts you present her with, she'll feel correct with only her opinion to back her up.
 
Stretch said:
She's mentioned in the past that she gets her "news" from FB and Twitter......doesn't watch any TV coverage on any network. Then she comes in here
wanting everyone to do the research FOR her.......which really doesn't matter, she'll only claim that it's a lie and not believe you anyway. It's a way to
ensure that no matter what facts you present her with, she'll feel correct with only her opinion to back her up.
Click to expand...
all the focus was on Mueller,and Mueller did not focus on the "real Russian collusion" of Steele and the DNC.
So this might be new ( to give a benefit of a doubt)..but it's all gonna blow up real soon.
Barr isn't foooing around and neither is Durham
 
anatta said:
all the focus was on Mueller,and Mueller did not focus on the "real Russian collusion" of Steele and the DNC.
So this might be new ( to give a benefit of a doubt)..but it's all gonna blow up real soon.
Barr isn't fooling around and neither is Durham
Click to expand...

They're going for the gold on the swamp, that's for sure. Dems keep trying to throw more stuff at the wall,
desperate for ANYTHING to stick at this point.
But.......... :note:they don't know where they're gonna go when the volcano blows!:note: :awesome:

 
anatta said:
CFR mentions "anything of value" but then goes on to list money or fungible goods and services as a "anything of value"

DOMER has been preaching the same CRAP over and over even when it was explained that simple opposition research
( even paying for it like Hillary did) is not "anything of value" other then tangible goods

I even explained how free speech covers op research.

these people are argumentative without a purpose losers without an ability to digest information
other then the delusion crap they come up with
Click to expand...

This is why I posted that Trump outplayed the left again with his comments to Stepphy

The left is forced to talk about Crooked Hillary’s behavior

Trump is genius. Playing 4D chess. Dumber Domer is playing tiddlywinks
 
Teflon Don said:
This is why I posted that Trump outplayed the left again with his comments to Stepphy

The left is forced to talk about Crooked Hillary’s behavior

Trump is genius. Playing 4D chess. Dumber Domer is playing tiddlywinks
Click to expand...


what part of the law is fuckin you up asshole?

Foreign nationals

Campaigns may not solicit or accept contributions from foreign nationals. Federal law prohibits contributions, donations, expenditures and disbursements solicited, directed, received or made directly or indirectly by or from foreign nationals in connection with any election — federal, state or local. This prohibition includes contributions or donations made to political committees and building funds and to make electioneering communications. Furthermore, it is a violation of federal law to knowingly provide substantial assistance in the making, acceptance or receipt of contributions or donations in connection with federal and nonfederal elections to a political committee, or for the purchase or construction of an office building. This prohibition includes, but is not limited to, acting as a conduit or intermediary for foreign national contributions and donations.

A person acts knowingly for the purposes of this section when he or she has:

Actual knowledge that the funds have come from a foreign national;
Awareness of certain facts that would lead a reasonable person to believe that there is a substantial probability that the money is from a foreign national; or
Awareness of facts that should have prompted a reasonable inquiry into whether the source of funds is a foreign national.

Pertinent facts that satisfy the “knowing” requirement include knowledge of:

Use of a foreign passport or passport number;
Use of a foreign address;
A check or other written instrument drawn on an account or wire transfer from a foreign bank; or
Contributor or donor living abroad.

Definition of foreign national

A foreign national is:

An individual who is not a citizen of the United States, and not lawfully admitted for permanent residence (as defined in 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(20)); or
A foreign principal, as defined in 22 U.S.C. § 611(b). Section 611 defines a foreign principal as a group organized under the laws of a foreign country or having its principal place of business in a foreign country. The statute specifically mentions foreign governments, political parties, partnerships, associations and corporations.

“Green card” exception

An individual who is not a citizen of the United States is eligible to make a contribution if he or she has a “green card” indicating that he or she is lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States.
 
reagansghost said:
what part of the law is fuckin you up asshole?

