ExpressLane
Verified User
That information came from the FBI themselves So you are an idiot but everyone here already knew thatROFLMAO. You just proved you are a gullible idiot. Unfortunately, no prosecutor will indict you for that.
That information came from the FBI themselves So you are an idiot but everyone here already knew thatROFLMAO. You just proved you are a gullible idiot. Unfortunately, no prosecutor will indict you for that.
That's the problem at the moment. Biden was caught doing the exact same thing. If Trump gets prosecuted, then most reasonable people are going to ask why didn't the Hildabeast get prosecuted, and why isn't Joke getting prosecuted. That's a reasonable question to which you either get excuses and dissembling from supporters of the two, or deer in the headlights...
That's the problem at the moment. Biden was caught doing the exact same thing. If Trump gets prosecuted, then most reasonable people are going to ask why didn't the Hildabeast get prosecuted, and why isn't Joke getting prosecuted. That's a reasonable question to which you either get excuses and dissembling from supporters of the two, or deer in the headlights...
[video=twitter;1661747436346544128]https://twitter.com/GOPoversight/status/1661747436346544128?s=20[/vide
The Director should do exactly what Trump and his little Trumper cultist wannabe minions always do....
Tell them toand ignore it.
See how they like it.
Isn’t it ironic, the party who ignores subpoenas expects compliance.
That's the problem at the moment. Biden was caught doing the exact same thing. If Trump gets prosecuted, then most reasonable people are going to ask why didn't the Hildabeast get prosecuted, and why isn't Joke getting prosecuted. That's a reasonable question to which you either get excuses and dissembling from supporters of the two, or deer in the headlights...
It's not a matter of having classified data, it's all about the intent. Its obvious from bits and pieces we have learned that Trump refused to return documents, and we dont know who those documents of his were given to, who he showed them to and who may have purchase them.
Trump is a criminal
That information came from the FBI themselves So you are an idiot but everyone here already knew that
Your opinion is not part of the FBI. The FBI can tell the difference between data on a computer that isn't marked classified but should be classified and documents that contain a heading that states they are "classified" while contained in folders that state "classified."
The FBI can also understand how someone can not know that something that is not marked classified is classified and how someone that has eyesight and reading capabilities of a 6th grader can NOT not know that a document that clearly states it is "classified" is covered under a subpoena that requires they turn over ALL documents marked "classified."
Not quite, Terry, but since you have no problem taking home classified documents, I can see why you want to give Pedo Don a pass.
Called intent, did the party purposely leave with those documents by design, or as we saw with Trump, even go as far as to deny they ever had them
I'm fine with prosecuting them all. You want to let Herr Trump off because Hillary wasn't prosecuted.Actually, Trump has a far better excuse than either Joke or the Hildabeast. He was president at the time, and presidents can declassify anything they choose to. Yes, there is a process for that officially, but at least Trump could make a reasonable argument that he declassified the documents. In the case of Joke and the Hildabeast, they had no such authority and were, and are, clearly in violation of law and rules covering the handling of classified documents. "I didn't know" isn't an excuse to not be charged. Possession, regardless of intent, is sufficient evidence to charge someone with mishandling classified documents.
I'm being fair about this, you on the other hand, are letting your terminal case of TDS get in the way.
It's not a matter of having classified data, it's all about the intent. Its obvious from bits and pieces we have learned that Trump refused to return documents, and we dont know who those documents of his were given to, who he showed them to and who may have purchase them.
Trump is a criminal
I'm fine with prosecuting them all. You want to let Herr Trump off because Hillary wasn't prosecuted.
Your continual refusal to acknowledge the difference between willful hiding of materials vs. full cooperation is expected per your earlier comments regarding handling classified material.
Absolutely wrong! Possession is sufficient for criminal charges to be brought. Real life example I saw while in the Navy. A junior Petty Officer took a Reactor Plant Manual (RPM) home to study so he could get qualified sooner. His intentions were completely honorable and good. He showed the manual to no one else. He got caught bringing it back onto the ship. He was court martialed for mishandling classified documents.
INTENT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH IT. POSSESSION IS SUFFICIENT FOR CRIMINAL CHARGES.
I'm fine with prosecuting them all. You want to let Herr Trump off because Hillary wasn't prosecuted.
Your continual refusal to acknowledge the difference between willful hiding of materials vs. full cooperation is expected per your earlier comments regarding handling classified material.
I'm not a Sea Lawyer, but disagree on "credible defense".They should go for it. Of the three, only Trump has any credible defense, like it or not. It may be somewhat iffy, but at least he does have a reasonable claim to having declassified the documents. If all three were convicted of the felony involved, fine by me.
Absolutely wrong! Possession is sufficient for criminal charges to be brought. Real life example I saw while in the Navy. A junior Petty Officer took a Reactor Plant Manual (RPM) home to study so he could get qualified sooner. His intentions were completely honorable and good. He showed the manual to no one else. He got caught bringing it back onto the ship. He was court martialed for mishandling classified documents.
INTENT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH IT. POSSESSION IS SUFFICIENT FOR CRIMINAL CHARGES.
Yet you want to let Trump off. Why?