I'm not actually sure one way or the other, but it gives off the vibe of a right-wing MAGA chickITN is female????? That I find surprising. I'm used to only dudes being as obtuse as ITN. LOL.
I'm not actually sure one way or the other, but it gives off the vibe of a right-wing MAGA chickITN is female????? That I find surprising. I'm used to only dudes being as obtuse as ITN. LOL.
what.I'm not actually sure one way or the other, but it gives off the vibe of a right-wing MAGA chick
That's because Sybil is cray-cray. Fun to study, but conversation is a waste of time with the mentally ill.It's to your credit that you are motivated to get physics right.
ITN just digs her heels in and digs the hole deeper when she is flagrantly incorrect, lol
maybe.That's because Sybil is cray-cray. Fun to study, but conversation is a waste of time with the mentally ill.
ITN = gfm = IBDa = Sybil for short. It's a pretty good guess Uncensored2008 is another Sybil sock. Lots of similarities in tone and beliefs.ITN is female????? That I find surprising. I'm used to only dudes being as obtuse as ITN. LOL.
My claim is nothing more than the science in question, which is exactly correct as you noted.You claim to supposedly want to get physics exactly right,
What I am ignoring is your pivot. I keep giving you correct answers while you keep rejecting them out of hand in deference to your error-filled misunderstanding. Let's you and I avoid changing the topic away from Relativity to Into the Night. Let's stick with the science.but then you totally ignored your boyfriend ITN writing something completely false and ass-backwards incorrect about gravitational time dilation
The Universe is only one Universe (by definition). It has no date or age.Spirit predates,the Physical universe, and is on a higher plane
You can't blame your sock problem on anybody else, Sybil. I am not you.ITN = gfm = IBDa = Sybil for short. It's a pretty good guess Uncensored2008 is another Sybil sock. Lots of similarities in tone and beliefs.
I am not you, Sybil.I'm not actually sure one way or the other, but it gives off the vibe of a right-wing MAGA chick
That you are.That's because Sybil is cray-cray.
Not really.Fun to study,
I agree.but conversation is a waste of time with the mentally ill.
My claim is nothing more than the science in question, which is exactly correct as you noted.
What I am ignoring is your pivot. I keep giving you correct answers while you keep rejecting them out of hand in deference to your error-filled misunderstanding. Let's you and I avoid changing the topic away from Relativity to Into the Night. Let's stick with the science.
You assert that Einstein's creation of Relativity caused forces to stop classically accelerating masses. Your assertion is stupid. Yes, I can see why you are now desperate to change the subject to Into the Night, but we're going to remain here on this point so that you can explain yourself.
The Physical universe very much has a starting date! The millisecondThe Universe is only one Universe (by definition). It has no date or age.
So you fancy yourself a genius scientist who gets to declare his own delusions as science.So you fancy yourself Doctor Science,
You haven't explained why you imagine you are a teacher of physics, but then you intentionally stayed silent when your beloved boyfriend ITN made the stupidest and most scientifically illiterate statement on the entire thread.So you fancy yourself a genius scientist who gets to declare his own delusions as science.
Let me know when you can stop pivoting away from the topic out of sheer desperation to save your sacred delusion.
You're absolutely right. I can't be your teacher if you can't learn. You got me on that one.You haven't explained why you imagine you are a teacher of physics,
just stick with the facts.You haven't explained why you imagine you are a teacher of physics, but then you intentionally stayed silent when your beloved boyfriend ITN made the stupidest and most scientifically illiterate statement on the entire thread.
So you refuse to explain why you act like you want to get the details of physics right, but then intentionally ignored the most scientifically ignorant comment on the entire thread because it came from your beloved boyfriend ITN.You're absolutely right.
I think the God of the Jews abandoned this rock.
If by "Absentee God" you mean the Deist "Watchmaker God", I don't have a problem with it. Unlike atheists who believe the Universe just magically popped into existence for no rhyme or reason, I believe there is a rhyme and reason for the existence of the Universe. Using a "God" as a placeholder for that creation works for me.The "Absentee" God is about as meaningful as any other version proposed thus far in this thread. The concept of a God as a simple placeholder to explain "where everything comes from" but cannot be described or even known in any real way and the only evidence of its existence is that things exist seems utterly pointless to me.