Who is willing to go on record saying they believe the President can defy legal court orders?

And you believe Jackson was correct?


I disagree, I believe specific powers were vested in each branch and under those powers they have the right to enforce them upon the other branches.
I think that the executive branch is about the only one that has a power to enforce. And I think that their obligations they take, what folks call their oaths (the oath portion is where they swear and affirm, their obligations is what they swear to follow)...

Anyway, all three branches swear to protect and uphold the constitution, which sets upon them an obligation and duty to interpret and work within the constitution. Jackson believed that he had as much authority to interpret as anyone in the Judicial Branch.

Enforcement falls to the executive branch. If it fell to all the branches we'd have a judicial police state.
 
BTW, as long as the Executive is willing to let folks get away with it (if the Sheriff refuses to arrest someone they tell him to, for instance) almost anyone can defy a court order.
 
With imposing sentences, remanding people to the custody of proper police, and federal or state institutions, imposing fines, sending the U.S. Marshal or State police to serve writs or mandamus or attachment. Attaching property.
Let them try with a US President. These judges are out of line and you know it. But you are a partisan hack. That is why you went from loving Elon Musk to hating him and supporting g terrorism against people who own Teslas which are most likely leftists.
 
BTW, as long as the Executive is willing to let folks get away with it (if the Sheriff refuses to arrest someone they tell him to, for instance) almost anyone can defy a court order.
At least until a new Executive is elected.
 
No one knows. That's what the judge asked about and Trump's people refuse to provide evidence it was done.

I give up. Did he? I expect he did, otherwise he could have been impeached.
The judge has no authority here, Sybil. The House is now considering impeaching him. He should be removed from office.
 
How so, I understand it much better than you.
Blatant lie (denial, synthesis).
You simply adopted a prepackaged minority view
The Constitution is not a 'view', Pretender.
of some militia group you admired.
What 'militia', Pretender????
I understand it from many different veiwpoints.
The Constitution is not a 'view', Pretender.

DON'T TRY TO HIDE BEHIND THE CONSTITUTION YOU DESPISE!
 
With imposing sentences, remanding people to the custody of proper police, and federal or state institutions, imposing fines, sending the U.S. Marshal or State police to serve writs or mandamus or attachment. Attaching property.
No sentence involved.
No police involved.
Donald Trump IS the head of the executive branch and all institutions therein.
No property involved.

Evasion. The judge has NO authority over Trump's authority over the executive branch of government. No judge has authority to change any constitution.
 
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
you don't understand the 5th Amendment. you've demonstrated that for years.
 
At least until a new Executive is elected.
Unless that new one will simply allow different folks to defy the order... of the last two only one ignored the SCOTUS, the current one says he will not. If you want him to act as you believe he should push for a SCOTUS ruling.
 
qVnpq3z.gif
That you are, Sybil.
 
Back
Top