21 y.o. black tells truth about black failure. IT'S IQ, NOT RACISM

Folks, let me break it down, the SCOTUS decision in that case also meant that the preamble to our Constitution is not part of the actual Constitution.

This is well settle law. But ignorant hacks like cofefe and her twin, gomer, don't know what they are talking about.

And they whine about people who vote.
 
Yaya said:
My Goodness, How Stupid Can You Be.

Nevermind, I Don't Want To Know.
Click to expand...
The question is, how stupid can you be, the only Berubari Union case I could find related to India, are you citing an Indian case in regards to our Constitution and preamble?
 
Anyway, I already knew it wasn't, but was too lazy to actually read the link.

Is the preamble to the U.S. Constitution law?
Promoted by Lawyers.com
Find the Right Lawyer for You
Profiles and trusted client reviews and ratings of millions of local attorneys.
Learn more at lawyers.com
4 Answers
Cliff Gilley
Cliff Gilley, JD cum laude, Seattle University Class of 2000
Updated Oct 18, 2014
No; the preamble is not considered to be effective law; it is a statement of the purpose of the document that it precedes, and may inform the interpretation of that document, but it is not law itself.
https://www.quora.com/Is-the-preamble-to-the-U-S-Constitution-law

In the end I was right, but sloppy.
 
Yaya said:
Folks, let me break it down, the SCOTUS decision in that case also meant that the preamble to our Constitution is not part of the actual Constitution.
Click to expand...

HAHAHA. And where do 9 unelected judges get the authority to decide which parts of the constitution count??? THINK, moron.

BTW - the preamble is obviously part of the constitution. You might as well say the first sentence of the bible is not part of the bible.!!!!
 
Yaya said:
In the Berubari Union case,1960, the Supreme Court stated that Preamble is not a part of the Constitution.

Ignorant mouth breathing ape.
Click to expand...

Again i ask - where do these judges get authority to tell us what parts of the constitution are part of the constitution!!!!

You are really stupid - you accept everything unelected judges say.
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
HAHAHA. And where do 9 unelected judges get the authority to decide which parts of the constitution count??? THINK, moron.

BTW - the preamble is obviously part of the constitution. You might as well say the first sentence of the bible is not part of the bible.!!!!
Click to expand...

Do you think we should not respect the "unelected" Justices of the Judiciary Branch?
 
Yaya said:
Do you think we should not respect the "unelected" Justices of the Judiciary Branch?
Click to expand...

The constitution grants the SC no authority to write laws or repeal laws or rewrite the constitution. And yet they do all 3 all the time and the idiot american goes along.
 
Yaya said:
The US Constitution and Marbury v. Madison
Click to expand...

Yes i know about marbury. The SC judges simply GRANTED themselves authority to repeal and rewrite laws passed by congress!!!!. The constitution says no such thing. In fact the constitution says they don't have the authority. " All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a congress of the united states."

THINK, america-hater.
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
The constitution grants the SC no authority to write laws or repeal laws or rewrite the constitution. And yet they do all 3 all the time and the idiot american goes along.
Click to expand...

They don't write laws, nor repeal laws, nor rewrite the constitution. They are the THIRD branch of our government that is charged with:

Section 2
1: The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;—to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;—to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;—to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;

I know most racists are dumb, but you're dumber than most.
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
HAHAHA. And where do 9 unelected judges get the authority to decide which parts of the constitution count??? THINK, moron.

BTW - the preamble is obviously part of the constitution. You might as well say the first sentence of the bible is not part of the bible.!!!!
Click to expand...

The people who wrote it didn't think it's part of the Constitution, either. Obviously, you know better than those dunces...
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
Yes i know about marbury. The SC judges simply GRANTED themselves authority to repeal and rewrite laws passed by congress!!!!. The constitution says no such thing. In fact the constitution says they don't have the authority. " All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a congress of the united states."

THINK, america-hater.
Click to expand...

The 1803 Court was comprised of founding fathers.
 
Yaya said:
The Marbuy court was comprised of only founding fathers? Wow, did not now this. Even if partially, I never heard this is school.
Click to expand...

Only one of the six was an actual Framer (William Patterson). Marshall, and two others took part in ratification conventions, one signed the Declaration, and two were veterans of the war. So, yeah, it was a Court of exclusively founding fathers. Four of the six were even appointed by Washington.
 
Threedee said:
Only one of the six was an actual Framer (William Patterson). Marshall, and two others took part in ratification conventions, one signed the Declaration, and two were veterans of the war. So, yeah, it was a Court of exclusively founding fathers. Four of the six were even appointed by Washington.
Click to expand...

Was your major history? Or something related?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top