Unconscious? You Know You Wanted It
- Thread starter Cancel7
- Start date
- Status
I didn't bring up Clinton I posted in support of the supposition that snarla's a hypocrite and desh is misinformed.
charver
You lookin' at my pint?
nice dodge and failure to admit your incessent whining about me lately while ignoring onceler is only about the last 20 minutes
have you thought about having that "word" with yourself....
actions speak louder words... so time will tell if your words true, can't change the past....so let's see
First i'm in some sort of conspiricy with Darla and onceler and now i'm whining about you incessantly?
I've already offered to give onceler a stern talking to and i might even remove his tv privileges.
Just point me in the direction of the thread he "brings your name up first in a thread for no apparent reason".
You wrote too fast because you're agitated, as you usually are. You really need to calm down when it comes to my posts and you not responding to them correctly.
I read through the "new" reply - 6 of one, half a dozen of the other. Damn Yankee & ID didn't address the issue presented in this thread; they went straight for "Clinton." I wasn't lying.
And, like I told ID, I know you're usually all over "your side" for dodging issues, so I expect better next time......
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
No it doesn't. Darla's OP was simply more of her hate towards Republicans:
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
let me be more clear
onceler is saying 1. the DA said this equaled consent, and 2. that the "right wing" has defended this by bringing up clinton
unfortunately for onceler, the DA never said it equals consent and no one on this board has said it equals consent
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
lol...i write fast all the time
keep up your hatred onceler...it only kills you not me
you lied and i explained it in more detail above....i love how you keep whining about hypocrisy bringing me up and charver doesn't say boo to ouy
LOL
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
its right in this thread charvey and the two are pefectly reasonable and true....not a conspiracy at all, fact as laid out by your actions
he even admits to it twice...he brings me up to ID for no reason except to harp on me for something not thread related
you suck at this
oh boy...onceler's bringing me up....i wonder if charver will whine about this
Only because ID mentioned you.
You want me to do a search on "Onceler" under your moniker?
That would be interesting....
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
Only because ID mentioned you.
You want me to do a search on "Onceler" under your moniker?
That would be interesting....
lol....liar
yeah, do a search...because i usually refer to people by their user names in posts...and you of course would use those examples of bringing up your name onceler...
you're sad, in a funny way
Nah - you've called me "dunceler" quite a bit, as well. And I've seen you bring me up literally dozens of times in threads I didn't post in; it's the weirdest thing to go into a thread for the first time, and see someone talking about me like you do.
And the threads - don't get me started on the threads you start about me.
My reply to ID was because she brought you up, and also because you made such an enormous deal about your own courage in taking on "your side" when principle demands it, which has been somewhat undermined by this thread....
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
I said it's their "very best defense." What else would you infer from their responses on this thread? Have they made any effort to actually address the issue?
I'll save you some time; they haven't. Ergo, the very best defense they could come up with to cover for this guy - which is all they're doing - is "Clinton."
Well, that is a lie; webbway did his best to dismiss it because it's 5 years old.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
Yurt, i'd urge you to just read this thread back and consider whether this message board bidness has all become a little too "real" for you.
You is seriously mental.
translation: yurt's right and i still won't call out onceler despite saying i would
hey man, you're the one that kept asking me for examples and when i give them...i'm seriously mental....now thats weird
don't want answers, don't ask for them
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
nice weasel...now...i've been asking for a link where anyone said what happened equals consent, you provided a link that said no such thing
so...still waiting for a link to where someone said this equaled consent and where the DA said this equaled consent and someone defended that by saying clinton...
stop pussying footing around produce or admit you're wrong, simple really
If Bush were brought up to show the one sided hypocritical position of the thread starter it would be appropriate since Clinton was not mentioned as a defense.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
see...this is yoiur problem....you never call out your side, but constantly whine about others not calling out the other side
what i have defended, as have others, is darla's claim that the DA's decision not to prosecute does not equal he hates women...in fact, snarla has take affront to that and said i hate women because of that
yet, you who don't "really" agree with her, won't call her out and did not say boo about it until i brought it up...then you lie and claim the DA and othes said what happened equals consent
Why am I being asked to produce a link for something I didn't claim?
Yurt, I responded to you as best I could. The righties I was referring to - DY, ID and webbway - didn't say word one about the issue being presented. They brought up Clinton, or in webbway's case, tried to marginlize it because it was 5 years old.
Ergo, this was their "best defense" of this politicians behavior, which I still find deplorable. It's all they could come up with.
Again - you have a zero tolerance policy for this when it comes to lefties & Bush. A little consistency would be nice....
- Status