Unconscious? You Know You Wanted It

Status
Not open for further replies.
Which proves my point. Your only response to the situation described was to either bring up Clinton, or give other posters' props for bringing up Clinton.

I'm surprised - usually Yurt would be all over that kind of dodge of the issue being discussed; he certainly is when Bush is brought up. Must have been a lapse....

oh boy...onceler's bringing me up....i wonder if charver will whine about this

:)
 
Which proves my point. Your only response to the situation described was to either bring up Clinton, or give other posters' props for bringing up Clinton.

I'm surprised - usually Yurt would be all over that kind of dodge of the issue being discussed; he certainly is when Bush is brought up. Must have been a lapse....

I didn't bring up Clinton I posted in support of the supposition that snarla's a hypocrite and desh is misinformed.
 
:palm:

nice dodge and failure to admit your incessent whining about me lately while ignoring onceler is only about the last 20 minutes

have you thought about having that "word" with yourself....

actions speak louder words... so time will tell if your words true, can't change the past....so let's see

First i'm in some sort of conspiricy with Darla and onceler and now i'm whining about you incessantly?

I've already offered to give onceler a stern talking to and i might even remove his tv privileges.

Just point me in the direction of the thread he "brings your name up first in a thread for no apparent reason".
 
i wrote too fast...i edited my post while you made this stupid reply

now, go back and read my post, it makes more sense now and try and defend your lies and your statement above is simply not true...no one said it equalled consent, you're a liar

You wrote too fast because you're agitated, as you usually are. You really need to calm down when it comes to my posts and you not responding to them correctly.

I read through the "new" reply - 6 of one, half a dozen of the other. Damn Yankee & ID didn't address the issue presented in this thread; they went straight for "Clinton." I wasn't lying.

And, like I told ID, I know you're usually all over "your side" for dodging issues, so I expect better next time......
 
So, just to sum up, the right-wing's very best defense for a guy who thought a woman saying "no" and passing out = "consent" is this:

"Clinton"

let me be more clear

onceler is saying 1. the DA said this equaled consent, and 2. that the "right wing" has defended this by bringing up clinton

unfortunately for onceler, the DA never said it equals consent and no one on this board has said it equals consent
 
You wrote too fast because you're agitated, as you usually are. You really need to calm down when it comes to my posts and you not responding to them correctly.

I read through the "new" reply - 6 of one, half a dozen of the other. Damn Yankee & ID didn't address the issue presented in this thread; they went straight for "Clinton." I wasn't lying.

And, like I told ID, I know you're usually all over "your side" for dodging issues, so I expect better next time......

lol...i write fast all the time

keep up your hatred onceler...it only kills you not me

you lied and i explained it in more detail above....i love how you keep whining about hypocrisy bringing me up and charver doesn't say boo to ouy

LOL
 
First i'm in some sort of conspiricy with Darla and onceler and now i'm whining about you incessantly?

I've already offered to give onceler a stern talking to and i might even remove his tv privileges.

Just point me in the direction of the thread he "brings your name up first in a thread for no apparent reason".

its right in this thread charvey and the two are pefectly reasonable and true....not a conspiracy at all, fact as laid out by your actions

he even admits to it twice...he brings me up to ID for no reason except to harp on me for something not thread related

you suck at this
 
Only because ID mentioned you.

You want me to do a search on "Onceler" under your moniker?

That would be interesting....

:)

lol....liar

usually Yurt would be all over that kind of dodge of the issue being discussed; he certainly is when Bush is brought up

yeah, do a search...because i usually refer to people by their user names in posts...and you of course would use those examples of bringing up your name onceler...

you're sad, in a funny way
 
lol....liar



yeah, do a search...because i usually refer to people by their user names in posts...and you of course would use those examples of bringing up your name onceler...

you're sad, in a funny way

Nah - you've called me "dunceler" quite a bit, as well. And I've seen you bring me up literally dozens of times in threads I didn't post in; it's the weirdest thing to go into a thread for the first time, and see someone talking about me like you do.