Foreign nationals

Campaigns may not solicit or accept contributions from foreign nationals. Federal law prohibits contributions, donations, expenditures and disbursements solicited, directed, received or made directly or indirectly by or from foreign nationals in connection with any election — federal, state or local. This prohibition includes contributions or donations made to political committees and building funds and to make electioneering communications. Furthermore, it is a violation of federal law to knowingly provide substantial assistance in the making, acceptance or receipt of contributions or donations in connection with federal and nonfederal elections to a political committee, or for the purchase or construction of an office building. This prohibition includes, but is not limited to, acting as a conduit or intermediary for foreign national contributions and donations.

A person acts knowingly for the purposes of this section when he or she has:

Actual knowledge that the funds have come from a foreign national;
Awareness of certain facts that would lead a reasonable person to believe that there is a substantial probability that the money is from a foreign national; or
Awareness of facts that should have prompted a reasonable inquiry into whether the source of funds is a foreign national.

Pertinent facts that satisfy the “knowing” requirement include knowledge of:

Use of a foreign passport or passport number;
Use of a foreign address;
A check or other written instrument drawn on an account or wire transfer from a foreign bank; or
Contributor or donor living abroad.

Definition of foreign national

A foreign national is:

An individual who is not a citizen of the United States, and not lawfully admitted for permanent residence (as defined in 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(20)); or
A foreign principal, as defined in 22 U.S.C. § 611(b). Section 611 defines a foreign principal as a group organized under the laws of a foreign country or having its principal place of business in a foreign country. The statute specifically mentions foreign governments, political parties, partnerships, associations and corporations.

“Green card” exception

An individual who is not a citizen of the United States is eligible to make a contribution if he or she has a “green card” indicating that he or she is lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States.
Click to expand...

And you just proved his point exactly. Christ are you fucking stupid.
 
reagansghost said:
what part of the law is fuckin you up asshole?

Foreign nationals

Campaigns may not solicit or accept contributions from foreign nationals. Federal law prohibits contributions, donations, expenditures and disbursements solicited, directed, received or made directly or indirectly by or from foreign nationals in connection with any election — federal, state or local. This prohibition includes contributions or donations made to political committees and building funds and to make electioneering communications. Furthermore, it is a violation of federal law to knowingly provide substantial assistance in the making, acceptance or receipt of contributions or donations in connection with federal and nonfederal elections to a political committee, or for the purchase or construction of an office building. This prohibition includes, but is not limited to, acting as a conduit or intermediary for foreign national contributions and donations.

A person acts knowingly for the purposes of this section when he or she has:

Actual knowledge that the funds have come from a foreign national;
Awareness of certain facts that would lead a reasonable person to believe that there is a substantial probability that the money is from a foreign national; or
Awareness of facts that should have prompted a reasonable inquiry into whether the source of funds is a foreign national.

Pertinent facts that satisfy the “knowing” requirement include knowledge of:

Use of a foreign passport or passport number;
Use of a foreign address;
A check or other written instrument drawn on an account or wire transfer from a foreign bank; or
Contributor or donor living abroad.

Definition of foreign national

A foreign national is:

An individual who is not a citizen of the United States, and not lawfully admitted for permanent residence (as defined in 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(20)); or
A foreign principal, as defined in 22 U.S.C. § 611(b). Section 611 defines a foreign principal as a group organized under the laws of a foreign country or having its principal place of business in a foreign country. The statute specifically mentions foreign governments, political parties, partnerships, associations and corporations.

“Green card” exception

An individual who is not a citizen of the United States is eligible to make a contribution if he or she has a “green card” indicating that he or she is lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States.
Click to expand...

And YOU are an Unidentified Foreign Object.
 
Damocles said:
Desperately trying to defend the indefensible, I bet you didn't realize you had so much in common with how you perceive your "enemy".

I have given you the definition, you simply apply a crowbar, try to make the square block fit in the round hole and hope everybody is too stupid to realize that your definition is different than the actual law. I've given you links to the definition and your only response is to repeat without even refining. The reality is, your wish doesn't make reality, and your assumption that it is somehow a contribution to hear words is beyond stupid.
Click to expand...

You haven't defined shit, pal. You gave the FEC definition of contribution. Here are the definitions from 11 CFR 110.2 and 11 CFR 300.2. Reference "donation, moron.

