The Horror Of Slavery.

coolzone

Banned
One of the horrors of it is that it never really went away. They just put a different label on it. Freedom. Quite a paradox, isn't it. Such as the freedom in the early 20'th century to allow people from Ireland and Italy to immigrate here. To be exploited! When all you fools out there say that immigration made America great, you are really saying that exploitation through wage slavery made America "great." In that regard, I wish the U.S. was FAR less "great."

There is also a lot of crap being spouted about the negroes having been made slaves. But at least they were taken care of by their masters. Unlike when they were "freed." Where they had to fend for themselves. The same sort of thing is going on with sending U.S. jobs overseas to wage slave countries. The U.S. doesn't have to care at all how they are treated over there.

Here is another thing about the enslavement of negroes. To this day it still happens in Africa. So who is any negro here to complain about what the South did long ago. Also, what would the vast majority of negroes here today say if given one of these two choices. 1. To be living in Africa right now. 2. Their ancestors having been made slaves here. Care to guess which they would most likely choose?

Somebody in another thread said that in the South they have a Confederate Memorial day. I would have to look it up to see if it is true. But if it is, it is a holiday that every negro down there should be glad to celebrate!
 
One of the horrors of it is that it never really went away. They just put a different label on it. Freedom. Quite a paradox, isn't it. Such as the freedom in the early 20'th century to allow people from Ireland and Italy to immigrate here. To be exploited! When all you fools out there say that immigration made America great, you are really saying that exploitation through wage slavery made America "great." In that regard, I wish the U.S. was FAR less "great."

There is also a lot of crap being spouted about the negroes having been made slaves. But at least they were taken care of by their masters. Unlike when they were "freed." Where they had to fend for themselves. The same sort of thing is going on with sending U.S. jobs overseas to wage slave countries. The U.S. doesn't have to care at all how they are treated over there.

Here is another thing about the enslavement of negroes. To this day it still happens in Africa. So who is any negro here to complain about what the South did long ago. Also, what would the vast majority of negroes here today say if given one of these two choices. 1. To be living in Africa right now. 2. Their ancestors having been made slaves here. Care to guess which they would most likely choose?

Somebody in another thread said that in the South they have a Confederate Memorial day. I would have to look it up to see if it is true. But if it is, it is a holiday that every negro down there should be glad to celebrate!

The CSA didn't bring blacks to America, seeing as how the slave trade had long before been abolished. All it did was start a war with America in which 400k+ Americans died and 250k+ Confederates died.
 
One of the horrors of it is that it never really went away. They just put a different label on it. Freedom. Quite a paradox, isn't it. Such as the freedom in the early 20'th century to allow people from Ireland and Italy to immigrate here. To be exploited! When all you fools out there say that immigration made America great, you are really saying that exploitation through wage slavery made America "great." In that regard, I wish the U.S. was FAR less "great."

There is also a lot of crap being spouted about the negroes having been made slaves. But at least they were taken care of by their masters. Unlike when they were "freed." Where they had to fend for themselves. The same sort of thing is going on with sending U.S. jobs overseas to wage slave countries. The U.S. doesn't have to care at all how they are treated over there.

Here is another thing about the enslavement of negroes. To this day it still happens in Africa. So who is any negro here to complain about what the South did long ago. Also, what would the vast majority of negroes here today say if given one of these two choices. 1. To be living in Africa right now. 2. Their ancestors having been made slaves here. Care to guess which they would most likely choose?

Somebody in another thread said that in the South they have a Confederate Memorial day. I would have to look it up to see if it is true. But if it is, it is a holiday that every negro down there should be glad to celebrate!
We’ve always been sensitive here in Ohio in regards to Confederates, those with brain injury and all mentally challenged people.
 
One of the horrors of it is that it never really went away. They just put a different label on it. Freedom. Quite a paradox, isn't it. Such as the freedom in the early 20'th century to allow people from Ireland and Italy to immigrate here. To be exploited! When all you fools out there say that immigration made America great, you are really saying that exploitation through wage slavery made America "great." In that regard, I wish the U.S. was FAR less "great."

What about the British, French, and Spanish that immigrated here first. Were they also exploited wage slaves? Would you prefer to be somebody's slave and have somebody take care of you or be free?
 