And the threads - don't get me started on the threads you start about me.

My reply to ID was because she brought you up, and also because you made such an enormous deal about your own courage in taking on "your side" when principle demands it, which has been somewhat undermined by this thread....
 
let me be more clear

onceler is saying 1. the DA said this equaled consent, and 2. that the "right wing" has defended this by bringing up clinton

unfortunately for onceler, the DA never said it equals consent and no one on this board has said it equals consent

notice onceler avoids this like the plague

oh noze...i said onceler
 
notice onceler avoids this like the plague

oh noze...i said onceler

I said it's their "very best defense." What else would you infer from their responses on this thread? Have they made any effort to actually address the issue?

I'll save you some time; they haven't. Ergo, the very best defense they could come up with to cover for this guy - which is all they're doing - is "Clinton."

Well, that is a lie; webbway did his best to dismiss it because it's 5 years old.
 
:D

Yurt, i'd urge you to just read this thread back and consider whether this message board bidness has all become a little too "real" for you.

You is seriously mental.
 
I should just add - I can only imagine your responses if leftie posters were responding to a similar incident involving a leftie politican by simply bringing up Bush.

Actually, I don't have to imagine it; you're on that stuff right away. You don't miss a beat.
 
:D

Yurt, i'd urge you to just read this thread back and consider whether this message board bidness has all become a little too "real" for you.

You is seriously mental.

translation: yurt's right and i still won't call out onceler despite saying i would

:)

hey man, you're the one that kept asking me for examples and when i give them...i'm seriously mental....now thats weird

don't want answers, don't ask for them
 
I said it's their "very best defense." What else would you infer from their responses on this thread? Have they made any effort to actually address the issue?

I'll save you some time; they haven't. Ergo, the very best defense they could come up with to cover for this guy - which is all they're doing - is "Clinton."

Well, that is a lie; webbway did his best to dismiss it because it's 5 years old.

nice weasel...now...i've been asking for a link where anyone said what happened equals consent, you provided a link that said no such thing

so...still waiting for a link to where someone said this equaled consent and where the DA said this equaled consent and someone defended that by saying clinton...

stop pussying footing around produce or admit you're wrong, simple really
 
I should just add - I can only imagine your responses if leftie posters were responding to a similar incident involving a leftie politican by simply bringing up Bush.

Actually, I don't have to imagine it; you're on that stuff right away. You don't miss a beat.

If Bush were brought up to show the one sided hypocritical position of the thread starter it would be appropriate since Clinton was not mentioned as a defense.
 
I should just add - I can only imagine your responses if leftie posters were responding to a similar incident involving a leftie politican by simply bringing up Bush.

Actually, I don't have to imagine it; you're on that stuff right away. You don't miss a beat.

see...this is yoiur problem....you never call out your side, but constantly whine about others not calling out the other side

what i have defended, as have others, is darla's claim that the DA's decision not to prosecute does not equal he hates women...in fact, snarla has take affront to that and said i hate women because of that

yet, you who don't "really" agree with her, won't call her out and did not say boo about it until i brought it up...then you lie and claim the DA and othes said what happened equals consent
 
nice weasel...now...i've been asking for a link where anyone said what happened equals consent, you provided a link that said no such thing

so...still waiting for a link to where someone said this equaled consent and where the DA said this equaled consent and someone defended that by saying clinton...

stop pussying footing around produce or admit you're wrong, simple really

Why am I being asked to produce a link for something I didn't claim?

Yurt, I responded to you as best I could. The righties I was referring to - DY, ID and webbway - didn't say word one about the issue being presented. They brought up Clinton, or in webbway's case, tried to marginlize it because it was 5 years old.

Ergo, this was their "best defense" of this politicians behavior, which I still find deplorable. It's all they could come up with.

Again - you have a zero tolerance policy for this when it comes to lefties & Bush. A little consistency would be nice....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top