So?
21 y.o. black tells truth about black failure. IT'S IQ, NOT RACISM
- Thread starter Text Drivers are Killers
- Start date
So?
Minister of Truth
Practically Perfect
So the Founding Fathers gave us judicial review.
No. Those particular judges showed that, just like the judges of today, they assume more power than the Constitution grants them. Then, by the bullshit theory of precedence, this allows the Constitution to gradually lose it's significance. Thus, the disgusting "living breathing" bullshit that liberals suck up like pigs on gravy.
lol
Nothing's changed since the 1780s. No need to interpret the Constitution or BofR in the context of a 21st Century.
Fucking moron.
Minister of Truth
Practically Perfect
Yeah, it's called common law. And those six justices were a handful of many/most who held that theory.
Text Drivers are Killers
Joe Biden - "Time to put Trump in the bullseye."
Yes indeed. The SC rewrites the constitution at will and then calls it an interpretation!!! Where does the constitution say illegal kids have a right to free k-12???
lol
An idiot like you needs a 1,000 page Constitution to enact any laws.
What a fool...
A moron is someone who believes that words on a piece of paper are "living and breathing".
Common sense dictates that a revisit on the original interpretation is sometimes necessary.
Text Drivers are Killers
Joe Biden - "Time to put Trump in the bullseye."
The power to interpret a law is the power to rewrite the law.
Text Drivers are Killers
Joe Biden - "Time to put Trump in the bullseye."
Answer my question. Where does the constitution say illegal kids have a right to free k-12.? In 1982, the SC said it was in the constitution!!!
Language always needs some sort of interpretation. Over or creative interpretation is the problem here. My rule is to interpret based on a plain language reading, knowing about how people wrote back in the day along with the commentary from the writers themselves. Applicable commentary includes The Federalist Papers and known letters to peers, greater weight added to writings prior to the signing of the Constitution since they were trying to "sell" the bill, and lesser weight to later writings, and no weight at all after retirement.
I have to laugh at an ignorant fuck like you. You believe that something has to be specifically mentioned in the Constitution before a law can be enacted.
No wonder you are recognized as such a fool.
Expressions in the English language escape you, don't they, dumbfuck? Pathetic
So it's just an expression now. Talk about moving the goal posts...
"Living and breathing" when it refers to a document? Yeah, you stupid fuck, it is an expression. It means it's not etched in stone. BTW, "etched in stone" is also an expression, fucking moron.
That's your side's expression, and no, the Constitution is etched in stone. If you want to change it, pass an amendment.
Time's change, fucktard. New situations arise requiring new interpretations. Too fucking bad you're stuck in the 18th century.
Again, if you want to change it, pass an amendment. Are are you too afraid the People won't agree with you lol?
You've already forgotten how your ass was handed to you on Butler, Dole and the General Welfare Clause, haven't you? Didn't need an Amendment. The authority was already there.