One of the horrors of it is that it never really went away. They just put a different label on it. Freedom. Quite a paradox, isn't it. Such as the freedom in the early 20'th century to allow people from Ireland and Italy to immigrate here. To be exploited! When all you fools out there say that immigration made America great, you are really saying that exploitation through wage slavery made America "great." In that regard, I wish the U.S. was FAR less "great."

There is also a lot of crap being spouted about the negroes having been made slaves. But at least they were taken care of by their masters. Unlike when they were "freed." Where they had to fend for themselves. The same sort of thing is going on with sending U.S. jobs overseas to wage slave countries. The U.S. doesn't have to care at all how they are treated over there.

Here is another thing about the enslavement of negroes. To this day it still happens in Africa. So who is any negro here to complain about what the South did long ago. Also, what would the vast majority of negroes here today say if given one of these two choices. 1. To be living in Africa right now. 2. Their ancestors having been made slaves here. Care to guess which they would most likely choose?

Somebody in another thread said that in the South they have a Confederate Memorial day. I would have to look it up to see if it is true. But if it is, it is a holiday that every negro down there should be glad to celebrate!

Slavery still exists in the U.S. today. It's a self imposed form of it by blacks voting overwhelmingly for the Democratic party. Things have changed drastically on how blacks view slavery, too. People like Harriet Tubman worked to free slaves from its horrors. Today, if a black escapes it by opposing the Democratic party, other blacks chastise him for wanting to leave.
 
Kanye West escaped the plantation. Better go fetch him and give him a good beating.

People like Harriet Tubman fought to free slaves from their bondage. Today, when one escapes from what is a form of slavery by supporting the Democratic party, the others chastise them and try to do everything but want them to be free.
 
One of the horrors of it is that it never really went away. They just put a different label on it. Freedom. Quite a paradox, isn't it. Such as the freedom in the early 20'th century to allow people from Ireland and Italy to immigrate here. To be exploited! When all you fools out there say that immigration made America great, you are really saying that exploitation through wage slavery made America "great." In that regard, I wish the U.S. was FAR less "great."

There is also a lot of crap being spouted about the negroes having been made slaves. But at least they were taken care of by their masters. Unlike when they were "freed." Where they had to fend for themselves. The same sort of thing is going on with sending U.S. jobs overseas to wage slave countries. The U.S. doesn't have to care at all how they are treated over there.

Here is another thing about the enslavement of negroes. To this day it still happens in Africa. So who is any negro here to complain about what the South did long ago. Also, what would the vast majority of negroes here today say if given one of these two choices. 1. To be living in Africa right now. 2. Their ancestors having been made slaves here. Care to guess which they would most likely choose?

Somebody in another thread said that in the South they have a Confederate Memorial day. I would have to look it up to see if it is true. But if it is, it is a holiday that every negro down there should be glad to celebrate!

Taken care of? WTF. They bred them like farm animals. They sold their kids and wives off when they felt like it, The whipped and beat them. They lived a very hard scrabble existence and many starved. They worked endless hours without getting a slice of the profits. http://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/pds/maai/enslavement/text6/masterslavesexualabuse.pdf
 
The CSA didn't bring blacks to America, seeing as how the slave trade had long before been abolished. All it did was start a war with America in which 400k+ Americans died and 250k+ Confederates died.

The Confederate states were never involved in the slave trade. They did have some people from those states who bought slaves from other negroes in Africa. So it was more of a slave buy rather than a slave trade. And I would have to doubt that the Confederate states ever made it illegal to bring more slaves in. Though even if they did, it was largely meaningless. Because as long as slavery was legal there and there was a market for new slaves, somebody would have brought them in.

As for who started the Civil war, I have heard people claim it was the North. Not the south. Likely because the Southern states had every right as states to do what they did. It may not have been moral. But they had the right to do it. Another person in Yahoo answers said that to end slavery, the North would have needed a 3/4 majority in the senate. They didn't have that until the southern states seceded. So if the Southern states had stayed in the Union, slavery would have been much harder to end. With that being the case, there must have been something that goaded the Southern states into rebellion. You would need an unbiased historian to give you the real answer. I myself am no expert in the Civil war. All I have ever heard on TV or in school about it is history as presented by the winning side.
 
The Confederate states were never involved in the slave trade. They did have some people from those states who bought slaves from other negroes in Africa. So it was more of a slave buy rather than a slave trade. And I would have to doubt that the Confederate states ever made it illegal to bring more slaves in. Though even if they did, it was largely meaningless. Because as long as slavery was legal there and there was a market for new slaves, somebody would have brought them in.

