Abortion Follies: Texas style

LV426 said:
What's odd is that you would lie about yourself on an anonymous message board for no other reason than to lend yourself credibility you don't otherwise have.
Click to expand...

You don't to decide 'credibility' for anyone. You don't get to speak for anyone but yourself. You are not the King.
 
LV426 said:
Abortion isn't murder because according to Jewish law (Old Testament, loser), a fetus doesn't have a soul and the life of the mother is what is most important.

You don't get a soul until you're born (well, not YOU because you're soulless, but everyone else); prior to that, you don't count for anything.
Click to expand...

No such Jewish law. Abortion is murder. Attempted proof by substitution. Pivot fallacy.
 
LV426 said:
What you provided was for when a pregnant woman is harmed, not the fetus.
Click to expand...

no....the one I provided, "thou shall not kill" was for both......but the passage from Exodus, which someone else provided, was specifically for the unborn child........there were already provisions for what would happen if someone injured a man's wife.......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
no....the one I provided, "thou shall not kill" was for both......
Click to expand...

According to Jewish law, a fetus doesn't have a soul...only once it is born is it recognized as a life (and if it's a boy, not really until the bris).

So...are you now saying Jews are wrong and evil?
 
LV426 said:
Yes, the choice to abort the fetus. That is her choice and her choice alone to make.
Click to expand...
It is not her choice. Murder is not a right.
LV426 said:
If you want to take away her bodily autonomy in order to save a life,
Click to expand...
It is not about her autonomy. It is about murder.
LV426 said:
then I should be able to tear a kidney out of you without your consent to save the life of someone with kidney failure. After all, you can live with just 1 kidney.
Click to expand...
Pivot fallacy. False equivalence fallacy.
 
LV426 said:
Sure it is!

You have a fantasy about police, and that poem shatters the fantasy.

Because you're highly emotional and prone to outbursts, your rage drove Foster off social media.

So because you lack self control, we are deprived of her presence.

Thanks for nothing.
Click to expand...

Random wanderings. No coherent argument.
 
LV426 said:
According to Jewish law, a fetus doesn't have a soul...only once it is born is it recognized as a life (and if it's a boy, not really until the bris).

So...are you now saying Jews are wrong and evil?
Click to expand...

No such law. Pivot fallacy. The Bible is being discussed, not any Jewish law.
 
LV426 said:
That's not a miscarraige.

A miscarriage would be you beating your pregnant wife because you felt like it, and that caused her to lose the baby.

It's what you people do all the time.
Click to expand...

so if you beat a woman and she loses her child it is a miscarriage, but if you use a scalpel and she loses her child its nothing?.....
 
Default
Quote Originally Posted by LV426 View Post
"If my younger sister was in a car accident and desperately needed a blood transfusion to live, and I was the only person on Earth who could donate blood to save her, and even though donating blood is relatively easy, safe, and quick procedure, NO ONE CAN FORCE ME TO GIVE BLOOD. Yes, even to save the life of a fully grown person, it would be ILLEGAL and UNETHICAL to force me to donate blood if I didn't want to.

See, we have this concept called "bodily autonomy". It's this cultural notion that a person's control over their own body is above all important and must not be infringed upon.

We can't even take LIFE SAVING ORGANS from corpses unless the person whose corpse it is gave consent before their death. Even dead bodies get bodily autonomy.

To tell people that they must sacrifice their bodily autonomy for 9 months against their will in an incredibly expensive, invasive, difficult process to save what YOU view as another human life (a debatable claim in the early stages of pregnancy when the vast majority of abortions are performed) is deeply, desperately, depravedly unethical. You can't even ask people to sacrifice bodily autonomy to give up organs they aren't using anymore after they have died.

You're demanding women accept less bodily autonomy than you give to dead bodies."

And furthermore, if you demand that women must carry a pregnancy to full term, then you must also support the state pulling organs out of your body (dead or alive) to save the life of someone else...someone you don't know, have never met, and will never meet.
Click to expand...

so in summary, we can't take your blood to save your sisters' life without your permission........we can't take a person's organs to save a person's life without their permission......but you say we can't stop a woman from chopping her unborn baby into tiny pieces for whatever reason she feels like and she doesn't need the child's permission........
 
LV426 said:
According to Jewish law, a fetus doesn't have a soul...only once it is born is it recognized as a life (and if it's a boy, not really until the bris).

So...are you now saying Jews are wrong and evil?
Click to expand...

the ones who kill their children?....without question......
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Oh, Sybil. Quite being silly. You know that the vaccine, when fully in effect,
Click to expand...
Define "fully in effect".

Dutch Uncle said:
helps both prevent catching COVID
Click to expand...
Nope. It does no such thing. In fact, it injects COVID right into you.

Dutch Uncle said:
and, if caught, lessens it's severity.
Click to expand...
Does it? I just recently heard a story about a famous boxer who got jabbed yet still wound up in an ICU... Meanwhile, Joe Rogan, who DIDN'T get jabbed, treated himself early on with monoclonal antibodies and ivermectin and he felt better almost instantly.

Why do you think differently?[/QUOTE]
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top