White libs always refuse to define socialism. Apparently the definition is a moving target. So I'm not surprised that you want to keep it a secret.Why? I know what it means and I know that there are no congressmen that are socialists.
White libs always refuse to define socialism. Apparently the definition is a moving target. So I'm not surprised that you want to keep it a secret.Why? I know what it means and I know that there are no congressmen that are socialists.
Ok, so you are claiming globalists have been using it to control people since the 1800's.The believed impact of CO2 on climate goes back way more than 2 decades. It goes back to the 1800's.
History of the greenhouse effect and global warming
History of the greenhouse effect and global warmingwww.lenntech.com
Agree, big oil saved the whales and the forests.It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth. No one can say what Earth was like 260 million years ago.
No one can say what Earth was like 2 million years ago.
Correct.
We actually do. As long as there is a difference of temperature from one part of the ocean to another, there WILL be currents.
No one can describe the ocean currents of 950,000 years ago.
Climate cannot change. Climate isn't a current and climate has no temperature.
Carbon is not 'sequestered'. Carbon is an element. Carbon dioxide is not carbon.
Yes it is. Less whales. Fortunately, the whales were saved by Big Oil. We don't need whales for oil lamps anymore.
The so-called 'Little Ice Age' affected only England and Europe. That is not the world.
No, they are all justifying the actions. This is not the first heinous act committed by White climate nazis.The overwhelming majority of environmentalists think they’re idiots too. So what’s your point? It’s not like liberals have cornered the market on stupidity. There’s plenty of that to go around.
excellent point.Agree, big oil saved the whales and the forests.
Geologic evidence for the LIA has been found in Japan, on the U.S. west coast, in Peru, and in South Africa.
Yep, if you are middle class, poor, or a 3rd world POC, then ...excellent point.
nuke energy would save us all.
but that's what the Nazis want, mass death from battery solutions that don't work, and STILL NEED TO BE CHAEGED SOMEWHERE!!!!!!!!
they actually prefer the green austerity that will ensue when their solutions fail terribly, after they have profitted from putting the dumb shit in place from the public private partnership better labelled green fascism.
So you won't answer the question.
You would rather try to pivot to talking about who is in Congress.
"Ok, so you are claiming globalists have been using it to control people since the 1800's."Ok, so you are claiming globalists have been using it to control people since the 1800's.
So Who hasn't heard about the CO2 hoax? Globalist Gov'ts have been indoctrinating the public for more than 2 decades.
This is the what the whole "green movement" amounts to.Yep, if you are middle class, poor, or a 3rd world POC, then ...
No cheap energy for you
No cheap food for you
No home ownership for you
However, if you are wealthy and can afford to pay a carbon offset tax to the climate czars, ... you can use all the fossil fuels your little heart desires.
So Who hasn't heard about the CO2 hoax? Globalist Gov'ts have been indoctrinating the public for more than 2 decades."Ok, so you are claiming globalists have been using it to control people since the 1800's."
Yep, because that wouldn't make me sound crazy at all.
Maybe the impact of CO2 is based in science but you're trying to make it political.So Who hasn't heard about the CO2 hoax? Globalist Gov'ts have been indoctrinating the public for more than 2 decades.
Argument of the Stone fallacy.Wrong again!
Denial of self post. That won't work, Void.I didn't ask a question.![]()
Google is not a reference nor defines any word except 'Google'.Google is your friend. You can educate yourself on the differences between the three. For example:
This part is correct.Communism - the government owns the means of production
Incorrect. While under fascism, private ownership is still retained, private control is not.Socialism - the public owns the means of production
...and fascism. You also support communism. You also support slavery. These are the three major forms of socialism.Democratic Socialism - the means of production are privately owned
What is changing?Yes it can. more than likely can.
Not possible. You cannot create energy out of nothing. You are still ignoring the 1st law of thermodynamics.It probably can.Into the Night said:CO2 also has no capability to warm the Earth.
Inversion fallacy. You cannot blame me for your problem. You are still ignoring the 1st law of thermodynamics. You cannot create energy out of nothing. No gas or vapor has the capability to create energy out of nothing.You mean the law of conservation of energy? No. That would be you.Into the Night said:You can't destroy energy when it's convenient for you.
Five. The Church of Global Warming really got popular in the early 70's, primarily driven by Carter's price control disasters.So Who hasn't heard about the CO2 hoax? Globalist Gov'ts have been indoctrinating the public for more than 2 decades.
Geology does not measure temperature of the Earth.Agree, big oil saved the whales and the forests.
Geologic evidence for the LIA has been found in Japan, on the U.S. west coast, in Peru, and in South Africa.
And, Europe has actual historical written records, unlike the Southern hemisphere which is poorly documented. Most SH temps are just assumed to match the NH. The SH temps are basically just fudged.
The law of Thermodynamics, despite your best efforts to ignore it, says energy can't be created OR destroyed. The theory on how increases in CO2 impact temperature/climate involves no creation of destruction of energy.What is changing?
Not possible. You cannot create energy out of nothing. You are still ignoring the 1st law of thermodynamics.
Inversion fallacy. You cannot blame me for your problem. You are still ignoring the 1st law of thermodynamics. You cannot create energy out of nothing. No gas or vapor has the capability to create energy out of nothing.
Define ' dumbass', dumbass.Circular definition. Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism). Void reference fallacy. That won't work, Moonbat.
You are denying science. You are denying the 1st law of thermodynamics.Maybe the impact of CO2 is based in science but you're trying to make it political.
Climate has no temperature.The law of Thermodynamics, despite your best efforts to ignore it, says energy can't be created OR destroyed. The theory on how increases in CO2 impact temperature/climate involves no creation of destruction of energy.