As for who started the Civil war, I have heard people claim it was the North. Not the south. Likely because the Southern states had every right as states to do what they did. It may not have been moral. But they had the right to do it. Another person in Yahoo answers said that to end slavery, the North would have needed a 3/4 majority in the senate. They didn't have that until the southern states seceded. So if the Southern states had stayed in the Union, slavery would have been much harder to end. With that being the case, there must have been something that goaded the Southern states into rebellion. You would need an unbiased historian to give you the real answer. I myself am no expert in the Civil war. All I have ever heard on TV or in school about it is history as presented by the winning side.

The CSA attacked an American fort, which is what started the Civil War.

Yes, the North could not have abolished slavery if the South had not seceded. The south had two primary concerns. In the long-term, the efforts by the North to settle the Western territories as free states could eventually have created a 3/4 majority in favor of abolition. Immediately, however, the South was incensed at the very mention of abolition. They found the mere talk of it to be offensive, which does not suggest that they were highly reasonable or rational people.
 
What about the British, French, and Spanish that immigrated here first. Were they also exploited wage slaves? Would you prefer to be somebody's slave and have somebody take care of you or be free?

I wasn't talking about the first Europeans to have colonized North America. I was talking more along the lines of that jewish "Give us your tired, your poor" crap written at the Statue of Liberty. What we got were a lot of moronic lowlifes who were stupid enough to believe that they were going to be able to immigrate here and take their ease.

As for the British, one of them was Benjamin Franklin. In his younger years, he had to escape to another state to be free from indentured servitude - slavery. In many cases, the same was probably true of the French and Spanish. You have probably heard the term "Eat or be eaten." Well they probably operated in a similar manner as they do today. Which is "Enslave or be enslaved."
 
Last edited:
Slavery still exists in the U.S. today. It's a self imposed form of it by blacks voting overwhelmingly for the Democratic party. Things have changed drastically on how blacks view slavery, too. People like Harriet Tubman worked to free slaves from its horrors. Today, if a black escapes it by opposing the Democratic party, other blacks chastise him for wanting to leave.

Your logic is faulty. First, it doesn't matter if you vote democrat or republican. You will be a slave either way to business interests. Secondly the reason many negroes vote democrat is because they are the ones more likely to take freedoms away from White people. In effect, enslaving them. For example, as a business owner you should have the freedom to run your business any way you like. And you should have the freedom to do business with or hire whoever you want. But do White business owners today have the freedom to decline doing business with or hiring negroes? No. Which is yet another reinforcing layer of enslavement.
b9QvWUr.jpg
 

Attachments

  • LBJ 2.jpg
    LBJ 2.jpg
    21 KB · Views: 3
Last edited:
Taken care of? WTF. They bred them like farm animals. They sold their kids and wives off when they felt like it, The whipped and beat them. They lived a very hard scrabble existence and many starved. They worked endless hours without getting a slice of the profits. http://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/pds/maai/enslavement/text6/masterslavesexualabuse.pdf

Let me guess. You believe the holocaust was real too. As for any breeding done, I'm sure the negroes themselves took care of that. Also, throughout history it has been known that you don't treat your working animals badly. Because if you do so, you won't get as much work out of them. Another thing is who gave them clothing, food or a place to live. (Keep in mind that Abraham Lincoln was raised in a log cabin) The tooth fairy? Santa Claus? Also, keep in mind that if they had been allowed to do so, many slaves would have fought for the South. Does all of this sound "revisionist" to you or does it just make sense.
 
One of the horrors of it is that it never really went away. They just put a different label on it. Freedom. Quite a paradox, isn't it. Such as the freedom in the early 20'th century to allow people from Ireland and Italy to immigrate here. To be exploited! When all you fools out there say that immigration made America great, you are really saying that exploitation through wage slavery made America "great." In that regard, I wish the U.S. was FAR less "great."

There is also a lot of crap being spouted about the negroes having been made slaves. But at least they were taken care of by their masters. Unlike when they were "freed." Where they had to fend for themselves. The same sort of thing is going on with sending U.S. jobs overseas to wage slave countries. The U.S. doesn't have to care at all how they are treated over there.

Here is another thing about the enslavement of negroes. To this day it still happens in Africa. So who is any negro here to complain about what the South did long ago. Also, what would the vast majority of negroes here today say if given one of these two choices. 1. To be living in Africa right now. 2. Their ancestors having been made slaves here. Care to guess which they would most likely choose?

