Debunking Covid stupidity part one: Vaccines DO slow the spread
- Thread starter Concart
- Start date
I responded to you "apples" where are not exponential.
exponential doesnt matter either. you act like if there was only "3 apples" instead of 9 apples"
there would be less transmission
Transmission isn't just from one source at one event . ( why numbers of infected mean nothing)
it come at us all the time from exposure anytime we are around people.
I have no idea of how many infections there really are in the USA because not everyone gets tested
and infections dont necessarily follow from exposure.
Trying to quantify is a fools game -right up your alley- because with the nature of delta and now omnicron you can bet your last million dollars you have been exposed as has everyone else. my point
no you are NOT free to choose-
not without consequences with a mandate. stop being a simpleton by ignoring the obvious
Yes, every fucking choice has consequences. You want yours to be consequence free. Tough shit, pal. Doesn't work that way.
he's an idiot. a rank partisan. i recognize his style (argumentum without merit) from another board.
this dude can't play chess ( i am about 1600) worth a damn but is big on self congratulations.
trolling egotistical partisan - the worse
possible but much less likely
https://www.statnews.com/2020/04/14/how-much-of-the-coronavirus-does-it-take-to-make-you-sick/
Viral load is a measure of virus particles. It is the amount of virus present once a person has been infected and the virus has had time to replicate in their cells. With most viruses, higher viral loads are associated with worse outcomes.
damn you are stupid. you say something, i correct you, and then you tell me what i told you!
Haven't played in tournaments for years. I doubt you have either. I was rated 1650.
damn you are stupid. you say something, i correct you, and then you tell me what i told you!
No, you claimed you couldn't choose. Yes you can. You are beyond stupid.
No, trying to quantify is science. LOL at you. Go answer the phone, clown. Someone wants a MyPillow.
sure you were. you never played on DCJ, you never commented on the games i played with what's his name.
And of course you have to say you are better then me by 50 points.
If you understood ratings you would say you were "about" 1650 like I said I was "about" 1600
as they go up and down by wins and losses and comparisons to others.
your ego is bigger then your millions (if that is even true) -and your stupidity is boundless
I haven't played or been rated since 1981. My last USCF rating was 1650. I lost interest.
trying to quantify transmission by exposure is a fools game = your game -not chess
Tell that to all the public health officials that do exactly that. I'm sure they'll listen to a telephone salesman.
Life is Golden
It's Morning in America Again
I noticed that.
sure it was. which conveniently explains why you could never comment on games.
At about 1600 you should have been able to easily see the openings and combos, and end game strategy
- but never did because you "lost interest" - yet you screamed "checkmate"at every opportunity.
How's that Libya thing going that you and TUT used to say was a great victory?
you are a trolling boring, lying, hyper-partisan waste of time -same as you ever were
same old HUDAMAN
he's always the best. a legend in his own mind
Couldn't care less if you believe me or not. You were the one that wanted to act like a big shot and post his rating. Mine was higher. My copy of BCO was well worn. Played in dozens of tournaments for about ten years. I moved on to other things. Mainly stratomatic and other sports strategy games. They were easier to play and took less time.
you fucking moron. exposure is not numerically equal to transmission;
there are other factors involved