A woman's basic right over her body doesn't "belong w/ the states"

Oh, that's simple. It's her body. The only thing he had to do with it was drop off some sperm. If he did not want to be a father and/or on the hook for child support, he should have refrained from sex or used protection. He has no right to force her to either abort or give birth, any more than she has the right to force him to get a vasectomy.

The end.
derp derp goes the retard

why isn't it his body when he has to fill out a selective service card?
 
So you do not understand that a baby comes from a woman's body? Why does the guy have a right over the woman's body? You really cannot understand that?
So why doesn't the baby have any rights or considerations..? (Do keep in mind that the woman did not create the baby on her own...) Don't be creating children if you don't want them...
 
Last edited:
I mean, you're making my point. Some policies DO belong w/ the states, based on circumstance.

A woman's right to choose is a much more inherent right than anything you mentioned. That's the idea. I'm actually not sure how you missed that.

Choose?

What a nice and dishonest euphemism for "kill your offspring."

Why do you fear democracy? In most states people have supported abortion.

Democracy offends democrats, who demand dictatorship.
 
Choose?

What a nice and dishonest euphemism for "kill your offspring."

Why do you fear democracy? In most states people have supported abortion.

Democracy offends democrats, who demand dictatorship.
If you live in a state you live in the US. If you want to secede, then do it. We are citizens of the US, not the state we reside in.
 
So you do not understand that a baby comes from a woman's body? Why does the guy have a right over the woman's body? You really cannot understand that?
your ignorance bias notwithstanding, the guy has no right over a womans body, any more than a woman should have a right to his resources should she decide to have the child. you really cannot understand that?
 
If you live in a state you live in the US. If you want to secede, then do it. We are citizens of the US, not the state we reside in.

You know utterly nothing of the United States.

We are 50 sovereign states that have formed a federation for mutual protection and a system of courts to resolve interstate disputes.

Read the Constitution - it isn't difficult or confusing. And perhaps you'll stop trying to destroy the Republic that you don't have any knowledge of.
 
You know utterly nothing of the United States.

We are 50 sovereign states that have formed a federation for mutual protection and a system of courts to resolve interstate disputes.

Read the Constitution - it isn't difficult or confusing. And perhaps you'll stop trying to destroy the Republic that you don't have any knowledge of.
What did you think you were refuting in my post?
 
So why doesn't the baby have any rights or considerations..?
It's the same with a Mafia contract killing, i.e. the victim doesn't have any "rights" or any "say."

When the topic is "Killing living humans who have not committed any crime" then obviously the victim doesn't get any consideration, ... legal, moral or any other.

When the Mafia puts a contract out on some man's son, you know that the father isn't going to get any say, and the Mafia isn't going to somehow grow a conscience and reconsider its lifestyle.

Leftists and the Mafia are shitty people who are very bad for a civilized society.
 
You're an inarticulate moron.
ROFL

You've been exposed as an ignoramus with zero grasp of how the United States works. You think this is a central dictatorship like China - it is not. We are a collection of independent states in a federation.

Your fellow Maoists are trying to stir up support for their party by attacking democracy.

37 states have virtually unrestricted abortion. Only 13 have restrictions. What gives you Communists the right to impose your beliefs on those states?

Because you are offended by every live birth?
 
ROFL

You've been exposed as an ignoramus with zero grasp of how the United States works. You think this is a central dictatorship like China - it is not. We are a collection of independent states in a federation.

Your fellow Maoists are trying to stir up support for their party by attacking democracy.

37 states have virtually unrestricted abortion. Only 13 have restrictions. What gives you Communists the right to impose your beliefs on those states?

Because you are offended by every live birth?
You are unbelievably stupid. You should be embarrassed to write such nonsense.
 
You know utterly nothing of the United States.

We are 50 sovereign states that have formed a federation for mutual protection and a system of courts to resolve interstate disputes.

Read the Constitution - it isn't difficult or confusing. And perhaps you'll stop trying to destroy the Republic that you don't have any knowledge of.
Where does the Constitution state we are a "federation?"
 
Where does the Constitution state we are a "federation?"

ROFL

Good lord you are stupid.

Tell me, working both your brain cells, just what is it you think "federal" means?

{Federalism at the Founding can therefore best be described as “Enumerated Powers Federalism.” The national government was conceived as one of limited and enumerated powers. The powers of states were simply everything left over after that enumeration. This is expressed in the first words of Article I, which created Congress: “All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States.” The Tenth Amendment reinforces this principle: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.” State power, then, was protected not by affirmatively shielding state power, but by limiting the ability of the federal government to act in the first place. }



You truly are astoundingly ignorant.
 
ROFL

Good lord you are stupid.

Tell me, working both your brain cells, just what is it you think "federal" means?

{Federalism at the Founding can therefore best be described as “Enumerated Powers Federalism.” The national government was conceived as one of limited and enumerated powers. The powers of states were simply everything left over after that enumeration. This is expressed in the first words of Article I, which created Congress: “All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States.” The Tenth Amendment reinforces this principle: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.” State power, then, was protected not by affirmatively shielding state power, but by limiting the ability of the federal government to act in the first place. }



You truly are astoundingly ignorant.
So the US Constitution never refers to our nation as a "federation."
 
So the US Constitution never refers to our nation as a "federation."

Again retard - what exactly do you think "Federal" means?

Rub both those brain cells together.

The Continental Congress was Confederated - a confederation. They had to go through the states for all things. When the Constitution was formed we turned into a federation where powers were enumerated directly to the FEDERAL government and could be exercised independent of the states.
 
Back
Top