11 CFR 300.2

(e)Donation. For purposes of part 300, donation means a payment, gift, subscription, loan, advance, deposit, or anything of value given to a person, but does not include contributions.”

(m)To solicit. For the purposes of part 300, to solicit means to ask, request, or recommend, explicitly or implicitly, that another person make a contribution, donation, transfer of funds, or otherwise provide anything of value. A solicitation is an oral or written communication that, construed as reasonably understood in the context in which it is made, contains a clear message asking, requesting, or recommending that another person make a contribution, donation, transfer of funds, or otherwise provide anything of value. A solicitation may be made directly or indirectly. The context includes the conduct of persons involved in the communication. A solicitation does not include mere statements of political support or mere guidance as to the applicability of a particular law or regulation.

11CFR 110.2

(b)Contributions and donations by foreign nationals in connection with elections. A foreign national shall not, directly or indirectly, make a contribution or a donation of money or other thing of value, or expressly or impliedly promise to make a contribution or a donation, in connection with any Federal, State, or local election.

(g)Solicitation, acceptance, or receipt of contributions and donations from foreign nationals. No person shall knowingly solicit, accept, or receive from a foreign national any contribution or donation prohibited by paragraphs (b) through (d) of this section.

Like it or not, dumbfuck, Trump solicited something of value on national TV the other night.

Like it or not, dumbfuck, by inviting the Russians to Trump Tower for dirt on Hillary, he solicited something of value.
 
Damocles said:
Repeating what was proven to be wrong when presented with the actual definition in the law doesn't change that it was wrong. You can keep repeating it, but all you have left, even according to your own people in Congress is a hopeful belief that others will think there was "Obstruction", not "collusion". The experts, even those on your own side, disagree with you and this person.
Click to expand...

Here's the actual definition in the law, dumbfuck. Donation, not contribution, moron.

11 CFR 300.2
(e)Donation. For purposes of part 300, donation means a payment, gift, subscription, loan, advance, deposit, or anything of value given to a person, but does not include contributions.”

(m)To solicit. For the purposes of part 300, to solicit means to ask, request, or recommend, explicitly or implicitly, that another person make a contribution, donation, transfer of funds, or otherwise provide anything of value. A solicitation is an oral or written communication that, construed as reasonably understood in the context in which it is made, contains a clear message asking, requesting, or recommending that another person make a contribution, donation, transfer of funds, or otherwise provide anything of value. A solicitation may be made directly or indirectly. The context includes the conduct of persons involved in the communication. A solicitation does not include mere statements of political support or mere guidance as to the applicability of a particular law or regulation.

11CFR 110.2

(b)Contributions and donations by foreign nationals in connection with elections. A foreign national shall not, directly or indirectly, make a contribution or a donation of money or other thing of value, or expressly or impliedly promise to make a contribution or a donation, in connection with any Federal, State, or local election.

(g)Solicitation, acceptance, or receipt of contributions and donations from foreign nationals. No person shall knowingly solicit, accept, or receive from a foreign national any contribution or donation prohibited by paragraphs (b) through (d) of this section.
 
Darth Omar said:
But I thought there was collusion lol.

You mean Donnie was unaware that there was collusion? How you could you and the despicable media hacks have gotten it so wrong and so badly, for so long?
Click to expand...

Nope, stupid fuck, that's not what I mean.

What I mean, illiterate fuck, is that the only reason Donnie was not indicted is that Mueller thought there insufficient proof (beyond a reasonable doubt) that Donnie knew he was breaking the law. In other words that Donnie was too fucking stupid to now that meeting with foreign agents to obtain dirt on an opponent was improper. :rofl2: How fucking stupid is that?
 
Teflon Don said:
So that was the goal from the get go? Hillary was investigating FOR the FBI?

Seems like odd political behavior.

Do you know of other political campaigns that have dine what Hillary did?
Click to expand...

Nope, illiterate dumfuck, she wasn't. How in the fuck you morons jump from simple English to your bizarre fantasies is beyond me. Merely your pathetic lack of reading comprehension.

You mean paid a company to do opposition research? Even you can't be that stupid.

Wait. Yes you are.

:rofl2:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top