Somebody in another thread said that in the South they have a Confederate Memorial day. I would have to look it up to see if it is true. But if it is, it is a holiday that every negro down there should be glad to celebrate!

I had an acquaintance (not a friend) who was a rich bitch super republican with an autographed picture of him with nixon on his wall. He came from humble beginnings, unlike most republicans, and soon became a millionaire after getting out of the navy. He made his money in real estate. He would build shithole apartments in low class neighborhoods and rent them to mostly poor minorities who were often subsidized by Section 8 grants.

By renting these roach and vermin infested apartments he became one of the richest slum lords in norfolk, VA.

Think about it. He was against government spending yet was supported by the navy half of his life. Then he made his fortune with government subsidized housing while renting to the people he hated, the blacks.

He had an authentic letter written by a former slave framed and hanging on his office wall. The letter was about a former slave writing to an official begging to become a slave again. He made sure to point it out to his office visitors.

He had a t-shirt with a picture of mickey mouse on it with the words, "He who ends up with the most toys wins"

May he rot in hell. Amen.
 
The CSA attacked an American fort, which is what started the Civil War.

Yes, the North could not have abolished slavery if the South had not seceded. The south had two primary concerns. In the long-term, the efforts by the North to settle the Western territories as free states could eventually have created a 3/4 majority in favor of abolition. Immediately, however, the South was incensed at the very mention of abolition. They found the mere talk of it to be offensive, which does not suggest that they were highly reasonable or rational people.

From what I hear, the southern states gave U.S. troops 4 weeks to leave the fort. They didn't. Now if those troops were doing nothing in regard to slavery, why would the Southerners fired on them. It just doesn't make sense. Next, I have heard of the strife that came up from new states joining the Union. As to weather or not they would vote to support slavery. But as far as ending slavery goes, it seems to me that they would have waited until they came to that bridge before crossing it.

Now if I had been them, I would have started some sort of strife within southern starts. In which they would have broken off from their home state and started a different slave state. In effect turning one state into a few. But I don't know how the senate would have reacted to recognizing new states. Now as far as you saying that the Southerners were reasonable or rational people, there isn't a lot of that goes on in any of your states today. One glaring example is cities that become sanctuary cities for illegals.
 
I had an acquaintance (not a friend) who was a rich bitch super republican with an autographed picture of him with nixon on his wall. He came from humble beginnings, unlike most republicans, and soon became a millionaire after getting out of the navy. He made his money in real estate. He would build shithole apartments in low class neighborhoods and rent them to mostly poor minorities who were often subsidized by Section 8 grants.

By renting these roach and vermin infested apartments he became one of the richest slum lords in norfolk, VA.

Think about it. He was against government spending yet was supported by the navy half of his life. Then he made his fortune with government subsidized housing while renting to the people he hated, the blacks.

He had an authentic letter written by a former slave framed and hanging on his office wall. The letter was about a former slave writing to an official begging to become a slave again. He made sure to point it out to his office visitors.

He had a t-shirt with a picture of mickey mouse on it with the words, "He who ends up with the most toys wins"

May he rot in hell. Amen.

Does that last sentence mean he is dead? (I hope so) If so, you should go and take a shit on his grave. As for the slave letter, it is as I was telling somebody else. Many slaves were better off as slaves than they were as freed people.
 
From what I hear, the southern states gave U.S. troops 4 weeks to leave the fort. They didn't. Now if those troops were doing nothing in regard to slavery, why would the Southerners fired on them. It just doesn't make sense. Next, I have heard of the strife that came up from new states joining the Union. As to weather or not they would vote to support slavery. But as far as ending slavery goes, it seems to me that they would have waited until they came to that bridge before crossing it.

Now if I had been them, I would have started some sort of strife within southern starts. In which they would have broken off from their home state and started a different slave state. In effect turning one state into a few. But I don't know how the senate would have reacted to recognizing new states. Now as far as you saying that the Southerners were reasonable or rational people, there isn't a lot of that goes on in any of your states today. One glaring example is cities that become sanctuary cities for illegals.

The CSA had no right to order American troops out of their fort. It doesn't matter if they gave them four weeks or 99 years.

The North was offering the South a constitutional amendment protecting slavery in the south. The South rejected this, and chose secession. It's pretty clear that they were not a rational or reasonable people.
 
Back
Top