George Will leaving Republican Party

PostmodernProphet said:
if the pro-free market votes are idiots like you that have no intention of voting for the Republican candidate, what difference does it make?......you've already given up.....
Click to expand...

No, I have hope that before the convention the party will come to it's mind and pick a Republican to run as our candidate.
 
cawacko said:
I could list all his lies but we wouldn't be anywhere different than we are now. Jake Novak's a liberal but he has a pretty good take here how little truth means in this election.


If you’re still trying to catch Trump and Clinton in a lie, you’re missing the point

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/06/23/if-y...a-lie-youre-missing-the-point-commentary.html
Click to expand...

Gosh, you're actually turning to cnbc now?

I'm axing you to provide evidence of your accusation, not a listing of "all his lies". Humor me; list one.

We all know Hillary's lie about Benghazi to parents of those deceased. Find one of Trumps that is comparable.
 
Right said:
Gosh, you're actually turning to cnbc now?

I'm axing you to provide evidence of your accusation, not a listing of "all his lies". Humor me; list one.

We all know Hillary's lie about Benghazi to parents of those deceased. Find one of Trumps that is comparable.
Click to expand...

I can give a list of Trump's lies but if you're asking for one comparable to Benghazi that's a different question.

As an aside, do you disagree with Novak on what he wrote? (I never realized CNBC was that bad)
 
cawacko said:
I can give a list of Trump's lies but if you're asking for one comparable to Benghazi that's a different question.

As an aside, do you disagree with Novak on what he wrote? (I never realized CNBC was that bad)
Click to expand...

So what lies has he told? "No, that dress doesn't make you look fat."?

No I didn't read Novak. I don't see how his opinion is relevant to the discussion.
 
Right said:
So what lies has he told? "No, that dress doesn't make you look fat."?

No I didn't read Novak. I don't see how his opinion is relevant to the discussion.
Click to expand...

From the conservative DailyWire:

http://www.dailywire.com/news/4834/trumps-101-lies-hank-berrien


From the conservative RedState three days ago about fundraising lies:

http://www.redstate.com/streiff/2016/06/27/donald-trump-lies-world-fundraising-total/


Hillary Clinton would be struck down by lightening if she told the truth but she's safe because she doesn't know how. Yet he's still losing to her.

All politicians lie. Trump and Clinton take it to another level.
 
cawacko said:
From the conservative DailyWire:

http://www.dailywire.com/news/4834/trumps-101-lies-hank-berrien


From the conservative RedState three days ago about fundraising lies:

http://www.redstate.com/streiff/2016/06/27/donald-trump-lies-world-fundraising-total/


Hillary Clinton would be struck down by lightening if she told the truth but she's safe because she doesn't know how. Yet he's still losing to her.

All politicians lie. Trump and Clinton take it to another level.
Click to expand...

Are you saying everything Hillary says is a lie? Everything!
 
cawacko said:
From the conservative DailyWire:

http://www.dailywire.com/news/4834/trumps-101-lies-hank-berrien


From the conservative RedState three days ago about fundraising lies:

http://www.redstate.com/streiff/2016/06/27/donald-trump-lies-world-fundraising-total/


Hillary Clinton would be struck down by lightening if she told the truth but she's safe because she doesn't know how. Yet he's still losing to her.

All politicians lie. Trump and Clinton take it to another level.
Click to expand...
Let's look at the first two.
1. March 30: Trump claims MSNBC edited their released version of his interview with Chris Matthews in which Trump stumbled on abortion: “You really ought to hear the whole thing. I mean, this is a long convoluted question. This was a long discussion, and they just cut it out. And, frankly, it was extremely — it was really convoluted.” Nope; that was a lie.

2. March 29: Trump lies that Wisconsin’s effective unemployment rate is 20%, saying, ""What? Is it 20 percent? Effective or regular? I mean just -- effective unemployment rate, 20 percent. Hey, this is out of the big book." According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, The U-3 official unemployment rate in Wisconsin was 4.6 percent in 2015; Wisconsin’s U-6 rate for 2015 was 8.3 percent.
Click to expand...

1. I don't watch MSNBC, but all networks edit interviews either as original broadcast as snippets for other shows. I'm sure almost no one saw the entire interview or read the entire transcript. Trump may be technically incorrect, but that's certainly not a lie.

2. Stats. What can I say? THe way GovCo doctors up the unemployment rate when a Democrat is president is the lie. You and I both know Trump's number is probably closer to the truth.
 
cawacko said:
This wasn't your question but what it does do is make him look really dumb. He claims Hispanics love him but a judge born in Indiana, appointed by a Republican Schwarzenegger, who has Mexican parents can't partially judge a case of his? And then people wonder why his negative numbers with Hispanic voters are what they are. Not to mention this trial has nothing to do with the campaign, its about him as normal, and he did this during a time when bad economic numbers came out. Instead of talking about those he focused on this.

You're obviously free to debate whether his comment meets the technical term of racism but ultimately that is irrelevant in terms of how it was perceived by voters.
Click to expand...

Yes it does correlate with my question and you're just avoiding AGAIN. :D

In your following comment, you said he was a racist.

Establishment said:
Well, he's apparently not homophobic or "transphobic," but he's definitely racist and sexist. Since he prefers to never tell the truth, he is one of the biggest liars to ever seek the presidency.
Click to expand...

I then questioned your assessment.

USFREEDOM911 said:
What makes him a racist?
Click to expand...

You responded, using the Judge's name.

Establishment said:
Curiel.
Click to expand...

I then asked how that makes Trump a racist.
USFREEDOM911 said:
How does the Judge make Trump a racist and please don't just use all the liberal talking points?
Click to expand...

And you decided to once again try to move the goal posts and avoid your statement and now seem to be suggesting that it's now the definition of the word that's important; but instead how others perceive the definition.

Does this hold true for all words or only the ones that liberals choose to reassign meanings to?
 
Establishment said:
Does Trump need to drop racial slurs on Curiel in order for you to qualify is statements as racist? I'm just curious what your bogus parameters are. And I can cite talking points from National Review.
Click to expand...

The "bogus parameters" seem to be coming from the liberal side of the political fence; because they keep saying he's a racist and when challenged to show proof, they either fold or lie.

Link me to a statement he made, that was racist or just accept the fact that this is just another liberal red herring.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top