Just an observer of reality.so now you claim to speak for God?
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Just an observer of reality.so now you claim to speak for God?
There's really no pattern to most religious beliefs. They appear to have been whatever appealed to the con artists in charge at the time.random? like they were just pulled out of your ass?
Ohh wait..that's the contents of this post
Yet it's the right that is trying to encode their religious beliefs into law.founders wanted religious freedom. what you CHOOSE to believe is your freedom. no one can dictate to you if you don't want to be told what to think
I dunno, I smell a troll.
The SCt ruled long ago that banning abortion is a state invasion of privacy.
So what's your take on the Covidiot Crusaders prancing around sans masks, flourishing weapons and Nazi/Confederate flags, and demanding that governments open everything back up so they can get manicures and cheeseburgers again? You stated that "the state has a duty to protect innocent life." Does that mean you oppose the Crusaders?
With any luck, all they'll accomplish is to increase the death toll among themselves. Yet another case of Darwin Awards.
The con artists are the religious leaders. Religious beliefs are a con because their only real purpose is to support the religious caste. In the beginning some at least had the goal of creating a scary figure to enforce what were thought to be essential laws for the survival of the tribe.who's the con man? why are religious beliefs a con?
With any luck, all they'll accomplish is to increase the death toll among themselves. Yet another case of Darwin Awards.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Certainly RB is not something to be proud of. The righties are even worse than your largely imaginary "hedonist society".I have no idea why Progs are so put off about religion. certainly our hedonist society is not something to be proud of
No, you're responding to a post that says things that you don't want to hear.i'm responding to a not well thought out post. the conversation wanders
Yet another religious authoritarian.Atheist push their agenda!They are going to burn in Hell and want company
Yet another diversion!I might if there was any.
Well, Republicans do keep trying to pattern the law after their religious beliefs.You made up that term. There used to be something called "family values" back in the 80s. I never heard of Christian values in a political setting, but that's the problem with you libs, you never got the hang of that "separation of Church and State" thing. You think Christian = Republican.
"Faith" meaning gullibility.WTF Mason! [emoji23] Atheists have no "agenda." They simply have an absence of faith.
The Old Testament was written by con artists, who invented a scary law enforcer to back up the laws that they wanted their sheep to follow.Disagreed. Like any other system run by man, it can become corrupted, but most, like any other system, are good.
Well, you're the Trump supporter. Thus you bear much of the responsibility.The Constitution is almost dead, the country is a wreck, and you ask me that......
It is what is True and what is Not True that The Better People track....not who has been saying what for how long.
I have no idea why Progs are so put off about religion. certainly our hedonist society is not something to be proud of
Banning the AR-15 is just code for banning all guns.Are we still talking about all guns as opposed to certain kinds of guns?
Because a lot of people will openly say we should ban the AR-15, there's no coding there. But banning all guns, I still haven't seen any Democrat or influential activist say that.
More gun control is also code for banning all guns. While stricter gun control laws might reduce gun crime they do nothing about total crime. In fact, we often see increases in some areas of crime with stricter gun control.No, I never denied that Liberals want more gun control. My only argument was that they don't want to ban all guns.