Who is willing to go on record saying they believe the President can defy legal court orders?

Dutch Uncle said:
No one knows. That's what the judge asked about and Trump's people refuse to provide evidence it was done.
Click to expand...

The remedy is that each one of those deported can take up their case from their home country. There is ZERO reason for them to remain in the US while doing so.
Dutch Uncle said:
I give up. Did he? I expect he did, otherwise he could have been impeached.
Click to expand...
Yes, he did. He changed policy and by directive essentially allowed, unvetted millions of people to flood into the US illegally. He gave anyone who asked for asylum entry to wait until they had a hearing, possibly years from their entry date. That's not how asylum laws are written or work. Asylum is an exception, not the rule. The reasons for it being granted are narrowly defined, whereas Biden basically allowed anyone for any reason entry to await a hearing. Prior policy was you applied at the nearest US embassy to your home country and waited there.

All in all, Biden basically ignored most of US immigration law as written and opened the borders.
 
Into the Night said:
What is a 'Due Process right', Pretender??
Click to expand...
TgTsnVd.gif
 
T. A. Gardner said:
The remedy is that each one of those deported can take up their case from their home country. There is ZERO reason for them to remain in the US while doing so.

Yes, he did. He changed policy and by directive essentially allowed, unvetted millions of people to flood into the US illegally. He gave anyone who asked for asylum entry to wait until they had a hearing, possibly years from their entry date. That's not how asylum laws are written or work. Asylum is an exception, not the rule. The reasons for it being granted are narrowly defined, whereas Biden basically allowed anyone for any reason entry to await a hearing. Prior policy was you applied at the nearest US embassy to your home country and waited there.

All in all, Biden basically ignored most of US immigration law as written and opened the borders.
Click to expand...
Once again, poor Terry, you are missing the point. If they are American citizens, they can't take up their case from an El Salvadorean prison.

Given your deteriorating mental condition, I can't trust anything you say without documentation.
 
volsrocks said:
Could a Judge have ordered the D-Day invasion force to turn around?

If not why?
Click to expand...
Are you really this fucking dumb to think this drivel of yours is an adequate "what-a-bout" or dodge from the question in the subject title?

Pay attention, you dim witted, pointy hooded troll ... NO WAR HAS BEEN DECLARED. THERE IS NO INVASION FORCE OF "CARTELS" OR "ILLEGAL ALIENS/IMMIGRANTS" MASSING ON OUR SHORES TO INVADE AND TAKE CONTROL OF THE COUNTRY OR COMMITING UNIFIED ACTS OF SABOTAGE. SO THE 1798 LAW DOES NOT APPLY.

And despite a relatively recent display by various Presidents to play fast & loose with the law, a President CANNOT engage the US military into foreign conflicts willy nilly www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/when-can-a-president-use-military-force-the-answer-is-complicated

And yeah, you and the dummies in the Cheeto Jeezus government needs to READ THE CONSTITUTION, especially Article 3 legalknowledgebase.com/can-a-federal-judge-stop-an-executive-order

Got that stupid?
 
Taichiliberal said:
Are you really this fucking dumb to think this drivel of yours is an adequate "what-a-bout" or dodge from the question in the subject title?

Pay attention, you dim witted, pointy hooded troll ... NO WAR HAS BEEN DECLARED. THERE IS NO INVASION FORCE OF "CARTELS" OR "ILLEGAL ALIENS/IMMIGRANTS" MASSING ON OUR SHORES TO INVADE AND TAKE CONTROL OF THE COUNTRY OR COMMITING UNIFIED ACTS OF SABOTAGE. SO THE 1798 LAW DOES NOT APPLY.

And despite a relatively recent display by various Presidents to play fast & loose with the law, a President CANNOT engage the US military into foreign conflicts willy nilly www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/when-can-a-president-use-military-force-the-answer-is-complicated

And yeah, you and the dummies in the Cheeto Jeezus government needs to READ THE CONSTITUTION, especially Article 3 legalknowledgebase.com/can-a-federal-judge-stop-an-executive-order

Got that stupid?
Click to expand...
You should take a deep breath, climb out of your mothers basement and get some air
 
Jarod said:
Likely crickets.
Click to expand...

Dred Scott v. Sandford - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

Can?

Legally? Yes, a judge that is incorrectly interpreting the law has no authority

Militarily? Yes, they don't have antimatter weapons under the robes.

Morally? Yes, nobody is even making moral arguments; but some shallow moral arguments might go along the lines of "the will of people" or "stop stealing all the stuff".
 
Taichiliberal said:
Are you really this fucking dumb to think this drivel of yours is an adequate "what-a-bout" or dodge from the question in the subject title?

Pay attention, you dim witted, pointy hooded troll ... NO WAR HAS BEEN DECLARED. THERE IS NO INVASION FORCE OF "CARTELS" OR "ILLEGAL ALIENS/IMMIGRANTS" MASSING ON OUR SHORES TO INVADE AND TAKE CONTROL OF THE COUNTRY OR COMMITING UNIFIED ACTS OF SABOTAGE. SO THE 1798 LAW DOES NOT APPLY.

And despite a relatively recent display by various Presidents to play fast & loose with the law, a President CANNOT engage the US military into foreign conflicts willy nilly www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/when-can-a-president-use-military-force-the-answer-is-complicated

And yeah, you and the dummies in the Cheeto Jeezus government needs to READ THE CONSTITUTION, especially Article 3 legalknowledgebase.com/can-a-federal-judge-stop-an-executive-order

Got that stupid?
Click to expand...
Unhinged moron doesn't believe the President has the power to declare emergencies. Moron. :palm:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top