It's not a question of religion dummy.
It's a legitimate question of science and philosophy.
0.0073
- Thread starter Cypress
- Start date
It's not a question of religion dummy.
It's a legitimate question of science and philosophy.
Into the Night
Verified User
Religion isn't science, Sock. You don't get away with making a religious argument and calling it 'science'.
I honestly wish you were smarter.Seriously. You are an annoying fuck up
Sorry you are so easily confused. But I suspect it is quite common for you.
Also, it's "too", not "to" when using the adverb.
So you lied when you claimed you the only reason you stalked and lurked my threads was because you found my topics so fascinating.
But you immediately dismissed this topic as pointless navel gazing, but then here you are lurking it, responding to it, and secretly complaining to the mods about it.
This thread was languishing in obscurity until you lurked it, bumped it, and started complaining about it
IBDaMann
Well-known member
It's completely a matter of religion, you cowardly moron who never learned anything. The concept of a "finely tuned" universe assumes an intelligent "tuner" you idiot. That is a theistic assumption.
Only in the minds of scientifically illiterate, mathematically incompetent, Quora-raiding, Wikipedia-ranging, Google-surfing, economics challenged, logically inept morons. Your religious beliefs are not thettled thienth.
Go learn something. Anything! Just learn something.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
You are still entertaining with all the pretense of mockery towards things that are totally correct. Keep it up. Every court needs a fool.
Obscure message board posters with no expertise in physics:
-- "Fine tuning is bullshit!
Some of the leading physicists of the 20th century:
--> Fine tuning is real, widely recognized by professional physicists and cosmologists, and we need to try to understand it.
Physicist Steven Hawking has noted, "The laws of science, as we know them at present, contain many fundamental numbers, like the size of the electric charge of the electron and the ratio of the masses of the proton and the electron. The remarkable fact is that the values of these numbers seem to have been very finely adjusted to make possible the development of life."
Physicist Paul Davies has said, "There is now broad agreement among physicists and cosmologists that the Universe is in several respects ‘fine-tuned' for life". However, he continued, "the conclusion is not so much that the Universe is fine-tuned for life; rather it is fine-tuned for the building blocks and environments that life requires."
Physicist Paul Davies claimed that certain forces in physics, such as gravity and electromagnetism, must be perfectly fine-tuned for life to exist in the universe
Physicist Fred Hoyle argued for a fine-tuned universe in his 1984 book The Intelligent Universe. "The list of anthropic properties, apparent accidents of a non-biological nature without which carbon-based and hence human life could not exist, is large and impressive"
-- "Fine tuning is bullshit!
Some of the leading physicists of the 20th century:
--> Fine tuning is real, widely recognized by professional physicists and cosmologists, and we need to try to understand it.
Physicist Steven Hawking has noted, "The laws of science, as we know them at present, contain many fundamental numbers, like the size of the electric charge of the electron and the ratio of the masses of the proton and the electron. The remarkable fact is that the values of these numbers seem to have been very finely adjusted to make possible the development of life."
Physicist Paul Davies has said, "There is now broad agreement among physicists and cosmologists that the Universe is in several respects ‘fine-tuned' for life". However, he continued, "the conclusion is not so much that the Universe is fine-tuned for life; rather it is fine-tuned for the building blocks and environments that life requires."
Physicist Paul Davies claimed that certain forces in physics, such as gravity and electromagnetism, must be perfectly fine-tuned for life to exist in the universe
Physicist Fred Hoyle argued for a fine-tuned universe in his 1984 book The Intelligent Universe. "The list of anthropic properties, apparent accidents of a non-biological nature without which carbon-based and hence human life could not exist, is large and impressive"
Last edited:
Bulverism
Argument from ignorance fallacy
Bulverism
Argument from ignorance fallacy
IBDaMann
Well-known member
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Yakuda
Verified User
Makes sense. The fact is there is no legitimate way to oppose things like murder if there isn't a standard beyond those established by humans.
Bulverism
Argument from ignorance fallacy
What kind of Oscillator are you??? RF?????
I'm RIGHT and Richard Feynman and Steven Hawking are WRONG! Fine tuning doesn't exist!
Bulverism
Argument from ignorance fallacy
This thread is about physics, you yo-yo, of which you know nothing about, so STFU.
Last edited:
Cypress isn't capable of responding in any way! He never learned how. Too funny!
Did you ask sensible questions????
It's completely a matter of religion, you cowardly moron who never learned anything. The concept of a "finely tuned" universe assumes an intelligent "tuner" you idiot. That is a theistic assumption.
Only in the minds of scientifically illiterate, mathematically incompetent, Quora-raiding, Wikipedia-ranging, Google-surfing, economics challenged, logically inept morons. Your religious beliefs are not thettled thienth.
Go learn something. Anything! Just learn something.
"Go learn something" I certainly wish IBDaMann would go and learn something.
Yakuda
Verified User
You're lucky your computer can spell fiziks for you huh?
IBDumbass does not ask questions in good faith.
He composes what he thinks are 'gotcha' questions, and then runs away like a girl when it blows up in his face -->
Click this hyperlink : IBDumbass has his "gotcha" question blow up in his face, and then slinks away from the thread
I can plainly see that, he is a just troll.