5 ways to tell if you're a Libertarian

[cawacko]

How to spot a libertarian. Well he is 18 years old. and thinks Ayn Rand was a great writer. Most people outgrow it. Rand Paul never did, nor did Greenspan. They both hurt the country with it.

What has Rand Paul done as a Libertarian that he wouldn't have done if he was a Republican?

 

[CFM]

My issue with libertarians is their snootiness and superiority of their view.

That is a perfect description of STY. He demands acceptance of his beliefs and nothing less is good enough for him.

 

[canceled.2021.1]

That is a perfect description of STY. He demands acceptance of his beliefs and nothing less is good enough for him.

Exactly. Apparently it is a zero sum game for him

What is hilarious is that he puts himself on this pedestal as the only person who understands the US Constitution yet when a state or city does something to restrict gun rights he flips his lid.

Well any person who had a true understanding of federalism and the real intent of the Constitution would have zero issue with an individual state dictating gun laws.

But that isn’t how our buddy sees it

 

[CFM]

Exactly. Apparently it is a zero sum game for him

What is hilarious is that he puts himself on this pedestal as the only person who understands the US Constitution yet when a state or city does something to restrict gun rights he flips his lid.

Well any person who had a true understanding of federalism and the real intent of the Constitution would have zero issue with an individual state dictating gun laws.

But that isn’t how our buddy sees it

If you don't believe that he understands the Constitution, just ask him. He'll tell you and use himself as the source to back it up.

He's that kind that if you aren't with him 100% and automatically accept what he believes, you may as well be his enemy. People like that concern me more than a lefty with which I disagree. You know where they're coming from. With him, one wrong move and he may snap.

 

[canceled.2021.1]

If you don't believe that he understands the Constitution, just ask him. He'll tell you and use himself as the source to back it up.

He's that kind that if you aren't with him 100% and automatically accept what he believes, you may as well be his enemy. People like that concern me more than a lefty with which I disagree. You know where they're coming from. With him, one wrong move and he may snap.

Agree 100%

He can’t accept that I agree with him on 99% of issues

Apparently his desire to get stoned overrides everything else

 

[canceled.2021.1]

Awwwww how cute. You think you stumbled on some sort of “gotcha” don’t you? Well how fucking embarrassing for you.



What is even more embarrassing for you is you sucked Unka into your foolishness

This is what happens when you assume. You make an ass out of YOU.

What happened to my buddy Archives?

Guess he didn’t take his fisting too well.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Exactly. Apparently it is a zero sum game for him

What is hilarious is that he puts himself on this pedestal as the only person who understands the US Constitution yet when a state or city does something to restrict gun rights he flips his lid.

Well any person who had a true understanding of federalism and the real intent of the Constitution would have zero issue with an individual state dictating gun laws.

But that isn’t how our buddy sees it

i'm guessing you've never heard of state constitutions with right to bear arms citations??????

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Agree 100%

He can’t accept that I agree with him on 99% of issues

Apparently his desire to get stoned overrides everything else

apparently you don't understand how or why to debate, nor do you think that people can dislike drugs but believe that government has no authority to prohibit some of them.

 

[iolo]

you do not understand Libertarianism

Does anyone? It sounds like drunken, incoherent rubbish, surely?

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Does anyone? It sounds like drunken, incoherent rubbish, surely?

makes perfect sense to millions of others, so that leaves me concerned with your ability to understand things.

 

[canceled.2021.1]

i'm guessing you've never heard of state constitutions with right to bear arms citations??????

I have. Nice try though

 

[iolo]

makes perfect sense to millions of others, so that leaves me concerned with your ability to understand things.

I expect I'll survive: I was an anarchist in my early adolescence, and it seemed to make a lot more sense than all this capitalist hogwash. You can't have capitalism without a police state to keep the swag you know, and that's not compatible with liberty.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

I have. Nice try though

what the hell do you mean 'nice try'? so state constitutions can have right to bear arms, but regulate the fuck out of it?

 

[Nordberg]

the typical ravings of an insane liberal who hasn't yet faced the reality of the world.

Typical libertarian response. You have nothing. You always have nothing.You think reality is Libertarianism? WTF. How wrong can you be?

 

[SmarterthanYou]

I expect I'll survive: I was an anarchist in my early adolescence, and it seemed to make a lot more sense than all this capitalist hogwash. You can't have capitalism without a police state to keep the swag you know, and that's not compatible with liberty.

you're surviving due to your statist government only, because you seriously don't understand anarchy, capitalism, or a police state.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Typical libertarian response. You have nothing. You always have nothing.You think reality is Libertarianism? WTF. How wrong can you be?

Orwells 1984 was a book, not a blueprint for you to adapt.

 

[canceled.2021.1]

what the hell do you mean 'nice try'? so state constitutions can have right to bear arms, but regulate the fuck out of it?

Depends. I don’t presume to be an expert on EVERY states Constitution.

But I think you knew that

I was merely drawing a distinction between the feds and the States. But I think you knew that too.

You are a riot. Only a true waterhead could think that someone who ardently supports the 2nd Amendment thinks otherwise. You are a special kind of water head

 

[iolo]

you're surviving due to your statist government only, because you seriously don't understand anarchy, capitalism, or a police state.

What on earth does that mean. If you are a capitalist, you steal a high proportion of the cost of commodities from those who make them, and therefore you must have them also pay for a huge state apparatus to keep them from taking it back. You are a state-worshipper who depends totally on police and state lying, as you know.

 

[Oracle Of JPP 714]

IHA gets fudge packed

You will have to clarify your first question

No I do not support a national policy on drugs

That being said true libertarians SHOULD have zero problem with States crafting drug policy.

I will clarify further. While I am not fully in favor of legalizing drugs it is not an issue I get all lathered up about.

the only time you get lathered is when someone is fudge packing you.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

As far as I can understand it, American libertarians believe in capitalism but hate the capitalist state, so - perhaps confusedly - they are keen to destroy capitalism, which is a good plan. Currently, in the allegedly socialist (to American weirdoes) UK vast number are going to work when badly ill, and not taking their annual holidays, because they are desperate to keep their ill-paid jobs. So much for capitalist 'freedom', eh?

So you decided to return, after being spanked and made to sit in the corner for a couple of weeks.